Madaparambil Vidya, Antony Vincy, Menon Vineeth, Nayaz Mohamed, Jasim Gazanafer Roshan Mohamed
Department of Orthodontics, MES Dental College, Malappuram, Kerala, India.
Contemp Clin Dent. 2020 Jan-Mar;11(1):46-50. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_461_19. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
Effect of adhesion boosters on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
The aim is to evaluate the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI) score of new brackets bonded to a debonded tooth surface with and without the use of adhesion boosters.
comparative study.
Adhesion boosters: Enhance LC (Reliance, Itasca III) All Bond 2 (Bisco, Schaumsburg) and the Composite adhesives Transbond XT (3M UNITEK) Enlight (ORMCO) were used in this study. One hundred and eight extracted maxillary first premolar teeth were bonded with light cure composite to etched tooth surface. The brackets were then debonded with debonding pliers after 1 week and it was polished with low speed tungston carbide bur and rubber cup. The teeth were divided into six groups and they were etched, washed, and dried again. New brackets were rebonded to the tooth surface using composites with or without adhesion boosters. Then, the shear bond strength value was calculated for each bracket with a universal testing machine. ARI scores were also evaluated.
One-way ANOVA and least significant difference test was used for the association between variables. Probability value ( < 0.05) was considered statistically significant.
The results showed a statistically significant difference between the groups with a < 0.001. There was no significant difference in ARI scores between the groups ( = 0.15).
Both the adhesion boosters significantly improved the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. There was no statistically significant difference in the ARI scores.
粘结增强剂对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
评估在使用和不使用粘结增强剂的情况下,新托槽粘结到脱粘牙面上的剪切粘结强度和粘结残留指数(ARI)评分。
对比研究。
本研究使用了粘结增强剂Enhance LC(Reliance,伊塔斯卡三世)、全粘结剂2(Bisco,绍姆堡)以及复合粘结剂Transbond XT(3M UNITEK)、Enlight(奥美科)。108颗拔除的上颌第一前磨牙用光固化复合材料粘结到酸蚀后的牙面上。1周后用脱粘钳将托槽取下,并用低速碳化钨车针和橡胶杯进行抛光。将牙齿分为六组,再次进行酸蚀、冲洗和干燥。使用含或不含粘结增强剂的复合材料将新托槽重新粘结到牙面上。然后,用万能试验机计算每个托槽的剪切粘结强度值。同时评估ARI评分。
采用单因素方差分析和最小显著差检验来分析变量之间的相关性。概率值(<0.05)被认为具有统计学意义。
结果显示组间差异具有统计学意义(<0.001)。各组间ARI评分无显著差异(=0.15)。
两种粘结增强剂均显著提高了正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度。ARI评分无统计学显著差异。