Department of Emergency Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen.
Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden.
Eur J Emerg Med. 2021 Jun 1;28(3):202-209. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000766.
Healthcare personnel working in the emergency department (ED) is at risk of acquiring severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-Cov-2). So far, it is unknown if the reported variety in infection rates among healthcare personnel is related to the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) or other factors.
The aim of this study was to investigate the association between PPE use and SARS-CoV-2 infections among ED personnel in the Netherlands.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A nationwide survey, consisting of 42 questions about PPE-usage, ED layout - and workflow and SARS-CoV-2 infection rates of permanent ED staff, was sent to members of the Dutch Society of Emergency Physicians. Members were asked to fill out one survey on behalf of the ED of their hospital. The association between PPE use and the infection rate was investigated using univariable and multivariable regression analyses, adjusting for potential confounders.
Primary outcome was the incidence of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections among permanent ED staff between 1 March and 15 May 2020.
Surveys were sent to 64 EDs of which 45 responded (70.3%). In total, 164 ED staff workers [5.1 (3.2-7.0)%] tested positive for COVID-19 during the study period compared to 0.087% of the general population. There was significant clustering of infected ED staff in some hospitals (range: 0-23 infection). In 13 hospitals, an FFP2 (filtering facepiece particles >94% aerosol filtration) mask or equivalent and eye protection was worn for all contacts with patients with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 during the whole study period. The unadjusted staff infection rate was higher in these hospitals [7.3 (3.4-11.1) vs. 4.0 (1.9-6.1)%, absolute difference + 3.3%]. Hospital staff testing policy was identified as a potential confounder of the relation between PPE use and confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections (collinearity statistic 0.95). After adjusting for hospital testing policy, type of PPE was not associated with incidence of COVID 19 infections among ED staff (P = 0.40).
In this cross-sectional study, the use of high-level PPE (FFP2 or equivalent and eye protection) by ED personnel during all contacts with patients with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 does not seem to be associated with a lower infection rate of ED staff compared to lower level PPE use. Attention should be paid to ED layout and social distancing to prevent cross-contamination of ED personnel.
在急诊科工作的医护人员有感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型(SARS-CoV-2)的风险。到目前为止,尚不清楚医护人员报告的感染率差异是否与个人防护设备(PPE)的使用或其他因素有关。
本研究旨在调查荷兰急诊科人员 PPE 使用与 SARS-CoV-2 感染之间的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:一项全国性调查,共包含 42 个关于 PPE 使用、急诊科布局和工作流程以及永久性急诊科工作人员 SARS-CoV-2 感染率的问题,发送给荷兰急诊医师学会的成员。成员们被要求代表医院填写一份调查。使用单变量和多变量回归分析,调整潜在混杂因素,调查 PPE 使用与感染率之间的关系。
主要结果是 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 5 月 15 日期间永久性急诊科工作人员确诊 SARS-CoV-2 感染的发生率。
共向 64 家急诊科发送了调查,但只有 45 家做出了回应(70.3%)。在此期间,共有 164 名急诊科工作人员[5.1(3.2-7.0)%]的 COVID-19 检测呈阳性,而普通人群的感染率为 0.087%。一些医院的感染急诊科工作人员明显聚集(范围:0-23 例感染)。在 13 家医院,在整个研究期间,所有接触疑似或确诊 SARS-CoV-2 患者的医护人员都佩戴 FFP2(过滤颗粒>94%气溶胶过滤)口罩或等效口罩和眼部防护装置。这些医院的未调整工作人员感染率较高[7.3(3.4-11.1)比 4.0(1.9-6.1)%,绝对差异+3.3%]。医院工作人员检测政策被确定为 PPE 使用与确诊 SARS-CoV-2 感染之间关系的潜在混杂因素(共线性统计量 0.95)。调整医院检测政策后,PPE 类型与急诊科工作人员 COVID-19 感染发生率无关(P=0.40)。
在这项横断面研究中,与使用较低水平的 PPE(FFP2 或等效物和眼部保护装置)相比,急诊科工作人员在接触疑似或确诊 SARS-CoV-2 患者期间使用高级别的 PPE(FFP2 或等效物和眼部保护装置)似乎不会降低急诊科工作人员的感染率。应注意急诊科布局和保持社交距离,以防止急诊科工作人员交叉感染。