Department of Nephrology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Nephrology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China,
Kidney Blood Press Res. 2020;45(6):873-882. doi: 10.1159/000509443. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
Kidney biopsy, providing the insightful information for most kidney diseases, is an invasive diagnostic tool with certain risks ranging from the least severe macroscopic hematuria to the most severe life-threatening bleeding necessitating renal artery embolization. We aimed to compare the postbiopsy bleeding complications between 2 common methods and to further explore the risk factors of bleeding complications in patients using the negative pressure suction puncture (NPS) method.
We retrospectively collected the data from percutaneous native kidney biopsies in 2016. The clinical, laboratory tests, pathological findings, and the occurrence of bleeding complications following kidney biopsy were analyzed. The kidney biopsy was performed in our center by experienced nephrologists with 2 different methods, namely, NPS method and real-time ultrasound-guided needle (RTU) method. We compared rates of complications between 2 methods and evaluated univariate and multivariate association of risk factors with bleeding complications in the NPS group.
626 kidney biopsies were performed between January 2016 and December 2016. There were 83.2% (521/626) participants in the NPS group and 16.8% (105/626) in the RTU group. There were more participants in the RTU group needing >1 needle pass during biopsy than those in the NPS group (61.0 vs. 14.7%, p < 0.001). Acute kidney disease (AKD) occurred before the procedure of kidney biopsy accounted for 13.8% (72/521) in the NPS group and 1.9% (2/105) in the RTU group. The renal pathological findings revealed higher number of glomeruli in the NPS group than in the RTU group (26.8 ± 13.0 vs. 17.2 ± 8.6, p < 0.001). The incidence of bleeding complications in the NPS group was lower than that in the RTU group (9.2 vs. 21.9%, p < 0.01). Logistic multivariate regression showed that AKD was independently associated with bleeding complications after kidney biopsy in the NPS group.
Regarding the bleeding risk, there was noninferiority of NPS over RTU. AKD contributes to higher risks of bleeding complications after kidney biopsy.
肾脏活检为大多数肾脏疾病提供了深入的信息,是一种具有一定风险的侵入性诊断工具,从最轻微的肉眼血尿到最严重的危及生命的出血(需要肾动脉栓塞治疗)都有发生。我们旨在比较两种常见方法的活检后出血并发症,并进一步探讨使用负压抽吸穿刺(NPS)方法的患者出血并发症的危险因素。
我们回顾性收集了 2016 年经皮原位肾活检的数据。分析了临床、实验室检查、病理结果以及肾活检后出血并发症的发生情况。肾活检由经验丰富的肾病医生在我们中心进行,采用两种不同的方法,即 NPS 法和实时超声引导针(RTU)法。我们比较了两种方法的并发症发生率,并评估了 NPS 组中危险因素与出血并发症的单因素和多因素相关性。
2016 年 1 月至 12 月期间共进行了 626 例肾活检,其中 NPS 组占 83.2%(521/626),RTU 组占 16.8%(105/626)。在 RTU 组中,活检时需要超过 1 次穿刺针的患者比例高于 NPS 组(61.0%比 14.7%,p < 0.001)。在 NPS 组中,在进行肾活检前发生急性肾疾病(AKD)的患者比例为 13.8%(72/521),而在 RTU 组中为 1.9%(2/105)。NPS 组肾小球数量多于 RTU 组(26.8 ± 13.0 比 17.2 ± 8.6,p < 0.001)。NPS 组的出血并发症发生率低于 RTU 组(9.2%比 21.9%,p < 0.01)。多因素逻辑回归显示,在 NPS 组中,AKD 与肾活检后出血并发症独立相关。
就出血风险而言,NPS 并不逊于 RTU。AKD 导致肾活检后出血并发症风险增加。