Hardy J F, Plourde G, Lebrun M, Côté C, Dubé S, Lepage Y
Department of Anaesthesia, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Quebec.
Can J Anaesth. 1987 Sep;34(5):474-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03014353.
Two methods used to measure the volume of gastric contents were evaluated in 24 supine anaesthetized adults. Methods compared were: (1) aspiration of stomach contents through a large, vented, multi-orificed gastric tube, and (2) indirect determination by a dye dilution method using polyethylene glycol (PEG) as the marker. The volumes determined by these methods (Vasp and Vpeg respectively) were compared to the total volume (Vtot) present in the stomach, determined by direct inspection of the gastric pouch by the surgeon at the beginning of surgery. The results show that the volume of aspirated gastric fluid, using this type of tube, is a very good estimate of the total volume of gastric residue. The PEG dilution method yields similar results. However, correlation between Vpeg and Vtot was not as close-fitting as the correlation between Vasp and Vtot. PEG dilution is more complicated, time-consuming and offers no advantage over aspiration.
在24名仰卧位麻醉的成年人中评估了两种测量胃内容物体积的方法。比较的方法有:(1)通过一根大的、有通气孔的多孔胃管抽吸胃内容物,以及(2)使用聚乙二醇(PEG)作为标记物通过染料稀释法进行间接测定。将通过这些方法测定的体积(分别为Vasp和Vpeg)与手术开始时外科医生直接检查胃囊确定的胃内总体积(Vtot)进行比较。结果表明,使用这种类型的管子抽吸的胃液体积是胃残余物总体积的一个非常好的估计值。PEG稀释法产生类似的结果。然而,Vpeg与Vtot之间的相关性不如Vasp与Vtot之间的相关性拟合紧密。PEG稀释更复杂、耗时,并且与抽吸相比没有优势。