Suppr超能文献

慢性主动脉瓣反流中二叶瓣和三叶瓣主动脉瓣的当代差异。

Contemporary differences between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve in chronic aortic regurgitation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minnesota, Rochester, New York, USA.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Heart. 2021 Jun;107(11):916-924. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317466. Epub 2020 Oct 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively explore contemporary differences between bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients with chronic haemodynamically significant aortic regurgitation (AR).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with chronic ≥moderate-severe AR from a tertiary referral centre (2006-2017) were included. All-cause mortality, surgical indications and aortic valve surgery (AVS) were analysed.

RESULTS

Of 798 patients (296 BAV-AR, age 46±14 years; 502 TAV-AR, age 67±14 years, p<0.0001) followed for 5.5 (IQR: 2.9-9.2) years, 403 underwent AVS (repair in 96) and 154 died during follow-up. The 8-year AVS incidence was 60%±3% versus 53%±3% for BAV-AR and TAV-AR, respectively (p=0.014). The unadjusted (real-life) 8-year total survival was 93%±7% versus 71%±2% for BAV-AR and TAV-AR, respectively (p<0.0001), and became statistically insignificant after sole adjustment for age (p=0.14). The within-group relative risk of death in BAV-AR patients demonstrated a large age-dependent increase (two fold at 50-55 years, up to 10-fold at 70 years). The presence of baseline symptoms was significantly associated with death for both BAV-AR (p=0.039) and TAV-AR (p<0.0001), but the strength of the association decreased with age adjustment for BAV-AR (age-adjusted HR 2.43 (0.92-6.39), p=0.07) and not for TAV-AR (age-adjusted HR, 2.3 (1.6-3.3), p<0.0001). As compared with general population, TAV-AR exhibited baseline excess risk which further increased at left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <60% and left ventricular end-systolic dimension index (LVESDi) >20 mm/m; similar thresholds were observed for BAV-AR patients.

CONCLUSION

BAV-AR patients were two decades younger than TAV-AR and underwent AVS more frequently, resulting in a considerable real-life survival advantage for BAV-AR that was determined primarily by age and not valve anatomy. Pragmatically, regardless of valve anatomy, patients with haemodynamically significant AR and age >50-55 years require a low-threshold for surgical referral to prevent symptom development where LVEF <60% and LVESDi >20 mm/m seem appropriate referral thresholds.

摘要

目的

全面探讨慢性血流动力学重度主动脉瓣反流(AR)患者中二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)和三叶式主动脉瓣(TAV)患者之间的当代差异。

方法

纳入了一家三级转诊中心(2006-2017 年)连续出现慢性≥中度重度 AR 的患者。分析了全因死亡率、手术适应证和主动脉瓣手术(AVS)。

结果

在随访 5.5 年(IQR:2.9-9.2)的 798 例患者(296 例 BAV-AR,年龄 46±14 岁;502 例 TAV-AR,年龄 67±14 岁,p<0.0001)中,403 例接受了 AVS(96 例为修复),154 例在随访期间死亡。BAV-AR 和 TAV-AR 的 8 年 AVS 发生率分别为 60%±3%和 53%±3%(p=0.014)。BAV-AR 和 TAV-AR 的未经调整(真实生活)8 年总生存率分别为 93%±7%和 71%±2%(p<0.0001),但仅调整年龄后无统计学意义(p=0.14)。BAV-AR 患者的死亡相对风险随年龄的增加而显著增加(50-55 岁时增加两倍,70 岁时增加十倍)。BAV-AR 和 TAV-AR 患者的基线症状均与死亡显著相关(p=0.039 和 p<0.0001),但 BAV-AR 的相关性随着年龄调整而减弱(年龄调整后 HR 2.43(0.92-6.39),p=0.07),而 TAV-AR 则没有(年龄调整后 HR 2.3(1.6-3.3),p<0.0001)。与一般人群相比,TAV-AR 的基线风险增加,左心室射血分数(LVEF)<60%和左心室收缩末期内径指数(LVESDi)>20 mm/m 时进一步增加;BAV-AR 患者也观察到了类似的阈值。

结论

BAV-AR 患者比 TAV-AR 年轻二十岁,更频繁地接受 AVS,这导致 BAV-AR 的真实生活生存率有了显著的优势,这种优势主要由年龄决定,而不是瓣膜解剖结构。实际上,无论瓣膜解剖结构如何,年龄>50-55 岁且出现血流动力学重度 AR 的患者需要进行低门槛的手术转诊,以预防症状发展,而 LVEF<60%和 LVESDi>20 mm/m 似乎是适当的转诊阈值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验