Dubbeldam Rosemary, Lee Yu Yuan, Pennone Juliana, Mochizuki Luis, Le Mouel Charlotte
Department of Movement Science, Institute of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
School of Arts, Sciences, and Humanities, University of São Paulo and School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2023 Feb 11;20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s11556-023-00312-9.
The objective of this systematic review is to identify motion analysis parameters measured during challenging walking tasks which can predict fall risk in the older population. Numerous studies have attempted to predict fall risk from the motion analysis of standing balance or steady walking. However, most falls do not occur during steady gait but occur due to challenging centre of mass displacements or environmental hazards resulting in slipping, tripping or falls on stairs. We conducted a systematic review of motion analysis parameters during stair climbing, perturbed walking and obstacle crossing, predictive of fall risk in healthy older adults. We searched the databases of Pubmed, Scopus and IEEEexplore.A total of 78 articles were included, of which 62 simply compared a group of younger to a group of older adults. Importantly, the differences found between younger and older adults did not match those found between older adults at higher and lower risk of falls. Two prospective and six retrospective fall history studies were included. The other eight studies compared two groups of older adults with higher or lower risk based on mental or physical performance, functional decline, unsteadiness complaints or task performance. A wide range of parameters were reported, including outcomes related to success, timing, foot and step, centre of mass, force plates, dynamic stability, joints and segments. Due to the large variety in parameter assessment methods, a meta-analysis was not possible. Despite the range of parameters assessed, only a few candidate prognostic factors could be identified: older adults with a retrospective fall history demonstrated a significant larger step length variability, larger step time variability, and prolonged anticipatory postural adjustments in obstacle crossing compared to older adults without a fall history. Older adults who fell during a tripping perturbation had a larger angular momentum than those who did not fall. Lastly, in an obstacle course, reduced gait flexibility (i.e., change in stepping pattern relative to unobstructed walking) was a prognostic factor for falling in daily life. We provided recommendations for future fall risk assessment in terms of study design.In conclusion, studies comparing older to younger adults cannot be used to explore relationships between fall risk and motion analysis parameters. Even when comparing two older adult populations, it is necessary to measure fall history to identify fall risk prognostic factors.
本系统评价的目的是确定在具有挑战性的步行任务中测量的运动分析参数,这些参数可预测老年人群的跌倒风险。许多研究试图通过站立平衡或稳定步行的运动分析来预测跌倒风险。然而,大多数跌倒并非发生在稳定步态期间,而是由于具有挑战性的质心位移或环境危险导致滑倒、绊倒或在楼梯上跌倒。我们对爬楼梯、受扰步行和穿越障碍物期间的运动分析参数进行了系统评价,这些参数可预测健康老年人的跌倒风险。我们检索了PubMed、Scopus和IEEEexplore数据库。共纳入78篇文章,其中62篇只是简单地比较了一组年轻人和一组老年人。重要的是,年轻人和老年人之间发现的差异与跌倒风险较高和较低的老年人之间发现的差异不匹配。纳入了两项前瞻性和六项回顾性跌倒史研究。其他八项研究根据心理或身体表现、功能下降、不稳定主诉或任务表现,比较了两组跌倒风险较高或较低的老年人。报告了广泛的参数,包括与成功、时间、足部和步幅、质心、测力板、动态稳定性、关节和节段相关的结果。由于参数评估方法种类繁多,无法进行荟萃分析。尽管评估的参数范围很广,但只能确定少数几个候选预后因素:与没有跌倒史的老年人相比,有回顾性跌倒史的老年人在穿越障碍物时步长变异性显著更大、步时变异性更大,且预期姿势调整时间延长。在绊倒扰动期间跌倒的老年人比未跌倒的老年人具有更大的角动量。最后,在障碍课程中,步态灵活性降低(即相对于无障碍步行的步姿变化)是日常生活中跌倒的一个预后因素。我们就研究设计为未来的跌倒风险评估提供了建议。总之,比较老年人和年轻人的研究不能用于探索跌倒风险与运动分析参数之间的关系。即使在比较两组老年人群时,也有必要测量跌倒史以确定跌倒风险预后因素。