Department of Mechatronics and Biomedical Engineering, Lee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Department of Oncology, Cancer Research UK and Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Magn Reson Med. 2021 Apr;85(4):2188-2200. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28565. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
To assess the correlation and differences between common amide proton transfer (APT) quantification methods in the diagnosis of ischemic stroke.
Five APT quantification methods, including asymmetry analysis and its variants as well as two Lorentzian model-based methods, were applied to data acquired from six rats that underwent middle cerebral artery occlusion scanned at 9.4T. Diffusion and perfusion-weighted images, and water relaxation time maps were also acquired to study the relationship of these conventional imaging modalities with the different APT quantification methods.
The APT ischemic area estimates had varying sizes (Jaccard index: 0.544 ≤ J ≤ 0.971) and had varying correlations in their distributions (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.104 ≤ r ≤ 0.995), revealing discrepancies in the quantified ischemic areas. The Lorentzian methods produced the highest contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs; 1.427 ≤ CNR ≤ 2.002), but generated APT ischemic areas that were comparable in size to the cerebral blood flow (CBF) deficit areas; asymmetry analysis and its variants produced APT ischemic areas that were smaller than the CBF deficit areas but larger than the apparent diffusion coefficient deficit areas, though having lower CNRs (0.561 ≤ CNR ≤ 1.083).
There is a need to further investigate the accuracy and correlation of each quantification method with the pathophysiology using a larger scale multi-imaging modality and multi-time-point clinical study. Future studies should include the magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry results alongside the findings of the study to facilitate the comparison of results between different centers and also the published literature.
评估用于诊断缺血性中风的常见酰胺质子转移(APT)定量方法之间的相关性和差异。
将五种 APT 定量方法(包括不对称分析及其变体以及两种基于洛伦兹模型的方法)应用于在 9.4T 下扫描接受大脑中动脉闭塞的六只大鼠的数据中。还获取了扩散和灌注加权图像以及水弛豫时间图,以研究这些常规成像方式与不同 APT 定量方法之间的关系。
APT 缺血区域的估计大小不同(Jaccard 指数:0.544≤J≤0.971),其分布的相关性也不同(皮尔逊相关系数:0.104≤r≤0.995),表明量化的缺血区域存在差异。洛伦兹方法产生的对比噪声比(CNR;1.427≤CNR≤2.002)最高,但产生的 APT 缺血区域与脑血流量(CBF)缺损区域的大小相当;不对称分析及其变体产生的 APT 缺血区域小于 CBF 缺损区域,但大于表观扩散系数缺损区域,尽管 CNR 较低(0.561≤CNR≤1.083)。
需要使用更大规模的多成像模态和多时间点临床研究进一步研究每种定量方法与病理生理学的准确性和相关性。未来的研究应包括磁化转移率不对称结果,以促进不同中心之间以及已发表文献之间的结果比较。