Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.
Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Feb;121(2):465-478. doi: 10.1007/s00421-020-04531-1. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
An age-related decline in anticipatory postural mechanisms has been reported during gait initiation; however, it is unclear whether such decline may jeopardize whole-body stability following unexpected balance perturbations. This study aimed to compare young and older individuals' ability to generate postural responses and preserve stability in response to external waist perturbations delivered within gait initiation.
Ten young and ten older participants performed 10 gait initiation trials followed by 48 unperturbed and 12 perturbed trials in a random order. A stereophotogrammetric system and three force platforms were used to quantify mechanical parameters from the preparatory phase (e.g., timing and amplitude of postural adjustments) and from the stepping phase (e.g., step characteristics and dynamic stability). Activation patterns of lower leg muscles were determined by surface electromyography.
Older participants responded to perturbation with lower increase in both magnitude (p < 0.001; η = 0.62) and duration (p = 0.001; η = 0.39) of preparatory parameters and soleus muscle activity (p < 0.001; η = 0.55), causing shorter (p < 0.001; η = 0.59) and lower (p < 0.001; η = 0.43) stepping, compared to young participants. Interestingly, young participants showed greater correlations between preparatory phase parameters and dynamic stability of the first step than older participants (average r of - 0.40 and - 0.06, respectively).
The results suggest that young participants took more time than older to adjust the anticipatory biomechanical response to perturbation attempting to preserve balance during stepping. In contrast, older adults were unable to modify their anticipatory adjustments in response to perturbation and mainly relied on compensatory mechanisms attempting to preserve stability via a more cautious stepping strategy.
据报道,在步态启动过程中,与年龄相关的姿势预测机制会出现衰退;然而,目前尚不清楚这种衰退是否会危及到在受到意外平衡干扰后整个身体的稳定性。本研究旨在比较年轻人和老年人在步态启动过程中受到外部腰部干扰时,产生姿势反应和维持稳定性的能力。
10 名年轻人和 10 名老年人分别完成 10 次步态启动试验,然后以随机顺序进行 48 次无干扰和 12 次干扰试验。使用立体摄影测量系统和三个力平台来量化准备阶段(例如,姿势调整的时间和幅度)和跨步阶段(例如,跨步特征和动态稳定性)的机械参数。通过表面肌电图确定小腿肌肉的激活模式。
与年轻人相比,老年人对干扰的反应是准备阶段的参数(幅度和持续时间)和比目鱼肌活动(p<0.001;η=0.55)的增加幅度更低(p<0.001;η=0.62),准备阶段参数和动态稳定性的相关性也更强(年轻人的平均 r 值为-0.40,老年人的平均 r 值为-0.06)。
结果表明,与年轻人相比,老年人无法调整对干扰的预期生物力学反应,试图在跨步过程中保持平衡。相比之下,老年人无法根据干扰调整他们的预期调整,主要依赖于代偿机制,通过更谨慎的跨步策略来保持稳定性。