• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于颧骨种植体植入的动态计算机辅助手术:一项系统评价。

Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery for Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Sharan Smitha, Venkatachalapathy Sri R, Walia Nidhi, Sayed Arshad J, Priyanka Lakshmi, Gnanasagar W R

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics Including Crown and Bridge, Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Department of Dentistry, Trichy SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1229-S1232. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1640_24. Epub 2025 Jun 18.

DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1640_24
PMID:40655835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12244975/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic computer-aided surgery (DCAS) for zygomatic implant placement by analyzing implant placement accuracy, clinical outcomes, and postoperative complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search of databases was conducted on studies published between 2000 and 2024 comparing DCAS-assisted zygomatic implant placement with traditional methods, extracting data and assessing quality.

RESULTS

Five studies were included. DCAS significantly enhances implant placement accuracy, reduces complications, and increases patient satisfaction, with robotic systems demonstrating superior accuracy and stability compared to dynamic navigation systems.

CONCLUSION

DCAS offers a promising approach for zygomatic implant placement, enhancing accuracy, safety, and patient outcomes. Further research is needed to explore long-term benefits and limitations.

摘要

目的

本系统评价旨在通过分析种植体植入准确性、临床结果和术后并发症,评估动态计算机辅助手术(DCAS)在颧种植体植入中的有效性。

材料与方法

对2000年至2024年发表的比较DCAS辅助颧种植体植入与传统方法的研究进行全面的数据库检索,提取数据并评估质量。

结果

纳入五项研究。DCAS显著提高了种植体植入的准确性,减少了并发症,并提高了患者满意度,与动态导航系统相比,机器人系统显示出更高的准确性和稳定性。

结论

DCAS为颧种植体植入提供了一种有前景的方法,提高了准确性、安全性和患者预后。需要进一步研究以探索其长期益处和局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0381/12244975/a0d50f58baca/JPBS-17-1229-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0381/12244975/a0d50f58baca/JPBS-17-1229-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0381/12244975/a0d50f58baca/JPBS-17-1229-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery for Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Systematic Review.用于颧骨种植体植入的动态计算机辅助手术:一项系统评价。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1229-S1232. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1640_24. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
Accuracy of freehand surgery, static and dynamic computer assisted surgery on zygomatic implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analyses.徒手手术、静态和动态计算机辅助手术在颧骨种植体植入中的准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2025 Apr;53(4):301-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2024.12.002. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
3
Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.动态计算机辅助种植体植入的准确性评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 May;25(5):2479-2494. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03833-8. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
4
Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies.机器人辅助种植牙植入与静态/动态计算机辅助种植手术的准确性比较:一项体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 20;60(1):11. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010011.
5
Accuracy in dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing computer-assisted (static, dynamic, robotics) and noncomputer-assisted (freehand, conventional guide) approaches.牙种植体植入的准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析,比较计算机辅助(静态、动态、机器人辅助)和非计算机辅助(徒手、传统导板)方法。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.038.
6
Minimal invasiveness at dental implant placement: A systematic review with meta-analyses on flapless fully guided surgery.微创牙种植体植入术:无瓣全引导手术的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Periodontol 2000. 2023 Feb;91(1):89-112. doi: 10.1111/prd.12440. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
7
Accuracy assessment of dynamic navigation during implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies in the last 10 years.种植体植入术中动态导航准确性评估的系统评价和Meta 分析:近 10 年的临床研究。
J Dent. 2023 Aug;135:104567. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104567. Epub 2023 May 30.
8
Accuracy and safety of dynamic navigation vs. freehand approach in indirect sinus lift and immediate implant placement: A split mouth clinical study.间接上颌窦提升和即刻种植术中动态导航与徒手操作方法的准确性和安全性:一项双侧对照临床研究。
J Dent. 2025 Sep;160:105866. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105866. Epub 2025 May 29.
9
Comparison of accuracy in freehand versus computer-assisted (dynamic and static) dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.徒手与计算机辅助(动态和静态)牙种植体植入准确性的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2025 Jan 1;25(1):22-29. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_369_24. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
10
Accuracy of Augmented Reality-Assisted Navigation in Dental Implant Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.增强现实辅助导航在牙种植术中的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 4;25:e42040. doi: 10.2196/42040.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants.计算机辅助静态和动态导航系统在颧骨牙科种植体植入中的准确性。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Mar 15;23(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02856-9.
2
Flapless placement of zygomatic implants using dynamic navigation: an innovative technical note.使用动态导航进行颧种植体的无瓣植入:一篇创新技术说明
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Feb;61(2):136-140. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.11.282. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
3
Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement.
颧骨种植体植入术中动态导航的可靠性和准确性。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Apr;33(4):362-376. doi: 10.1111/clr.13897. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
4
A novel application of dynamic guided navigation system in immediate implant placement.动态引导导航系统在即刻种植体植入中的新应用。
J Dent Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):354-360. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.09.030. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
5
Accuracy of digital planning in zygomatic implants.颧骨种植体数字化规划的准确性。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Jul 22;7(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00350-x.
6
Immediate implant-retained prosthetic obturation after maxillectomy based on zygomatic implant placement by 3D-guided surgery: a cadaver study.基于颧骨种植体的三维引导手术即刻种植义齿修复上颌骨切除术后缺损:一项尸体研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Jun 14;7(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00335-w.
7
Full arch rehabilitation in patients with atrophic upper jaws with zygomatic implants: a systematic review.上颌骨萎缩患者采用颧骨种植体进行全颌修复:系统评价。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Feb 26;7(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00297-z.
8
Comparative accuracy of cone-beam CT and conventional multislice computed tomography for real-time navigation in zygomatic implant surgery.锥形束 CT 与传统多层螺旋 CT 在颧骨种植术中实时导航的准确性比较。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Dec;22(6):747-755. doi: 10.1111/cid.12958. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
9
A novel extraoral registration method for a dynamic navigation system guiding zygomatic implant placement in patients with maxillectomy defects.一种用于引导上颌骨缺损患者颧骨种植体放置的动态导航系统的新型口外注册方法。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan;50(1):116-120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.03.018. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
10
Flapless Versus Traditional Dental Implant Surgery: Long-Term Evaluation of Crestal Bone Resorption.无瓣与传统牙种植手术:牙槽嵴骨吸收的长期评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;74(7):1354-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.01.053. Epub 2016 Feb 13.