Seo Jae-Sung, Bae Jung-Kwon, Shin Seong-Kee, Ryu Hyung-Gon, Kim Kyu Jin, Cho Seung Yeon
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul 02053, Republic of Korea.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 12;12(16):1601. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161601.
This study investigated whether differences in survival rates and clinical outcomes exist in patients undergoing TKA by insurance type: National Health Insurance (NHI) vs. Medical Aid Program (MAP). This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 762 TKAs (NHI, = 505; MAP, = 257) with a mean follow-up of 8.4 ± 1.8 years. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were evaluated using the American Knee Society's (AKS) score at the final follow-up. The survival rate of each group was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Any postoperative complications and readmissions within 90 days of discharge were recorded and compared between the groups. There were no between-group differences in pre- to postoperative improvement in AKS scores. The estimated 10-year survival rates were 98.5% in the NHI group and 96.9% in the MAP group, respectively, with no significant differences ( = 0.48). However, the length of hospital stay (LOS) was significantly longer in the MAP group than in the NHI group (13.4 days vs. 13.1 days, = 0.03), and the transfer rate to other departments was significantly higher in the MAP group than in the NHI group (3.9% vs. 1.4%, = 0.04). Readmission rates for orthopedic complications for 90 days were 3.0% in the NHI group and 3.5% in the MAP group, respectively ( = 0.67). Patients' insurance type showed similar survival rates and clinical outcomes to those of primary TKA at a mean follow-up of 8.4 years, but the LOS and rate of transfer to other departments during hospitalization were influenced by insurance type.
本研究调查了接受全膝关节置换术(TKA)的患者按保险类型(国民健康保险[NHI]与医疗救助计划[MAP])划分,在生存率和临床结局方面是否存在差异。本研究对762例全膝关节置换术进行了回顾性分析(NHI组505例;MAP组257例),平均随访时间为8.4±1.8年。在末次随访时,使用美国膝关节协会(AKS)评分评估患者报告结局(PROMs)。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析对每组的生存率进行分析。记录出院后90天内的任何术后并发症和再入院情况,并在两组之间进行比较。两组术前至术后AKS评分的改善情况无组间差异。NHI组和MAP组的估计10年生存率分别为98.5%和96.9%,无显著差异(P = 0.48)。然而,MAP组的住院时间(LOS)显著长于NHI组(13.4天对13.1天,P = 0.03),MAP组转至其他科室的比率显著高于NHI组(3.9%对1.4%,P = 0.04)。NHI组和MAP组90天骨科并发症的再入院率分别为3.0%和3.5%(P = 0.67)。在平均8.4年的随访中,患者的保险类型显示出与初次全膝关节置换术相似的生存率和临床结局,但住院期间的住院时间和转至其他科室的比率受保险类型影响。