Matsuno Yoritaka, Yamazaki Shintaro, Mitsuka Yusuke, Abe Hayato, Moriguchi Masamichi, Higaki Tokio, Takayama Tadatoshi
Department of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Ohyaguchikami-machi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
World J Surg. 2021 Feb;45(2):571-580. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05833-3. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
Subcuticular sutures reduce wound complication rates only in clean surgeries. Repeat resection is frequently required in liver surgery, due to the high recurrence rate (30-50%) of liver cancers. The aim of this study is to assess that subcuticular sutures is superior to staples in liver surgery.
This single-centre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial was conducted at a university hospital between January 2015 and October 2018. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either subcuticular sutures or staples for skin closure. Three risk factors (repeat resection, diabetes mellitus and liver function) were matched preoperatively for equal allocation. The primary endpoint was the wound complication rate, while secondary endpoints were surgical site infection (SSI), duration of postoperative hospitalisation and total medical cost. Subset analyses were performed only for the 3 factors allocated as secondary endpoints.
Of the 581 enrolled patients, 281 patients with subcuticular sutures and 283 patients with staples were analysed. As the primary outcome, the wound complication rate with subcuticular sutures (12.5%) did not differ from that with staples [15.9%; odds ratio (OR), 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.83-2.15; p = 0.241]. As secondary outcomes, no significant differences were identified between the two procedures in the overall cohort while overall wound complications [7 patients (8.5%) vs. 17 patients (20.0%); OR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.08-7.29; p = 0.035] with repeat incision were significantly less frequent with subcuticular sutures.
Subcuticular sutures were not shown to reduce wound complications compared to staples in open liver resection, but appear beneficial for repeat incisions.
皮下缝合仅在清洁手术中可降低伤口并发症发生率。由于肝癌的高复发率(30%-50%),肝脏手术中经常需要重复切除。本研究的目的是评估在肝脏手术中皮下缝合是否优于吻合器。
本单中心、单盲、随机对照试验于2015年1月至2018年10月在一家大学医院进行。患者被随机分配(1:1)接受皮下缝合或吻合器进行皮肤闭合。术前对三个风险因素(重复切除、糖尿病和肝功能)进行匹配以实现均衡分配。主要终点是伤口并发症发生率,次要终点是手术部位感染(SSI)、术后住院时间和总医疗费用。仅对作为次要终点分配的3个因素进行亚组分析。
在581名入组患者中,分析了281例接受皮下缝合的患者和283例接受吻合器的患者。作为主要结局,皮下缝合的伤口并发症发生率(12.5%)与吻合器的伤口并发症发生率[15.9%;优势比(OR),1.33;95%置信区间(CI),0.83-2.1;p = 0.241]无差异。作为次要结局,在整个队列中,两种手术方法之间未发现显著差异,而重复切口的总体伤口并发症[7例患者(8.5%)对17例患者(20.0%);OR,2.68;95%CI,1.08-7.29;p = 0.035]在皮下缝合时明显较少。
在开放性肝切除术中,皮下缝合与吻合器相比并未显示出可降低伤口并发症,但对重复切口似乎有益。