Suppr超能文献

建筑工人表现出的危险识别模式。

Hazard Recognition Patterns Demonstrated by Construction Workers.

机构信息

Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, 2501 Stinson Dr., Raleigh, NC 27607, USA.

Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, The University of Alabama, 3023 HM Comer, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 24;17(21):7788. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217788.

Abstract

Construction workers fail to recognize a large number of safety hazards. These unrecognized safety hazards can lead to unintended hazard exposure and tragic safety incidents. Unfortunately, traditional hazard recognition interventions (e.g., job hazard analyses and safety training) have been unable to tackle the industry-wide problem of poor hazard recognition levels. In fact, emerging evidence has demonstrated that traditional hazard recognition interventions have been designed without a proper understanding of the challenges workers experience during hazard recognition efforts. Interventions and industry-wide efforts designed based on a more thorough understanding of these challenges can yield substantial benefits-including superior hazard recognition levels and lower injury rates. Towards achieving this goal, the current investigation focused on identifying hazard categories that workers are more proficient in recognizing and others that they are less proficient in recognizing (i.e., hazard recognition patterns). For the purpose of the current study, hazards were classified on the basis of the energy source per Haddon's energy release theory (e.g., gravity, motion, electrical, chemical, etc.). As part of the study, 287 workers representing 57 construction workplaces in the United States were engaged in a hazard recognition activity. Apart from confirming previous research findings that workers fail to recognize a disproportionate number of safety hazards, the results demonstrate that the workers are more proficient in recognizing certain hazard types. More specifically, the workers on average recognized roughly 47% of the safety hazards in the gravity, electrical, motion, and temperature hazard categories while only recognizing less than 10% of the hazards in the pressure, chemical, and radiation hazard categories. These findings can inform the development of more robust interventions and industry-wide initiatives to tackle the issue of poor hazard recognition levels in the construction industry.

摘要

建筑工人未能识别出大量的安全隐患。这些未被识别的安全隐患可能导致意外的危险暴露和悲惨的安全事故。不幸的是,传统的危险识别干预措施(例如,作业危害分析和安全培训)未能解决整个行业危险识别水平低的问题。事实上,新兴证据表明,传统的危险识别干预措施在设计时没有充分考虑工人在危险识别过程中所面临的挑战。基于对这些挑战的更深入理解而设计的干预措施和全行业的努力可以带来实质性的好处,包括更高的危险识别水平和更低的受伤率。为了实现这一目标,目前的调查重点是确定工人在识别某些危险类别方面更为熟练,而在识别其他危险类别方面则较为不熟练(即危险识别模式)。在当前的研究中,根据 Haddon 的能量释放理论(例如,重力、运动、电气、化学等)将危险进行分类。作为研究的一部分,来自美国 57 个建筑工地的 287 名工人参与了危险识别活动。除了证实工人未能识别出不成比例数量的安全隐患的先前研究结果外,研究结果还表明,工人在识别某些危险类型方面更为熟练。更具体地说,工人平均识别出重力、电气、运动和温度危险类别中约 47%的安全隐患,而仅识别出压力、化学和辐射危险类别中不到 10%的危险。这些发现可以为制定更有力的干预措施和全行业倡议提供信息,以解决建筑行业危险识别水平低的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ee/7663096/c8d6aeef5c0b/ijerph-17-07788-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验