Suppr超能文献

黏接增强剂对黏附于脱黏牙齿表面的新型托槽剪切黏接强度的影响——一项研究

Effect of Adhesion Boosters on the Shear Bond Strength of New Brackets Bonded to a Debonded Tooth Surface - An Study.

作者信息

Madaparambil Vidya, Antony Vincy, Menon Vineeth, Nayaz Mohamed, Jasim Gazanafer Roshan Mohamed

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, MES Dental College, Malappuram, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Dent. 2020 Jan-Mar;11(1):46-50. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_461_19. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Effect of adhesion boosters on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

AIM

The aim is to evaluate the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI) score of new brackets bonded to a debonded tooth surface with and without the use of adhesion boosters.

SETTINGS AND DESIGNS

comparative study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adhesion boosters: Enhance LC (Reliance, Itasca III) All Bond 2 (Bisco, Schaumsburg) and the Composite adhesives Transbond XT (3M UNITEK) Enlight (ORMCO) were used in this study. One hundred and eight extracted maxillary first premolar teeth were bonded with light cure composite to etched tooth surface. The brackets were then debonded with debonding pliers after 1 week and it was polished with low speed tungston carbide bur and rubber cup. The teeth were divided into six groups and they were etched, washed, and dried again. New brackets were rebonded to the tooth surface using composites with or without adhesion boosters. Then, the shear bond strength value was calculated for each bracket with a universal testing machine. ARI scores were also evaluated.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

One-way ANOVA and least significant difference test was used for the association between variables. Probability value ( < 0.05) was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The results showed a statistically significant difference between the groups with a < 0.001. There was no significant difference in ARI scores between the groups ( = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the adhesion boosters significantly improved the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. There was no statistically significant difference in the ARI scores.

摘要

背景

粘结增强剂对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。

目的

评估在使用和不使用粘结增强剂的情况下,新托槽粘结到脱粘牙面上的剪切粘结强度和粘结残留指数(ARI)评分。

设置与设计

对比研究。

材料与方法

本研究使用了粘结增强剂Enhance LC(Reliance,伊塔斯卡三世)、全粘结剂2(Bisco,绍姆堡)以及复合粘结剂Transbond XT(3M UNITEK)、Enlight(奥美科)。108颗拔除的上颌第一前磨牙用光固化复合材料粘结到酸蚀后的牙面上。1周后用脱粘钳将托槽取下,并用低速碳化钨车针和橡胶杯进行抛光。将牙齿分为六组,再次进行酸蚀、冲洗和干燥。使用含或不含粘结增强剂的复合材料将新托槽重新粘结到牙面上。然后,用万能试验机计算每个托槽的剪切粘结强度值。同时评估ARI评分。

所用统计分析方法

采用单因素方差分析和最小显著差检验来分析变量之间的相关性。概率值(<0.05)被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

结果显示组间差异具有统计学意义(<0.001)。各组间ARI评分无显著差异(=0.15)。

结论

两种粘结增强剂均显著提高了正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度。ARI评分无统计学显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fca/7580753/0effd5eebb53/CCD-11-46-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验