• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙特阿拉伯王国肿瘤学领域健康效用的获取

Elicitation of Health Utilities in Oncology in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

作者信息

Iskedjian Michael, De Vol Edward, Elshenawy Mahmoud, Bazarbashi Shouki

机构信息

PharmIdeas USA, Williamsville, NY.

Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Oct;6:1609-1616. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00234.

DOI:10.1200/GO.20.00234
PMID:33108230
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7605366/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Health utilities (HUs) are quantitative measures of quality of life that are used to derive outcomes such as quality-adjusted life years in cost-effectiveness analyses. In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, there are no HUs for cancer. This study aimed to generate HU estimates for various health states associated with cancer in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

Adult citizens of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, patients with cancer, and patients without cancer were recruited to participate in an online version of the Time Trade-Off (TTO) survey, a direct method that asks participants to indicate the amount of time they are willing to trade off in return for full health. The time horizon was 10 years. Patients were surveyed on their own health state; patients without cancer were presented with a scenario describing stage III colon cancer and were asked to act as proxies.

RESULTS

Mean HU score was 0.398 (n = 398), 0.315 for patients with cancer (n = 199), and 0.482 for patients without cancer (n = 199). Among patients, the largest subgroup with colorectal cancer (n = 105), had a mean HU of 0.296; the subgroup with the lowest mean HU was patients with hepatocellular cancer (n = 3; 0.047), and the subgroup with the highest mean HU was patients with cholangiocarcinoma (n = 5; 0.508). Overall, the initial stage I subgroup (n = 7) had a mean HU of 0.456; initial stage II (n = 25), 0.240; stage II (n = 67), 0.319; and initial stage IV (n = 77), 0.320.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study of this size to elicit HU scores for cancer in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Patients may have had clinically worse disease than the patients in the scenario that was presented to patients without cancer. Further analyses are warranted for specific types of cancer. These HUs can in turn be applied in cost-utility analyses.

摘要

目的

健康效用值(HUs)是生活质量的定量衡量指标,用于在成本效益分析中得出诸如质量调整生命年等结果。在沙特阿拉伯王国,尚无癌症的健康效用值。本研究旨在得出沙特阿拉伯王国与癌症相关的各种健康状态的健康效用值估计数。

方法

招募沙特阿拉伯王国成年公民、癌症患者和非癌症患者参与在线时间权衡(TTO)调查,这是一种直接方法,要求参与者表明他们愿意用多少时间来换取完全健康。时间跨度为10年。对患者自身的健康状态进行调查;向非癌症患者呈现一个描述III期结肠癌的情景,并要求他们充当代理人。

结果

平均健康效用值得分为0.398(n = 398),癌症患者为0.315(n = 199),非癌症患者为0.482(n = 199)。在患者中,结直肠癌患者这一最大亚组(n = 105)的平均健康效用值为0.296;平均健康效用值最低的亚组是肝细胞癌患者(n = 3;0.047),平均健康效用值最高的亚组是胆管癌患者(n = 5;0.508)。总体而言,I期初始亚组(n = 7)的平均健康效用值为0.456;II期初始(n = 25)为0.240;II期(n = 67)为0.319;IV期初始(n = 77)为0.320。

结论

据我们所知,这是沙特阿拉伯王国首次进行如此规模的研究以得出癌症的健康效用值得分。患者的临床疾病状况可能比向非癌症患者呈现的情景中的患者更差。有必要对特定类型的癌症进行进一步分析。这些健康效用值反过来可应用于成本效用分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/195e/7605366/34967c14e8be/GO.20.00234f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/195e/7605366/2336ff364763/GO.20.00234f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/195e/7605366/a821f5bf87f6/GO.20.00234f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/195e/7605366/34967c14e8be/GO.20.00234f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/195e/7605366/2336ff364763/GO.20.00234f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/195e/7605366/a821f5bf87f6/GO.20.00234f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/195e/7605366/34967c14e8be/GO.20.00234f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Elicitation of Health Utilities in Oncology in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯王国肿瘤学领域健康效用的获取
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Oct;6:1609-1616. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00234.
2
Empirical Monetary Valuation of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Willingness-to-Pay Analysis.沙特阿拉伯王国质量调整生命年的实证货币估值:支付意愿分析。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2020 Dec;4(4):625-633. doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00211-0.
3
Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.头颈癌患者健康状态效用测量的比较
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Aug;141(8):696-703. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.1314.
4
Health-Related Predictors of Quality of Life in Cancer Patients in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯癌症患者生活质量的健康相关预测因素
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Oct;33(5):1011-1019. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1198-3.
5
A cross-sectional assessment of quality of life of colorectal cancer patients in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯结直肠癌患者生活质量的横断面评估。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2016 Feb;18(2):144-52. doi: 10.1007/s12094-015-1346-3. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
6
Cost-effectiveness of apixaban for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Saudi Arabia.阿哌沙班在沙特阿拉伯非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中预防卒中的成本效益分析
Ann Saudi Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;39(4):265-278. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2019.265. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
7
Ambient particulate matter burden of disease in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯王国的环境颗粒物疾病负担。
Environ Res. 2021 Jun;197:111036. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111036. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
8
A cross-sectional assessment of quality of life of breast cancer patients in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯乳腺癌患者生活质量的横断面评估。
Public Health. 2016 Jul;136:117-25. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
9
National Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Saudi Arabia with strength of recommendations and quality of evidence.沙特阿拉伯结直肠癌筛查国家指南,附推荐强度和证据质量说明。
Ann Saudi Med. 2015 May-Jun;35(3):189-95. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2015.189.
10
Quality of Life and Its Predictors Among Nursing Students in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯护理专业学生的生活质量及其预测因素
J Holist Nurs. 2019 Jun;37(2):200-208. doi: 10.1177/0898010118784147. Epub 2018 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
A mixed-method analysis to identify the current focus, trends, and gaps in health science research in Saudi Arabia.采用混合方法分析,明确沙特阿拉伯卫生科学研究的当前重点、趋势和差距。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;10:1028361. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1028361. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimation of population-based utility weights for gastric cancer-related health states.基于人群的胃癌相关健康状态效用权重估计。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 May 23;12:909-918. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S151946. eCollection 2018.
2
Estimation of utility weights for major liver diseases according to disease severity in Korea.根据韩国主要肝脏疾病的严重程度估算效用权重
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep 5;17(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0660-3.
3
Assessing health-state utility values in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a utility study in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.
评估转移性结直肠癌患者的健康状态效用值:英国和荷兰的一项效用研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Oct;29(10):1203-10. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1980-1. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
4
A Review and Meta-analysis of Colorectal Cancer Utilities.结直肠癌效用的综述与荟萃分析
Med Decis Making. 2014 Aug;34(6):809-18. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14536779. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
5
A reference set of health utilities for long-term survivors of prostate cancer: population-based data from Ontario, Canada.一组用于前列腺癌长期幸存者的健康效用参考值:来自加拿大安大略省的基于人群的数据。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Dec;22(10):2951-62. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0401-1. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
6
Elicitation of health state utilities in neuroendocrine tumours.神经内分泌肿瘤的健康状态效用值的评估。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(4):681-7. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.670175. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
7
Elicitation of utility scores in Canada for immune thrombocytopenia treated with romiplostim or watch and rescue.在加拿大,使用 romiplostim 或观察和抢救治疗免疫性血小板减少症的效用评分的推导。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(2):313-31. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.646045. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
8
A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs.一种用于评估医疗保健项目的效用最大化模型。
Health Serv Res. 1972 Summer;7(2):118-33.
9
Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life.测量健康相关生活质量的效用方法。
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):593-603. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90019-1.