• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罕见病的基因检测:伦理方面的系统评价

Genetic Testing for Rare Diseases: A Systematic Review of Ethical Aspects.

作者信息

Kruse Judith, Mueller Regina, Aghdassi Ali A, Lerch Markus M, Salloch Sabine

机构信息

Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Front Genet. 2022 Jan 26;12:701988. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.701988. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fgene.2021.701988
PMID:35154238
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8826556/
Abstract

Genetic testing is associated with many ethical challenges on the individual, organizational and macro level of health care systems. The provision of genetic testing for rare diseases in particular requires a full understanding of the complexity and multiplicity of related ethical aspects. This systematic review presents a detailed overview of ethical aspects relevant to genetic testing for rare diseases as discussed in the literature. The electronic databases Pubmed, Science Direct and Web of Science were searched, resulting in 55 relevant publications. From the latter, a total of 93 different ethical aspects were identified. These ethical aspects were structured into three main categories (process of testing, consequences of the test outcome and contextual challenges) and 20 subcategories highlighting the diversity and complexity of ethical aspects relevant to genetic testing for rare diseases. This review can serve as a starting point for the further in-depth investigation of particular ethical issues, the education of healthcare professionals regarding this matter and for informing international policy development on genetic testing for rare diseases.

摘要

基因检测在医疗保健系统的个人、组织和宏观层面都面临着诸多伦理挑战。尤其是为罕见病提供基因检测,需要充分理解相关伦理问题的复杂性和多样性。本系统综述详细概述了文献中讨论的与罕见病基因检测相关的伦理问题。检索了电子数据库PubMed、Science Direct和Web of Science,共获得55篇相关出版物。从中总共识别出93个不同的伦理问题。这些伦理问题被归纳为三个主要类别(检测过程、检测结果的后果以及背景挑战)和20个子类别,突出了与罕见病基因检测相关的伦理问题的多样性和复杂性。本综述可作为进一步深入研究特定伦理问题、对医疗保健专业人员进行这方面教育以及为罕见病基因检测的国际政策制定提供参考的起点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aa3/8826556/11a1f73b4dbc/fgene-12-701988-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aa3/8826556/21d1eaece631/fgene-12-701988-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aa3/8826556/7c9c458fe83b/fgene-12-701988-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aa3/8826556/12c46e3bc334/fgene-12-701988-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aa3/8826556/11a1f73b4dbc/fgene-12-701988-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aa3/8826556/21d1eaece631/fgene-12-701988-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aa3/8826556/7c9c458fe83b/fgene-12-701988-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aa3/8826556/12c46e3bc334/fgene-12-701988-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aa3/8826556/11a1f73b4dbc/fgene-12-701988-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Genetic Testing for Rare Diseases: A Systematic Review of Ethical Aspects.罕见病的基因检测:伦理方面的系统评价
Front Genet. 2022 Jan 26;12:701988. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.701988. eCollection 2021.
2
Ethical Questions Linked to Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs - A Systematic Review.与罕见病和孤儿药相关的伦理问题——一项系统综述
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Oct 13;13:2125-2148. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S260641. eCollection 2020.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
The full spectrum of ethical issues in pediatric genome-wide sequencing: a systematic qualitative review.儿科全基因组测序中的伦理问题全景:系统定性综述。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02830-w.
5
Clinical Ethics in Gabon: The Spectrum of Clinical Ethical Issues Based on Findings from In-Depth Interviews at Three Public Hospitals.加蓬的临床伦理学:基于三家公立医院深入访谈结果的临床伦理问题范围
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 10;10(7):e0132374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132374. eCollection 2015.
6
Ethics of oocyte banking for third-party assisted reproduction: a systematic review.卵子库用于第三方辅助生殖的伦理问题:系统综述。
Hum Reprod Update. 2018 Sep 1;24(5):615-635. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmy016.
7
What Do Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiology Say About an Ethics Review? A Qualitative Systematic Review.流行病学伦理准则对伦理审查有何规定?一项定性系统评价。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Jun;23(3):743-768. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9829-3. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
8
The full spectrum of ethical issues in dementia care: systematic qualitative review.痴呆症护理中的伦理问题全景:系统定性评价。
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;202:400-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.116335.
9
Ethics and equity in rare disease research and healthcare.罕见病研究与医疗中的伦理与公平
Per Med. 2021 Jul;18(4):407-416. doi: 10.2217/pme-2020-0144. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
10
Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals.非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)的范围限制:对产前筛查国际伦理框架的分析及对荷兰专业人士的访谈研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Oct 19;18(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2050-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-assessed knowledge of genomic medicine among non-genetics physicians - results from a nationwide Swedish survey.非遗传学医生对基因组医学的自我评估知识——瑞典全国性调查结果
J Community Genet. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00818-y.
2
Clinical implementation of a multidisciplinary pipeline for genome sequencing in rare diseases: A prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study.罕见病基因组测序多学科流程的临床应用:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性队列研究。
Clin Transl Med. 2025 Jul;15(7):e70401. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.70401.
3
Nursing's Role in Advancing Care for Rare Genetic Diseases.

本文引用的文献

1
Reproductive options for families at risk of Osteogenesis Imperfecta: a review.成骨不全症风险家庭的生殖选择:综述。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020 May 27;15(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01404-w.
2
Clinical application of genomic high-throughput data: Infrastructural, ethical, legal and psychosocial aspects.基因组高通量数据的临床应用:基础设施、伦理、法律和心理社会方面。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 Feb;31:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.09.008. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
3
How to tackle the conundrum of quality appraisal in systematic reviews of normative literature/information? Analysing the problems of three possible strategies (translation of a German paper).
护理在推进罕见遗传病护理中的作用。
Nurs Clin North Am. 2025 Jun;60(2):349-368. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2024.12.005. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
4
The impact of rare diseases on the quality of life in paediatric patients: current status.罕见病对儿科患者生活质量的影响:现状
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 24;13:1531583. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1531583. eCollection 2025.
5
Towards a standard benchmark for phenotype-driven variant and gene prioritisation algorithms: PhEval - Phenotypic inference Evaluation framework.迈向用于表型驱动的变异体和基因优先级排序算法的标准基准:PhEval - 表型推断评估框架。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2025 Mar 22;26(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12859-025-06105-4.
6
The Importance of Genetic Diagnosis in Rare Diseases.基因诊断在罕见病中的重要性。
Balkan Med J. 2025 Mar 3;42(2):92-93. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2025.2025-270125.
7
Policy Challenges in Ultra-Rare Cancers: Ethical, Social, and Legal Implications of Melanoma Prevention and Diagnosis in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults.超罕见癌症的政策挑战:儿童、青少年和青年黑色素瘤预防与诊断的伦理、社会和法律影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 4;13(3):321. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030321.
8
Towards a standard benchmark for phenotype-driven variant and gene prioritisation algorithms: PhEval - Phenotypic inference Evaluation framework.迈向用于表型驱动的变异和基因优先级排序算法的标准基准:PhEval - 表型推断评估框架。
bioRxiv. 2025 Feb 20:2024.06.13.598672. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.13.598672.
9
The economic impact of living with a rare disease for children and their families: a scoping review protocol.罕见疾病对儿童及其家庭生活的经济影响:一项范围综述方案。
HRB Open Res. 2024 Apr 8;6:41. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13765.2. eCollection 2023.
10
Stigma associated with genetic testing for rare diseases-causes and recommendations.与罕见病基因检测相关的污名化——原因与建议。
Front Genet. 2024 Apr 4;15:1335768. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1335768. eCollection 2024.
如何解决规范性文献/信息系统评价中的质量评估难题?分析三种可能策略(一篇德文论文的翻译)的问题。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Nov 14;20(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0423-5.
4
Toward Clinical Implementation of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Genetic Testing in Rare Diseases: Where Are We?迈向罕见病下一代测序基因检测的临床应用:我们在哪里?
Trends Genet. 2019 Nov;35(11):852-867. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
5
Secondary findings from next generation sequencing: Psychological and ethical issues. Family and patient perspectives.下一代测序的次要发现:心理和伦理问题。家庭与患者视角。
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 Oct;62(10):103711. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.103711. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
6
The value of diagnostic testing for parents of children with rare genetic diseases.对患有罕见遗传病儿童的父母进行诊断检测的价值。
Genet Med. 2019 Dec;21(12):2798-2806. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0583-1. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
7
Genome-wide sequencing technologies: A primer for paediatricians.全基因组测序技术:儿科医生入门指南。
Paediatr Child Health. 2018 May;23(3):191-197. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxx152. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
8
Paediatric genomics: diagnosing rare disease in children.儿科基因组学:诊断儿童罕见病。
Nat Rev Genet. 2018 May;19(5):253-268. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.116. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
9
Evaluating the survivor or the relatives of those who do not survive: the role of genetic testing.评估幸存者或非幸存者的亲属:基因检测的作用。
Cardiol Young. 2017 Jan;27(S1):S19-S24. doi: 10.1017/S1047951116002183.
10
Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) for single gene disorders: cost analysis of NIPD and invasive testing pathways.单基因疾病的非侵入性产前诊断(NIPD):NIPD与侵入性检测途径的成本分析
Prenat Diagn. 2016 Jul;36(7):636-42. doi: 10.1002/pd.4832. Epub 2016 May 22.