Suppr超能文献

伴有掌侧月骨面小片骨折的桡骨远端骨折的临床转归:背侧和掌侧移位骨折的比较。

Clinical Outcomes in Distal Radius Fractures Accompanied by Volar Lunate Facet Fragments: A Comparison between Dorsal and Volar Displaced Fractures.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2020 Dec;25(4):417-422. doi: 10.1142/S2424835520500447.

Abstract

The treatment strategy for distal radius fractures accompanied by volar lunate facet fragment is controversial. In most cases, only the bone fragment size was discussed and a plate for distal placement is selected due to the accompanying volar lunate facet fragment regardless of the direction of bone fragment displacement. In this study, we divided distal radius fractures accompanied by volar lunate facet fragment into dorsal and volar displaced fractures, and treated these surgically based on different treatment strategies. The subjects were 25 patients with distal radius fractures accompanied by volar lunate facet fragment treated by reduction and fixation using a volar locking plate (VLP) (male: 14, female: 11, mean age: 57.8 years old). A proximal VLP (PVLP) was selected for 13 dorsal displaced fractures and a distal VLP (DVLP) was selected for 12 volar displaced fractures. The range of motion, VAS, Q-DASH, and Mayo score were evaluated at 12 months after surgery, and compared. No significant difference due to the difference in the direction of displacement was noted in the range of motion, VAS, Q-DASH, or Mayo score at 12 months after surgery and there were no perioperative complications. In addition, no re-displacement of volar lunate facet fragment was noted after surgery in any patient and bone fusion was observed. Reduction and fixation with a PVLP are possible even for dorsal displaced distal radius fractures accompanied by volar lunate facet fragment. For the volar displaced distal radius fractures, a favorable postoperative outcome is possible by applying a DVLP to the distal ulnar.

摘要

伴有月骨掌侧关节面骨块的桡骨远端骨折的治疗策略存在争议。在大多数情况下,仅讨论骨块大小,并根据伴随的月骨掌侧关节面骨块选择远端放置的钢板,而不管骨块移位的方向如何。在本研究中,我们将伴有月骨掌侧关节面骨块的桡骨远端骨折分为背侧和掌侧移位骨折,并根据不同的治疗策略进行手术治疗。

研究对象为 25 例采用掌侧锁定钢板(VLP)复位固定治疗的伴有月骨掌侧关节面骨块的桡骨远端骨折患者(男性 14 例,女性 11 例,平均年龄 57.8 岁)。13 例背侧移位骨折选择近端 VLP(PVLP),12 例掌侧移位骨折选择远端 VLP(DVLP)。术后 12 个月评估腕关节活动度、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand(Q-DASH)评分和 Mayo 腕关节评分,并进行比较。

术后 12 个月,腕关节活动度、VAS、Q-DASH 和 Mayo 评分因移位方向的不同无显著差异,且无围手术期并发症。此外,术后所有患者均未出现月骨掌侧关节面骨块再移位,均可见骨融合。

即使是伴有月骨掌侧关节面骨块的背侧移位的桡骨远端骨折,也可以采用 PVLP 进行复位固定。对于掌侧移位的桡骨远端骨折,采用 DVLP 固定于尺骨远端可获得良好的术后效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验