• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

锥形束 CT 与传统多层螺旋 CT 在颧骨种植术中实时导航的准确性比较。

Comparative accuracy of cone-beam CT and conventional multislice computed tomography for real-time navigation in zygomatic implant surgery.

机构信息

Department of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.

Department of Oral Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Dec;22(6):747-755. doi: 10.1111/cid.12958. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1111/cid.12958
PMID:33112508
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and conventional multislice CT (MSCT) are both used in zygomatic implant navigation surgery but the superiority of one technique versus the other remains unclear.

PURPOSE

This study compared the accuracy of CBCT and MSCT in zygomatic implant navigation surgery by calculating the deviations of implants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with severely atrophic maxillae were classified into two groups according to the use of CBCT- or MSCT-guided navigation system. The entry and apical distance deviation, and the angle deviation of zygomatic implants were measured on fused operation images. A linear effect model was used for analysis, with statistical significance set at P < .05.

RESULTS

A total of 72 zygomatic implants were inserted as planned in 23 patients. The comparison of deviations in CBCT and MSCT groups showed a mean (± SD) entry deviation of 1.69 ± 0.59 mm vs 2.04 ± 0.78 mm (P = .146), apical deviation of 2 ± 0.68 mm vs 2.55 ± 0.85 (P < .001), and angle deviation of 2.32 ± 1.02° vs 3.23 ± 1.21° (P = .038).

CONCLUSION

Real-time zygomatic implant navigation surgery with CBCT may result in higher values for accuracy than MSCT.

摘要

背景

锥形束 CT(CBCT)和传统多层 CT(MSCT)均可用于颧骨种植导航手术,但一种技术优于另一种技术的优势尚不清楚。

目的

本研究通过测量种植体的偏差,比较 CBCT 和 MSCT 在颧骨种植导航手术中的准确性。

材料与方法

根据使用 CBCT 或 MSCT 引导导航系统,将严重上颌骨萎缩的患者分为两组。在融合手术图像上测量颧种植体的入口和根尖距离偏差以及角度偏差。采用线性效应模型进行分析,以 P <.05 为统计学意义标准。

结果

23 例患者共计划植入 72 枚颧骨种植体。CBCT 组和 MSCT 组偏差的比较显示,入口偏差的平均值(±标准差)分别为 1.69±0.59mm 和 2.04±0.78mm(P =.146),根尖偏差分别为 2.0±0.68mm 和 2.55±0.85mm(P <.001),角度偏差分别为 2.32±1.02°和 3.23±1.21°(P =.038)。

结论

与 MSCT 相比,实时颧骨种植导航手术中使用 CBCT 可能会获得更高的准确性值。

相似文献

1
Comparative accuracy of cone-beam CT and conventional multislice computed tomography for real-time navigation in zygomatic implant surgery.锥形束 CT 与传统多层螺旋 CT 在颧骨种植术中实时导航的准确性比较。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Dec;22(6):747-755. doi: 10.1111/cid.12958. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
2
[Accuracy and clinical outcome of a real-time surgical navigation system for the placement of quad zygomatic implants].[用于植入四块颧骨种植体的实时手术导航系统的准确性及临床结果]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Nov 9;55(11):845-850. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20200614-00343.
3
Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants.计算机辅助静态和动态导航系统在颧骨牙科种植体植入中的准确性。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Mar 15;23(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02856-9.
4
Dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: A randomized clinical study comparing the flapless versus the conventional approach.颧种植体植入的动态导航:一项比较无瓣法与传统方法的随机临床研究。
J Dent. 2023 Mar;130:104436. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104436. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
5
Comparison of cone-beam and conventional multislice computed tomography for image-guided dental implant planning.锥形束和传统多层计算机断层扫描在图像引导牙科种植体规划中的比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Jan;17(1):317-24. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0704-6. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
6
Accuracy of a real-time surgical navigation system for the placement of quad zygomatic implants in the severe atrophic maxilla: A pilot clinical study.实时手术导航系统在严重萎缩上颌骨中植入 Quad Zygomatic 种植体的准确性:一项初步临床研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Jun;19(3):458-465. doi: 10.1111/cid.12475. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
7
[The clinical value of multislice CT for measuring the anatomical position of the mandibular nerve canal].多层螺旋CT测量下颌神经管解剖位置的临床价值
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2023 Jun;32(3):314-317.
8
Three-Dimensional Evaluation of the Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Through an In-House Fully Guided Approach.通过内部全引导方法对颧种植体植入准确性的三维评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 Jul-Aug;38(4):747-756. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10045.
9
Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.私人诊所中动态牙种植导航系统的准确性
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 January/February;34(1):205–213. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6966. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
10
Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter?基于三维光学扫描和立体光刻导板的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造引导种植手术中锥束计算机断层扫描与多层螺旋计算机断层扫描的比较:成像方式重要吗?
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 May-Jun;31(3):527-33. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4222.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery for Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Systematic Review.用于颧骨种植体植入的动态计算机辅助手术:一项系统评价。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1229-S1232. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1640_24. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
Accuracy and efficiency of drilling trajectories with augmented reality versus conventional navigation randomized crossover trial.增强现实与传统导航下钻孔轨迹的准确性和效率:随机交叉试验
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Nov 10;7(1):316. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01314-2.
3
A modified protocol merging two published techniques for computer guided zygomatic implants surgery: a technical note.
改良方案整合了两种发表的计算机引导颧骨种植手术技术:技术说明。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1273. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05010-1.
4
The Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Assisted by Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.动态计算机辅助手术辅助颧骨种植体植入的准确性:系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 21;12(16):5418. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165418.
5
Indications for zygomatic implants: a systematic review.颧骨种植体的适应证:系统评价。
Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Jul 1;9(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00480-4.
6
Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants.计算机辅助静态和动态导航系统在颧骨牙科种植体植入中的准确性。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Mar 15;23(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02856-9.
7
Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement.颧骨种植体植入术中动态导航的可靠性和准确性。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Apr;33(4):362-376. doi: 10.1111/clr.13897. Epub 2022 Feb 15.