Ghosh Dibakar, Bhardwaj Shweta, Koyalada Soujanya, Mahajan Bela, Verma Sumit, Nayak Bikash
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, RRK Dental College and Hospital, Akola, Maharashtra, India.
BDS, MPH, Calgary, Canada.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Aug 25;9(8):4139-4144. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_534_20. eCollection 2020 Aug.
Surgical extraction of mandibular third molars is an important and one of the most frequently performed operative procedures in dentistry. There are a variety of postoperative complications that may follow this procedure. These include pain, trismus, infection, dry socket, or alveolar osteitis. Numerous techniques have been used for reducing these morbid conditions. These range from flap designs, suture placement, use of various irrigating solutions, etc.
The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three irrigating solutions: Ozonated water, normal saline, and povidone-iodine in reducing postoperative complications following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars.
A total of 100 study participants formed the sample size of this study. Study subjects were categorized into three groups: Group I (third molar surgeries using ozonated water), Group II (third molar surgeries with normal saline irrigation), and Group III (third molar surgeries using povidone-iodine irrigation). Parameters studied postoperatively were alveolar osteitis (dry socket), pain, trismus, and infection after a week interval. All data obtained were entered in Microsoft Excel 2007 worksheets and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) as a statistical tool was employed. A value of < 0.01 was considered statistically significant.
It was found that ozonated water provided the best statistically proven results with comparison to normal saline and povidone-iodine in reducing the incidence of alveolar osteitis or dry socket and pain. No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of trismus and infection rate among three studied groups.
Ozonated water is the best irrigating solution when compared to normal saline and povidone-iodine in terms of reduction in pain and dry socket after a 1-week duration.
下颌第三磨牙的外科拔除是牙科领域一项重要且最常开展的手术操作之一。该手术后可能会出现多种并发症,包括疼痛、牙关紧闭、感染、干槽症或牙槽骨炎。为减少这些不良状况,人们使用了多种技术,包括瓣设计、缝线放置、使用各种冲洗液等。
本研究旨在比较三种冲洗液——臭氧水、生理盐水和聚维酮碘在减少下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术后并发症方面的有效性。
本研究共纳入100名研究参与者作为样本量。研究对象分为三组:第一组(使用臭氧水进行第三磨牙手术)、第二组(用生理盐水冲洗进行第三磨牙手术)和第三组(使用聚维酮碘冲洗进行第三磨牙手术)。术后研究的参数为一周后的牙槽骨炎(干槽症)、疼痛、牙关紧闭和感染情况。将获得的所有数据录入Microsoft Excel 2007工作表,并采用方差分析(ANOVA)作为统计工具。P值<0.01被认为具有统计学意义。
研究发现,与生理盐水和聚维酮碘相比,臭氧水在降低牙槽骨炎或干槽症及疼痛发生率方面具有统计学上经证实的最佳效果。在三个研究组中,牙关紧闭发生率和感染率未观察到统计学上的显著差异。
与生理盐水和聚维酮碘相比,就术后1周时减轻疼痛和干槽症而言,臭氧水是最佳冲洗液。