Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Health Commun. 2021 Jun;36(7):804-815. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1712526. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
In 2015, the FDA formally warned Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company that their "natural" and "additive-free" claims for its Natural American Spirit cigarettes conveyed reduced harm to consumers. In a settlement, Santa Fe was allowed to continue using the word "natural" in the brand name and the phrase "tobacco and water". The company also uses eco-friendly language and plant imagery and these tactics have also been shown to communicate reduced product harm. In this study, we propose the health halo effect as an overarching framework for explaining how these ad tactics mislead consumers in an effort to provide more comprehensive guidance for regulatory action. In a between-subjects experiment, 1,577 US young adults, ages 18-24, were randomly assigned to view one of five Natural American Spirit cigarette ads featuring either: 1) eco-friendly language; 2) plant imagery; 3) the phrase "tobacco and water"; 4) all of these tactics; or 5) a control condition featuring none of these tactics. In line with past research, ads with the phrase "tobacco and water" or with all the tactics together (vs. control) created a health halo effect, increasing perceptions that Natural American Spirit cigarettes were healthier and had less potential to cause disease; these tactics also had an indirect positive effect on smoking intentions through reduced perceptions of the brand's potential to cause disease and perceived absolute harm. Inconsistent with prior work, the eco-friendly language and plant imagery (vs. control) reduced healthfulness perceptions, increased perceptions of absolute harm, and had an indirect negative effect on smoking intentions. We contribute to past research showing that Natural American Spirit cigarette ad tactics mislead consumers. Inconsistent findings are explained in terms of stimuli design and processing of message features, indices of relative message persuasiveness, and multiple versus single-message designs.
2015 年,美国食品和药物管理局正式警告圣达菲天然烟草公司,称其“天然”和“无添加剂”的自然美国精神香烟声称对消费者的危害降低。在和解协议中,圣达菲获准继续在品牌名称和“烟草和水”短语中使用“天然”一词。该公司还使用环保语言和植物图像,这些策略也被证明可以传达降低产品危害的信息。在这项研究中,我们提出健康光环效应作为一个总体框架,以解释这些广告策略如何误导消费者,从而为监管行动提供更全面的指导。在一项 1577 名美国 18-24 岁年轻成年人的被试间实验中,参与者被随机分配观看五种自然美国精神香烟广告中的一种,这些广告分别展示了:1)环保语言;2)植物图像;3)“烟草和水”短语;4)所有这些策略;或 5)没有这些策略的控制条件。与过去的研究一致,带有“烟草和水”短语或所有策略一起(与控制条件相比)的广告产生了健康光环效应,增加了人们对自然美国精神香烟更健康、潜在疾病风险更小的认知;这些策略还通过降低人们对品牌潜在疾病风险的认知和感知的绝对危害,对吸烟意图产生了间接的积极影响。与之前的工作不一致的是,环保语言和植物图像(与控制条件相比)降低了健康感知,增加了绝对危害的感知,并对吸烟意图产生了间接的负面影响。我们为过去的研究做出了贡献,表明自然美国精神香烟广告策略误导了消费者。不一致的发现可以用刺激设计和信息特征的处理、相对信息说服力的指标、以及多信息与单信息设计来解释。