Anna Mortzfeldt practices in urology at Wellspan Health in Chambersburg, Pa. The author has disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
JAAPA. 2020 Nov;33(11):10-13. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000718264.76485.bc.
This article reviews the prostatic urethral lift (PUL) and its potential benefits and risks compared with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). TURP is the traditional procedure for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and is associated with ejaculatory and erectile dysfunction. PUL is a minimally invasive option, but its efficacy has not been well studied. A literature review indicates that both procedures should be afforded equal consideration, and both have limitations. Further long-term research is needed to establish if PUL is superior to TURP.
本文回顾了前列腺尿道提升术(PUL)及其与经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)相比的潜在益处和风险。TURP 是治疗良性前列腺增生症(BPH)的传统方法,与射精和勃起功能障碍有关。PUL 是一种微创选择,但它的疗效尚未得到很好的研究。文献回顾表明,这两种方法都应得到同等考虑,并且都有局限性。需要进一步的长期研究来确定 PUL 是否优于 TURP。