Kacetl Jaroslav, Marešová Petra, Maskuriy Raihan, Selamat Ali
Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Department of Economics, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Oct 13;13:2125-2148. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S260641. eCollection 2020.
Rare or orphan diseases have become an important target of healthcare activities all over the world. The study aims to identify ethical questions linked to rare diseases and orphan drugs and ethical principles or approaches applied to solve them.
Relevant peer-reviewed articles were identified by means of a systematic review. The literature was searched from 20 May 2020 to 20 June 2020. The search included the databases PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science (2010 - April 2020). A total of 4,139 papers related to rare diseases were identified; with 1,205 papers obtained from Scopus; 2,476 papers from PubMed; and 458 from Web of Science with keyword search "ethics" AND "rare" AND "disease", "ethical" AND "orphan", "ethical" AND "orphan" AND "drug", and "ethical" AND "rare" AND "disease". Finally, XX studies were chosen for further analysis.
The main findings reveal five main ethical issues. The most essential one shows that funding research and development in the field of orphan drugs poses an almost impossible dilemma. Other issues include the significance of non-economic values like compassion and beneficence in decision-making related to orphan drugs and rare diseases; the identification of limits to labelling diseases as rare; barriers to global, supranational and international cooperation; and last but not least, determining and establishing panels of decision-makers.
A strictly global approach would be the most appropriate way to deal with rare diseases. Nonetheless, international, let alone global, cooperation seems to be completely beyond the reach of the current international community, although the EU, for instance, has a centralized procedure for labelling orphan drugs. This deficit in international cooperation can be partly explained by the fact that the current technologically globalized world still lacks globally accepted ethical values and rules. This is further aggravated by unresolved international and intercultural conflicts. In addition, the sub-interests of various parties as well as the lack of desire to deal with other people's problems need to be taken into account. The aforementioned problems are difficult to avoid. Nevertheless, let us be cautiously optimistic. At least, there are people who raise ethical questions about rare diseases and orphan drugs.
罕见病或孤儿病已成为全球医疗活动的一个重要目标。本研究旨在确定与罕见病和孤儿药相关的伦理问题,以及用于解决这些问题的伦理原则或方法。
通过系统综述确定相关的同行评议文章。文献检索时间为2020年5月20日至2020年6月20日。检索包括数据库PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science(2010年 - 2020年4月)。共识别出4139篇与罕见病相关的论文;其中1205篇来自Scopus;2476篇来自PubMed;458篇来自Web of Science,关键词搜索为“伦理”与“罕见”与“疾病”、“伦理”与“孤儿”、“伦理”与“孤儿”与“药物”以及“伦理”与“罕见”与“疾病”。最后,选择了XX项研究进行进一步分析。
主要研究结果揭示了五个主要伦理问题。最关键的一个问题表明,为孤儿药领域的研发提供资金几乎构成了一个无法解决的困境。其他问题包括在与孤儿药和罕见病相关的决策中,同情和慈善等非经济价值的重要性;确定将疾病标记为罕见病的界限;全球、超国家和国际合作的障碍;以及最后但同样重要的是,确定和建立决策者小组。
采取严格的全球方法将是应对罕见病的最合适方式。尽管如此,国际合作,更不用说全球合作了,似乎完全超出了当前国际社会的能力范围,尽管例如欧盟有一个孤儿药标记的集中程序。国际合作的这种不足部分可以解释为,当前技术全球化的世界仍然缺乏全球公认的伦理价值观和规则。未解决的国际和跨文化冲突进一步加剧了这一情况。此外,还需要考虑各方的次要利益以及处理他人问题的意愿缺失。上述问题难以避免。然而,让我们保持谨慎的乐观。至少,有人提出了关于罕见病和孤儿药的伦理问题。