• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠病毒(COVID-19)和互联网上的“免疫增强”:对谷歌搜索结果的内容分析。

COVID-19 and 'immune boosting' on the internet: a content analysis of Google search results.

机构信息

Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Health Law Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 26;10(10):e040989. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040989.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040989
PMID:33109677
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7592272/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The spread of misinformation has accompanied the coronavirus pandemic, including topics such as immune boosting to prevent COVID-19. This study explores how immune boosting is portrayed on the internet during the COVID-19 pandemic.

DESIGN

Content analysis.

METHODS

We compiled a dataset of 227 webpages from Google searches in Canada and the USA using the phrase 'boost immunity' AND 'coronavirus' on 1 April 2020. We coded webpages for typology and portrayal of immune boosting and supplements. We recorded mentions of microbiome, whether the webpage was selling or advertising an immune boosting product or service, and suggested strategies for boosting immunity.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between webpages that appeared in the searches in Canada and the USA. The most common types of webpages were from news (40.5%) and commercial (24.7%) websites. The concept of immune boosting was portrayed as beneficial for avoiding COVID-19 in 85.5% of webpages and supplements were portrayed as beneficial in 40% of the webpages, but commercial sites were more likely to have these portrayals. The top immune boosting strategies were vitamin C (34.8%), diet (34.4%), sleep (34.4%), exercise (30.8%) and zinc (26.9%). Less than 10% of the webpages provide any critique of the concept of immune boosting.

CONCLUSIONS

Pairing evidence-based advice for maintaining one's health (eg, healthy diet, exercise, sleep) with the phrase immune boosting and strategies lacking in evidence may inadvertently help to legitimise the concept, making it a powerful marketing tool. Results demonstrate how the spread of misinformation is complex and often more subtle than blatant fraudulent claims.

摘要

目的

新冠疫情期间,错误信息广泛传播,包括增强免疫力以预防 COVID-19 等话题。本研究探讨了在新冠疫情期间,互联网上是如何描述增强免疫力的。

设计

内容分析。

方法

我们于 2020 年 4 月 1 日在加拿大和美国使用“boost immunity”和“coronavirus”这两个短语在谷歌搜索中编制了一个包含 227 个网页的数据集。我们对网页的分类和增强免疫力及补充剂的描述进行了编码。我们记录了微生物组的提及情况、网页是否在销售或宣传增强免疫力的产品或服务,以及增强免疫力的建议策略。

结果

加拿大和美国搜索结果中的网页之间没有发现显著差异。最常见的网页类型是新闻(40.5%)和商业(24.7%)网站。增强免疫力的概念在 85.5%的网页中被描述为有助于预防 COVID-19,而在 40%的网页中补充剂被描述为有益,但商业网站更有可能有这些描述。顶级的增强免疫力策略是维生素 C(34.8%)、饮食(34.4%)、睡眠(34.4%)、运动(30.8%)和锌(26.9%)。不到 10%的网页对增强免疫力的概念提出任何批评。

结论

将保持健康的循证建议(如健康饮食、运动、睡眠)与缺乏证据的增强免疫力的说法结合起来,可能会无意中帮助使这个概念合法化,使其成为一个强大的营销工具。研究结果表明,错误信息的传播是复杂的,而且往往比明显的欺诈性声明更微妙。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d884/7592272/61dc53e2addb/bmjopen-2020-040989f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d884/7592272/61dc53e2addb/bmjopen-2020-040989f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d884/7592272/61dc53e2addb/bmjopen-2020-040989f01.jpg

相似文献

1
COVID-19 and 'immune boosting' on the internet: a content analysis of Google search results.新冠病毒(COVID-19)和互联网上的“免疫增强”:对谷歌搜索结果的内容分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 26;10(10):e040989. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040989.
2
Misinformation about spinal manipulation and boosting immunity: an analysis of Twitter activity during the COVID-19 crisis.关于脊柱推拿与增强免疫力的错误信息:对新冠疫情危机期间推特活动的分析
Chiropr Man Therap. 2020 Jun 9;28(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12998-020-00319-4.
3
COVID-19 prevention and treatment information on the internet: a systematic analysis and quality assessment.互联网上的新型冠状病毒肺炎防治信息:系统分析与质量评估
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 10;10(9):e040487. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040487.
4
Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study.互联网上关于 COVID-19 的错误信息:信息流行病学研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Apr 9;6(2):e18444. doi: 10.2196/18444.
5
Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries.在线 COVID-19 健康信息的易读性:四个英语国家之间的比较。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 13;20(1):1635. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09710-5.
6
Information Disclosure During the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: City-Level Observational Study.中国新冠疫情期间的信息披露:城市层面的观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 27;22(8):e19572. doi: 10.2196/19572.
7
The Parallel Pandemic: Medical Misinformation and COVID-19 : Primum non nocere.并行的大流行:医学错误信息与新冠疫情:首要的是不伤害。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):2435-2436. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05897-w. Epub 2020 May 14.
8
COVID-19 and the newly rediscovered multidisciplinarity.新冠疫情与新发现的多学科交叉性
Immunotherapy. 2020 Oct;12(15):1101-1103. doi: 10.2217/imt-2020-0205. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
9
COVID-19-Related Web Search Behaviors and Infodemic Attitudes in Italy: Infodemiological Study.意大利与 COVID-19 相关的网络搜索行为和信息疫情态度:信息疫情研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 May 5;6(2):e19374. doi: 10.2196/19374.
10
Global Infodemiology of COVID-19: Analysis of Google Web Searches and Instagram Hashtags.新型冠状病毒肺炎的全球信息流行病学:谷歌网络搜索和照片墙主题标签分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 25;22(8):e20673. doi: 10.2196/20673.

引用本文的文献

1
Anti-masking Posts on Instagram: Content Analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Instagram上的反口罩帖子:COVID-19大流行期间的内容分析
Saf Health Work. 2025 Mar;16(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2024.11.002. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
2
Racial/ethnic inequities in potentially harmful supplement use: Results of a prospective US cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic.潜在有害补充剂使用中的种族/族裔不平等:COVID-19大流行期间美国一项前瞻性队列研究的结果。
Public Health. 2025 Mar;240:104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.12.054. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
3
Do you have depression? A summative content analysis of mental health-related content on TikTok.

本文引用的文献

1
Internet Searches for Unproven COVID-19 Therapies in the United States.互联网上对未经证实的新冠病毒治疗方法的搜索情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Aug 1;180(8):1116-1118. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1764.
2
Infodemic and Risk Communication in the Era of CoV-19.新冠疫情时代的信息疫情与风险沟通
Adv Biomed Res. 2020 Mar 11;9:10. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_47_20. eCollection 2020.
3
COVID-19 infection: the perspectives on immune responses.新型冠状病毒肺炎感染:免疫反应的观点
你是否患有抑郁症?TikTok上与心理健康相关内容的总结性内容分析。
Digit Health. 2025 Jan 17;11:20552076241297062. doi: 10.1177/20552076241297062. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Factors that contributed to Ontario adults' mental health during the first 16 months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a decision tree analysis.导致安大略省成年人在 COVID-19 大流行的头 16 个月期间心理健康的因素:决策树分析。
PeerJ. 2024 Mar 29;12:e17193. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17193. eCollection 2024.
5
Nurses' use of 'wellness' supplements during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.美国护士在新冠疫情期间使用“健康”补充剂的情况。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Nov;80(11):4572-4583. doi: 10.1111/jan.16162. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
6
Businesses marketing purported stem cell treatments and exosome therapies for COVID-19: An analysis of direct-to-consumer online advertising claims.针对 COVID-19 的所谓干细胞治疗和外泌体疗法的商业营销:对直接面向消费者的在线广告声明的分析。
Stem Cell Reports. 2023 Nov 14;18(11):2010-2015. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.09.015. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
7
Performance-Based Measurement of eHealth Literacy: Systematic Scoping Review.基于绩效的电子健康素养测量:系统范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 2;25:e44602. doi: 10.2196/44602.
8
Quality and accuracy of online nutrition-related information: a systematic review of content analysis studies.在线营养相关信息的质量和准确性:内容分析研究的系统评价。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Jul;26(7):1345-1357. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023000873. Epub 2023 May 4.
9
The use of herbal and dietary supplements for COVID-19 prevention: A survey among the public in a Malaysian suburban town.使用草药和膳食补充剂预防新冠病毒:对马来西亚一个郊区城镇公众的一项调查。
J Herb Med. 2023 Jun;39:100650. doi: 10.1016/j.hermed.2023.100650. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
10
Financial precarity, food insecurity, and psychological distress prospectively linked with use of potentially dangerous dietary supplements during the pandemic in the US.在疫情期间,美国经济不稳定、食品无保障和心理困扰与使用潜在危险膳食补充剂之间存在前瞻性关联。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;11:1120942. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1120942. eCollection 2023.
Cell Death Differ. 2020 May;27(5):1451-1454. doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-0530-3. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
4
The pandemic of social media panic travels faster than the COVID-19 outbreak.社交媒体恐慌的传播速度比新冠疫情的爆发还要快。
J Travel Med. 2020 May 18;27(3). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa031.
5
How to fight an infodemic.如何应对信息疫情。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):676. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X.
6
"Tobacco and Water": Testing the Health Halo Effect of Natural American Spirit Cigarette Ads and Its Relationship with Perceived Absolute Harm and Use Intentions.“烟草与水”:检验自然美国精神香烟广告的健康光环效应及其与绝对危害感知和使用意愿的关系。
Health Commun. 2021 Jun;36(7):804-815. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1712526. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
7
Boosting the Immune System, From Science to Myth: Analysis the Infosphere With Google.增强免疫系统:从科学到神话——用谷歌分析信息圈
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Jul 25;6:165. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00165. eCollection 2019.
8
Promotion of Testing for Celiac Disease and the Gluten-Free Diet Among Complementary and Alternative Medicine Practitioners.推广乳糜泻检测和无麸质饮食在补充和替代医学从业者中。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 May;114(5):786-791. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000238.
9
Prevalence of Dietary Supplement Use in US Children and Adolescents, 2003-2014.2003-2014 年美国儿童和青少年膳食补充剂使用情况的流行率。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Aug 1;172(8):780-782. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1008.
10
Exploiting science? A systematic analysis of complementary and alternative medicine clinic websites' marketing of stem cell therapies.利用科学?对补充和替代医学诊所网站上干细胞疗法营销的系统分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 28;8(2):e019414. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019414.