• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知识转化的齿轮:传播和实施患者参与工具包的过程评估。

The Gears of Knowledge Translation: Process Evaluation of the Dissemination and Implementation of a Patient Engagement Toolkit.

机构信息

VISN 4 Center for the Evaluation of Patient Aligned Care Teams (CEPACT), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, VA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):808-814. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06099-0. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-020-06099-0
PMID:33107002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7652949/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient engagement is a key tenet of patient-centered care and is associated with many positive health outcomes. To improve resources for patient engagement, we created a web-based, interactive patient engagement toolkit to improve patient engagement in primary care across the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

OBJECTIVE

To use the knowledge translation (KT) framework to evaluate the dissemination and implementation of a patient engagement toolkit at facilities across one region in the VHA.

DESIGN

Using a mixed-methods approach, this process evaluation involved phone monitoring via semi-structured interviews and group meetings, during which we explored barriers and facilitators to KT. Outcomes were assessed using a structured rubric and existing patient satisfaction measures.

PARTICIPANTS

We enlisted implementers at 40 VHA facilities primarily serving Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware to implement patient engagement practices at their sites. Sites were randomly assigned into a high or low coaching group to assess whether external support influenced implementation.

KEY RESULTS

Sites with high rubric scores employed and possessed several elements across the KT trajectory from identification of the problem to sustainment of knowledge use. Key factors for successful implementation and dissemination included implementer engagement, organizational support, and strong collaborators. The most frequently cited barriers included short staffing, time availability, lack of buy-in, and issues with leadership. Successful implementers experienced just as many barriers, but leveraged facilitators to overcome obstacles. While sites that received more coaching did not have different outcomes, they were more likely to revisit the toolkit and indicated that they felt more accountable to local personnel.

CONCLUSIONS

Because leveraging available resources is a key component of successful implementation, future toolkits should highlight the type of facilitators necessary for successful implementation of toolkit content in healthcare settings. The ability to tailor interventions to local context is critical for overcoming barriers faced in most healthcare settings.

摘要

背景

患者参与是以患者为中心的护理的关键原则,与许多积极的健康结果相关。为了改善患者参与的资源,我们创建了一个基于网络的互动患者参与工具包,以改善退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)内的初级保健中的患者参与度。

目的

使用知识转化(KT)框架评估 VHA 一个区域内的各个设施中患者参与工具包的传播和实施情况。

设计

使用混合方法,该过程评估包括通过半结构化访谈和小组会议进行电话监测,在此期间,我们探讨了 KT 的障碍和促进因素。使用结构化评分表和现有的患者满意度措施评估结果。

参与者

我们招募了 40 个主要为宾夕法尼亚州、新泽西州和特拉华州提供服务的 VHA 设施的实施者,要求他们在各自的场所实施患者参与实践。根据是否接受外部支持来评估实施情况,将站点随机分配到高或低辅导组中。

主要结果

在 KT 轨迹中,从确定问题到维持知识使用,评分较高的站点都采用并具备了几个要素。成功实施和传播的关键因素包括实施者的参与、组织支持和强大的合作者。实施中最常遇到的障碍包括人手不足、时间可用性、缺乏认可以及领导层的问题。成功的实施者也遇到了同样多的障碍,但利用促进因素克服了障碍。虽然接受更多辅导的站点没有产生不同的结果,但他们更有可能重新访问工具包,并表示他们对当地人员更有责任感。

结论

由于利用现有资源是成功实施的关键组成部分,因此未来的工具包应突出显示在医疗保健环境中成功实施工具包内容所需的促进因素类型。根据当地情况调整干预措施的能力对于克服大多数医疗保健环境中面临的障碍至关重要。

相似文献

1
The Gears of Knowledge Translation: Process Evaluation of the Dissemination and Implementation of a Patient Engagement Toolkit.知识转化的齿轮:传播和实施患者参与工具包的过程评估。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):808-814. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06099-0. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
2
Improving Patient-centered Care: How Clinical Staff Overcome Barriers to Patient Engagement at the VHA.改善以患者为中心的护理:VHA 临床工作人员如何克服患者参与的障碍。
Med Care. 2018 Dec;56(12):1009-1017. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001007.
3
Supporting the implementation of stroke quality-based procedures (QBPs): a mixed methods evaluation to identify knowledge translation activities, knowledge translation interventions, and determinants of implementation across Ontario.支持基于质量的卒中程序(QBPs)的实施:一项混合方法评估,旨在确定安大略省实施过程中的知识转化活动、知识转化干预措施和实施决定因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 18;18(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3220-9.
4
A qualitative study of clinic and community member perspectives on intervention toolkits: "Unless the toolkit is used it won't help solve the problem".一项关于临床医生和社区成员对干预工具包看法的定性研究:“除非使用工具包,否则无助于解决问题”。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 18;17(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2413-y.
5
Open access in the patient-centered medical home: lessons from the Veterans Health Administration.患者为中心的医疗之家的开放获取:退伍军人健康管理局的经验教训。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Apr;28(4):539-45. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2279-y. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
6
Creating a Toolkit to Reduce Disparities in Patient Engagement.创建一个减少患者参与度差异的工具包。
Med Care. 2017 Sep;55 Suppl 9 Suppl 2:S59-S69. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000748.
7
Organizational factors associated with readiness to implement and translate a primary care based telemedicine behavioral program to improve blood pressure control: the HTN-IMPROVE study.与基于初级保健的远程医疗行为项目的实施和转化相关的组织因素,以改善血压控制:HTN-IMPROVE 研究。
Implement Sci. 2013 Sep 8;8:106. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-106.
8
Formative evaluation and adaptation of pre-and early implementation of diabetes shared medical appointments to maximize sustainability and adoption.对糖尿病共享医疗预约的前期及早期实施进行形成性评估和调整,以最大限度地提高可持续性和采用率。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 7;19(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0797-3.
9
Development of a veteran engagement toolkit for researchers.为研究人员开发一个退伍军人参与工具包。
J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Jun;7(6):595-602. doi: 10.2217/cer-2017-0101. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
10
Facilitators and barriers to implementation of Alberta family integrated care (FICare) in level II neonatal intensive care units: a qualitative process evaluation substudy of a multicentre cluster-randomised controlled trial using the consolidated framework for implementation research.促进和阻碍艾伯塔省家庭综合护理(FICare)在二级新生儿重症监护病房实施的因素:一项多中心整群随机对照试验的定性过程评估子研究,使用实施研究综合框架。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 18;11(10):e054938. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054938.

引用本文的文献

1
A Cluster Randomized Trial of Primary Care Practice Redesign to Integrate Behavioral Health for Those Who Need It Most: Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions.一项针对最需要的人群(患有多种慢性病的患者)进行的初级保健实践重新设计以整合行为健康服务的整群随机试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2023 Nov-Dec;21(6):483-495. doi: 10.1370/afm.3027.
2
Impact of patient partner co-design on survey development in primary care research: Case study.患者伙伴共同设计对初级保健研究中调查开发的影响:案例研究
Can Fam Physician. 2022 Mar;68(3):235-236. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6803235.
3
Responding to the Call: a New JGIM Area of Emphasis for Implementation and Quality Improvement Sciences.响应号召:《普通内科医学杂志》实施与质量改进科学的新重点领域
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):781-782. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06229-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Patient-centered Care: How Clinical Staff Overcome Barriers to Patient Engagement at the VHA.改善以患者为中心的护理:VHA 临床工作人员如何克服患者参与的障碍。
Med Care. 2018 Dec;56(12):1009-1017. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001007.
2
Creating a Toolkit to Reduce Disparities in Patient Engagement.创建一个减少患者参与度差异的工具包。
Med Care. 2017 Sep;55 Suppl 9 Suppl 2:S59-S69. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000748.
3
Determinants of patient satisfaction: a systematic review.患者满意度的决定因素:一项系统综述。
Perspect Public Health. 2017 Mar;137(2):89-101. doi: 10.1177/1757913916634136. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
4
Participatory Design and Development of a Patient-centered Toolkit to Engage Hospitalized Patients and Care Partners in their Plan of Care.以患者为中心的工具包的参与式设计与开发,以促使住院患者及其护理伙伴参与其护理计划。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014 Nov 14;2014:486-95. eCollection 2014.
5
The effectiveness of toolkits as knowledge translation strategies for integrating evidence into clinical care: a systematic review.作为将证据整合到临床护理中的知识转化策略的工具包的有效性:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 13;5(4):e006808. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006808.
6
Research and services partnerships: Responding to needs of clinical operations partners: transferring implementation facilitation knowledge and skills.研究与服务伙伴关系:响应临床运营伙伴的需求:传授实施促进知识与技能。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Feb 1;65(2):141-3. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300468.
7
Patient engagement as an emerging challenge for healthcare services: mapping the literature.患者参与作为医疗服务的一个新挑战:文献综述
Nurs Res Pract. 2012;2012:905934. doi: 10.1155/2012/905934. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
8
Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey.消费者评估医疗保健提供者和系统(CAHPS®)临床医生和成人团体就诊调查的心理测量特性。
Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl(Suppl):S28-34. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31826cbc0d.
9
Development of and field test results for the CAHPS PCMH Survey.CAHPS PCMH 调查的开发和现场测试结果。
Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl(Suppl):S2-10. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182610aba.
10
The effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies used in public health: a systematic review.知识转化策略在公共卫生中的有效性:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 7;12:751. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-751.