Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Department of Preventive Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, 16499, Republic of Korea.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 27;20(1):979. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05778-2.
This study examines the effects of a shift in medical coverage, from National Health Insurance (NHI) to Medical Aid (MA), on health care utilization (measured by the number of outpatient visits and length of stay; LOS) and out-of-pocket medical expenses.
Data were collected from the Korean Welfare Panel Study (2010-2016). A total of 888 MA Type I beneficiaries and 221 MA Type II beneficiaries who shifted from the NHI were included as the case group and 2664 and 663 consecutive NHI holders (1:3 propensity score-matched) were included as the control group, respectively. We used the 'difference-in-differences' (DiD) analysis approach to assess changes in health care utilization and medical spending by the group members.
Differential average changes in outpatient visits in the MA Type I panel between the pre- and post-shift periods were significant, but differential changes in LOS were not found. Those who shifted from NHI to MA Type I had increased number of outpatient visits without changes in out-of-pocket spending, compared to consecutive NHI holder who had similar characteristics. However, this was not found for MA Type II beneficiaries.
Our research provides evidence that the shift in medical coverage from NHI to MA Type I increased the number of outpatient visits without increasing the out-of-pocket spending. Considering the problem of excess medical utilization by Korean MA Type I beneficiaries, further researches are required to have in-depth discussions on the appropriateness of the current cost-sharing level on MA beneficiaries.
本研究考察了医疗保障从国民健康保险(NHI)转为医疗援助(MA)对医疗服务利用(通过门诊就诊次数和住院天数衡量)和自付医疗费用的影响。
数据来自韩国福利面板研究(2010-2016 年)。共纳入 888 名 MA 型 I 受益人和 221 名 MA 型 II 受益人作为病例组,他们从 NHI 转为 MA;同时纳入 2664 名和 663 名连续的 NHI 持有者(按 1:3 倾向评分匹配)作为对照组。我们采用“差分法”(DiD)分析方法评估了两组医疗服务利用和医疗支出的变化。
MA 型 I 面板中,从 NHI 转为 MA 的患者在门诊就诊次数方面的差异平均变化在两个时期之间具有统计学意义,但在住院天数方面没有发现差异。与具有相似特征的连续 NHI 持有者相比,从 NHI 转为 MA 型 I 的患者门诊就诊次数增加,但自付支出没有变化。然而,MA 型 II 受益人的情况并非如此。
我们的研究结果表明,从 NHI 转为 MA 型 I 增加了门诊就诊次数,而自付支出没有增加。考虑到韩国 MA 型 I 受益人的过度医疗利用问题,需要进一步研究,深入讨论当前对 MA 受益人的费用分担水平是否合理。