研究不端行为投诉与制度逻辑：以汉斯·艾森克和英国心理学会为例。
Research misconduct complaints and institutional logics: The case of Hans Eysenck and the British Psychological Society.
机构信息
University of Durham, Faculty of Business, Durham, UK.
Priory Hospital Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
出版信息
J Health Psychol. 2021 Feb;26(2):296-311. doi: 10.1177/1359105320963542. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
A formal complaint was lodged with the British Psychological Society in 1995 that alleged serious scientific misconduct by Hans J Eysenck. The complaint referred to research into the links between personality traits and the causes, prevention and treatment of cancer and heart disease. Using a framework of institutional logics, we criticise the Society's decision not to hear this complaint at a full disciplinary hearing. We urge the BPS to investigate this complaint afresh. We also support calls for the establishment of an independent National Research Integrity Ombudsperson to deal more effectively with allegations of research misconduct.
1995 年，英国心理学会收到了一份正式投诉，指控汉斯·艾森克（Hans J Eysenck）存在严重的科学不端行为。该投诉涉及人格特质与癌症和心脏病的病因、预防和治疗之间的关联研究。我们使用制度逻辑框架，批评学会未对此投诉进行全面纪律听证的决定。我们敦促 BPS 重新对此投诉进行调查。我们还支持设立独立的国家研究诚信监察员的呼吁，以更有效地处理研究不端行为的指控。
Zotero 插件