Suppr超能文献

与镰状细胞病和地中海贫血相关的输血服务知识及免疫血液学实践。

Transfusion service knowledge and immunohaematological practices related to sickle cell disease and thalassemia.

作者信息

Fasano R M, Branscomb J, Lane P A, Josephson C D, Snyder A B, Eckman J R

机构信息

Center for Transfusion and Cellular Therapies, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Georgia Health Policy Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Transfus Med. 2019 Jun;29(3):185-192. doi: 10.1111/tme.12580. Epub 2019 Feb 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess current knowledge of National Heart, Lung and Blood Institutes (NHLBI) and Thalassemia International Federation (TIF) recommendations, blood banking practices and perceived challenges among transfusion services in the management of patients with haemoglobinopathies.

BACKGROUND

Previous reports have demonstrated variations in transfusion practices for sickle cell disease (SCD) and thalassemia patients. Recently, NHLBI/TIF have provided transfusion recommendations for patients with haemoglobinopathies.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted of transfusion services from the state of Georgia previously identified as having SCD/thalassemia populations. The survey assessed transfusion service practices in pre-transfusion testing and blood product selection; awareness/implementation of NHLBI/TIF transfusion-based recommendations and perceived challenges in transfusing haemoglobinopathy patients.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 35 of 49 (71%) institutions. Only institutions indicating transfusing SCD or thalassemia patients (32) were included in analysis. Seventy-one percent of non-sickle cell treatment centres (SCTCs) and 20% of non-thalassemia treatment centres follow NHLBI and TIF recommendations to perform a red blood cell phenotype beyond ABO/Rh(D) and provide Rh and Kell prophylactically matched units for SCD and thalassemia patients, respectively. Forty percent of institutions (33% of non-SCTCs) employ RBC genotyping to evaluate the red cell phenotype for SCD patients. Over 77% of institutions do not utilise a reliable method to identify SCD patients prior to transfusion, such as a required question/answer field on type/screen or crossmatch orders.

CONCLUSION

Many healthcare systems' transfusion practices for haemoglobinopathy patients are discordant with NHLBI/TIF recommendations. Efforts are needed to increase awareness and implementation of current recommendations among all transfusion services seeing these patients.

摘要

目的

评估美国国立心肺血液研究所(NHLBI)和地中海贫血国际联合会(TIF)的建议、血库操作以及输血服务机构在血红蛋白病患者管理中所感知到的挑战方面的现有知识。

背景

既往报告显示镰状细胞病(SCD)和地中海贫血患者的输血操作存在差异。最近,NHLBI/TIF为血红蛋白病患者提供了输血建议。

方法

对佐治亚州先前确定有SCD/地中海贫血人群的输血服务机构进行横断面调查。该调查评估了输血前检测和血液制品选择中的输血服务操作;NHLBI/TIF基于输血的建议的知晓/实施情况以及在为血红蛋白病患者输血时所感知到的挑战。

结果

49家机构中有35家(71%)回复。仅将表示为SCD或地中海贫血患者输血的机构(32家)纳入分析。71%的非镰状细胞治疗中心(SCTC)和20%的非地中海贫血治疗中心遵循NHLBI和TIF的建议,对SCD和地中海贫血患者分别进行ABO/Rh(D)以外的红细胞表型检测,并分别提供Rh和Kell血型相匹配的预防性血液成分。40%的机构(非SCTC的33%)采用红细胞基因分型来评估SCD患者的红细胞表型。超过77%的机构在输血前未采用可靠方法识别SCD患者,例如在血型/筛查或交叉配血订单上设置必填的问题/答案字段。

结论

许多医疗系统对血红蛋白病患者的输血操作与NHLBI/TIF的建议不一致。需要努力提高所有诊治这些患者的输血服务机构对现行建议的知晓度和实施情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10ac/6767094/4febed7f63c6/TME-29-185-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验