• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对相似选项的吸引力:格式塔接近律与吸引效应有关。

Attraction to similar options: The Gestalt law of proximity is related to the attraction effect.

机构信息

Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Coller School of Management, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 28;15(10):e0240937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240937. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0240937
PMID:33112897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7592845/
Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that there are common mechanisms between perceptual and value-based processes. For instance, both perceptual and value-based choices are highly influenced by the context in which the choices are made. However, the mechanisms which allow context to influence our choice process as well as the extent of the similarity between the perceptual and preferential processes are still unclear. In this study, we examine a within-subject relation between the attraction effect, which is a well-known effect of context on preferential choice, and the Gestalt law of proximity. Then, we aim to use this link to better understand the mechanisms underlying the attraction effect. We conducted one study followed by an additional pre-registered replication study, where subjects performed a Gestalt-psychophysical task and a decoy task. Comparing the behavioral sensitivity of each subject in both tasks, we found that the more susceptible a subject is to the proximity law, the more she displayed the attraction effect. These results demonstrate a within-subject relation between a perceptual phenomenon (proximity law) and a value-based bias (attraction effect) which further strengthens the notion of common rules between perceptual and value-based processing. Moreover, this suggests that the mechanism underlying the attraction effect is related to grouping by proximity with attention as a mediator.

摘要

先前的研究表明,在知觉和基于价值的过程之间存在共同的机制。例如,基于知觉和基于价值的选择都受到选择所发生的环境的高度影响。然而,允许环境影响我们的选择过程的机制以及知觉和偏好过程之间的相似程度仍然不清楚。在这项研究中,我们在一个被试内的关系中检验了吸引效应,这是环境对偏好选择的一个众所周知的影响,以及格式塔接近律。然后,我们旨在利用这种联系来更好地理解吸引效应的机制。我们进行了一项研究,随后又进行了一项预先注册的复制研究,在这项研究中,被试执行了一项格式塔心理物理任务和一项诱饵任务。通过比较每个被试在两个任务中的行为敏感性,我们发现,一个被试越容易受到接近律的影响,她就越会表现出吸引效应。这些结果表明,一种知觉现象(接近律)和一种基于价值的偏见(吸引效应)之间存在一种被试内关系,这进一步强化了知觉和基于价值的加工之间存在共同规则的概念。此外,这表明吸引效应的机制与通过接近来分组有关,而注意力是其中介。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a342/7592845/7471be980649/pone.0240937.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a342/7592845/a987c7af0881/pone.0240937.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a342/7592845/3ecc48e9a476/pone.0240937.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a342/7592845/323b8f892374/pone.0240937.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a342/7592845/b1677cd04dcf/pone.0240937.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a342/7592845/ab7d1f2b58d0/pone.0240937.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a342/7592845/438937820650/pone.0240937.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a342/7592845/7471be980649/pone.0240937.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a342/7592845/a987c7af0881/pone.0240937.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a342/7592845/3ecc48e9a476/pone.0240937.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a342/7592845/323b8f892374/pone.0240937.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a342/7592845/b1677cd04dcf/pone.0240937.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a342/7592845/ab7d1f2b58d0/pone.0240937.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a342/7592845/438937820650/pone.0240937.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a342/7592845/7471be980649/pone.0240937.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Attraction to similar options: The Gestalt law of proximity is related to the attraction effect.对相似选项的吸引力:格式塔接近律与吸引效应有关。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 28;15(10):e0240937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240937. eCollection 2020.
2
Subliminal Gestalt grouping: evidence of perceptual grouping by proximity and similarity in absence of conscious perception.潜意识格式塔分组:无意识知觉条件下,通过邻近性和相似性进行知觉分组的证据。
Conscious Cogn. 2014 Apr;25:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
3
The Gestalt principle of similarity benefits visual working memory.格式塔相似性原则有利于视觉工作记忆。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Dec;20(6):1282-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0460-x.
4
Perceptual grouping in haptic search: the influence of proximity, similarity, and good continuation.触觉搜索中的知觉分组:邻近、相似性和良好连续性的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Aug;38(4):817-21. doi: 10.1037/a0029222. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
5
The Whole Warps the Sum of Its Parts.整体扭曲了其各部分的总和。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Jan;28(1):12-22. doi: 10.1177/0956797616671524. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
6
Gestalt similarity groupings are not constructed in parallel.格式塔相似性分组不是并行构建的。
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
7
Gestalt Effects in Visual Working Memory.视觉工作记忆中的格式塔效应。
Exp Psychol. 2017 Jan;64(1):5-13. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000346.
8
To what extent do Gestalt grouping principles influence tactile perception?格式塔组合原则在多大程度上影响触觉感知?
Psychol Bull. 2011 Jul;137(4):538-61. doi: 10.1037/a0022335.
9
Ecological statistics of Gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours.用于轮廓感知组织的格式塔法则的生态统计学
J Vis. 2002;2(4):324-53. doi: 10.1167/2.4.5.
10
Can two dots form a Gestalt? Measuring emergent features with the capacity coefficient.两个点能构成一个格式塔吗?用容量系数测量涌现特征。
Vision Res. 2016 Sep;126:19-33. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.04.019. Epub 2015 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Visual Coding Based on Attraction Effect on Human-Computer Interface.基于吸引效应的视觉编码对人机界面的影响。
J Eye Mov Res. 2025 Apr 8;18(2):12. doi: 10.3390/jemr18020012. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Value-based attention but not divisive normalization influences decisions with multiple alternatives.基于价值的注意力而非分歧归一化影响具有多个备选方案的决策。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jun;4(6):634-645. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0822-0. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
2
Cognitive and Neural Bases of Multi-Attribute, Multi-Alternative, Value-based Decisions.多属性、多选择、基于价值的决策的认知和神经基础。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Mar;23(3):251-263. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.12.003. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
3
Efficient coding of subjective value.主观价值的有效编码。
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Jan;22(1):134-142. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0292-0. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
4
Gain control explains the effect of distraction in human perceptual, cognitive, and economic decision making.增益控制解释了分心对人类感知、认知和经济决策的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 18;115(38):E8825-E8834. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805224115. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
5
Multialternative decision by sampling: A model of decision making constrained by process data.多元选择抽样:受过程数据约束的决策模型。
Psychol Rev. 2018 Jul;125(4):512-544. doi: 10.1037/rev0000102.
6
When the Good Looks Bad: An Experimental Exploration of the Repulsion Effect.当美貌变丑陋:排斥效应的实验探索。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Aug;29(8):1309-1320. doi: 10.1177/0956797618779041. Epub 2018 May 24.
7
Common Sense in Choice: The Effect of Sensory Modality on Neural Value Representations.常识在选择中的作用:感觉模态对神经价值表示的影响。
eNeuro. 2018 Apr 4;5(2). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0346-17.2018. eCollection 2018 Mar-Apr.
8
Normalized value coding explains dynamic adaptation in the human valuation process.归一化价值编码解释了人类估值过程中的动态适应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 28;114(48):12696-12701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715293114. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
9
Attraction Effect in Risky Choice Can Be Explained by Subjective Distance Between Choice Alternatives.风险选择中的吸引效应可以用选择备选方案之间的主观距离来解释。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 21;7(1):8942. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06968-5.
10
How motivation and reward learning modulate selective attention.动机和奖励学习如何调节选择性注意。
Prog Brain Res. 2016;229:325-342. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jul 12.