• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对罕见病的认知及对日本医疗资源配置的意见:一项横断面研究。

General public's understanding of rare diseases and their opinions on medical resource allocation in Japan: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Division of Bioethics and Healthcare Law, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.

Department of Public Policy, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Jun 8;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02762-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13023-023-02762-x
PMID:37291571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10249302/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rare diseases (RDs) may impose a considerable financial burden on patients and their families. Public acceptance is essential to ensure sustainable public systems supporting RDs, especially in countries with universal healthcare coverage, such as Japan. This study aimed to explore the public's understanding of RDs and identify crucial factors associated with the public acceptance of prioritizing financial support for RDs in Japan.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was sent to 131,220 Japanese residents aged 20-69 years. The items included in the questionnaire were general interest in medical science and medical care, general knowledge regarding RDs and health care systems, opinions on the cost of medical care, opinions on the research and development of RDs and common diseases, and individual characteristics.

RESULTS

The responses of 11,019 respondents were analyzed. Several respondents agreed to partially cover the medication cost of adult and pediatric RDs (59.5% and 66.8%, respectively) with public funding. The major reasons for agreeing were the huge financial burden imposed on patients and their families, limited available treatment options, effects of RDs on the life planning of patients, and difficulties caused by RDs in the patient's social life. Furthermore, the respondents ranked RDs (56.0%) higher than common diseases (44.0%) for government funding for research and development. The reasons for supporting government-funded research and development for RDs included the lack of treatment options for numerous RDs (34.9%) and difficulty of studying RDs owing to the small number of researchers (25.9%). The chief reasons for supporting government-funded research and development for common diseases were the large number of affected patients (59.7%) and the possibility of more treatment options becoming available through the promotion of research and development (22.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The general public considers burdens associated with daily living or finance more than the epidemiological characteristics of RD while making funding decisions, demonstrating that rarity was less prioritized. A gap appears to exist between the general public and RD experts regarding the understanding of the epidemiological characteristics of RD and its thresholds. This gap should be bridged to ensure that prioritization of financial support for RDs is accepted by the society.

摘要

背景

罕见病(RDs)可能给患者及其家庭带来相当大的经济负担。公众的接受度对于确保支持 RD 的可持续公共系统至关重要,尤其是在像日本这样拥有全民医疗覆盖的国家。本研究旨在探讨公众对 RD 的理解,并确定与公众对优先为 RD 提供财务支持的接受度相关的关键因素。

方法

向 131220 名年龄在 20-69 岁的日本居民发送了一份在线问卷。问卷中的项目包括对医学科学和医疗保健的一般兴趣、对 RD 和医疗保健系统的一般了解、对医疗保健费用的看法、对 RD 和常见疾病的研发的看法以及个人特征。

结果

分析了 11019 名受访者的回答。一些受访者同意用公共资金部分覆盖成人和儿科 RD 的药物费用(分别为 59.5%和 66.8%)。同意的主要原因是 RD 给患者及其家庭带来了巨大的经济负担、治疗选择有限、RD 对患者生活规划的影响以及 RD 给患者社会生活带来的困难。此外,受访者将 RD(56.0%)排在政府研发资金的首位,而常见疾病(44.0%)排在第二位。支持政府为 RD 提供研发资金的原因包括许多 RD 缺乏治疗选择(34.9%)和由于研究人员数量少而难以研究 RD(25.9%)。支持政府为常见疾病提供研发资金的主要原因是受影响患者人数众多(59.7%)以及通过促进研发可能获得更多的治疗选择(22.1%)。

结论

在做出资金决策时,公众更关注与日常生活或财务相关的负担,而不是 RD 的流行病学特征,这表明稀有性的优先级较低。公众和 RD 专家在对 RD 的流行病学特征及其阈值的理解上似乎存在差距。应该弥合这一差距,以确保社会接受为 RD 提供财务支持的优先级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9005/10249302/73f89927e20c/13023_2023_2762_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9005/10249302/acabc2e22f88/13023_2023_2762_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9005/10249302/cc823c0bd22d/13023_2023_2762_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9005/10249302/25c84bca91b5/13023_2023_2762_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9005/10249302/377839ee9bcb/13023_2023_2762_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9005/10249302/73f89927e20c/13023_2023_2762_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9005/10249302/acabc2e22f88/13023_2023_2762_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9005/10249302/cc823c0bd22d/13023_2023_2762_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9005/10249302/25c84bca91b5/13023_2023_2762_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9005/10249302/377839ee9bcb/13023_2023_2762_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9005/10249302/73f89927e20c/13023_2023_2762_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
General public's understanding of rare diseases and their opinions on medical resource allocation in Japan: a cross-sectional study.公众对罕见病的认知及对日本医疗资源配置的意见:一项横断面研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Jun 8;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02762-x.
2
Engaging the Canadian public on reimbursement decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: a national online survey.让加拿大公众参与罕见病药物报销决策:一项全国性在线调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 26;17(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2310-4.
3
Prioritization of research engaged with rare disease stakeholders: a systematic review and thematic analysis.优先考虑与罕见病利益相关者合作的研究:系统评价和主题分析。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Nov 23;18(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02892-2.
4
Toward the development of a vibrant, super-aged society: The future of medicine and society in Japan.迈向充满活力的超老龄社会:日本的医学与社会的未来。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Aug;21(8):601-613. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14201. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
5
Health-related quality of life among adults with diverse rare disorders.成年人多种罕见病相关的生活质量。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Dec 7;12(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0730-1.
6
Are rare diseases overlooked by medical education? Awareness of rare diseases among physicians in Poland: an explanatory study.罕见病是否被医学教育所忽视?波兰医生对罕见病的认知:一项解释性研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Sep 28;16(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-02023-9.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Rare disease emerging as a global public health priority.罕见病成为全球公共卫生重点关注对象。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 18;10:1028545. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1028545. eCollection 2022.
9
The Awareness of Rare Diseases Among Medical Students and Practicing Physicians in the Republic of Kazakhstan. An Exploratory Study.哈萨克斯坦共和国医学生和执业医师对罕见病的认知。一项探索性研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 8;10:872648. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.872648. eCollection 2022.
10
Treating rare diseases with the cinema: Can popular movies enhance public understanding of rare diseases?用电影治疗罕见病:大众电影能否增强公众对罕见病的认识?
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Mar 5;17(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02269-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Reforming China's Rare Disease Security System: Risk Management Perspectives and a Dedicated Insurance Innovation.改革中国罕见病保障体系:风险管理视角与专项保险创新
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 31;13(17):2178. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13172178.
2
Actual needs of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a qualitative study from Wuhan, China.肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者的实际需求:来自中国武汉的一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Feb 22;24(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01684-8.
3
Qualitative Study on the Real Experiences of Patients with Meige Syndrome Based on the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory.

本文引用的文献

1
Should rare diseases get special treatment?罕见病是否应该得到特殊待遇?
J Med Ethics. 2022 Feb;48(2):86-92. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107691. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
2
Individualized Therapeutics Development for Rare Diseases: The Current Ethical Landscape and Policy Responses.罕见病的个体化治疗研发:当前的伦理现状与政策应对措施
Nucleic Acid Ther. 2022 Apr;32(2):111-117. doi: 10.1089/nat.2021.0035. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
3
A survey of Australian public attitudes towards funding of high cost cancer medicines.澳大利亚公众对高价癌症治疗药物资助态度的调查。
基于个体与家庭自我管理理论的梅杰综合征患者真实体验质性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Dec 27;18:2681-2696. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S484296. eCollection 2024.
Health Policy. 2021 Mar;125(3):327-334. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.12.002. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
4
Evaluating New Zealanders' Values for Drug Coverage Decision Making: Trade-Offs between Treatments for Rare and Common Conditions.评估新西兰人为药物覆盖范围决策的价值观:在罕见和常见疾病治疗之间的权衡。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Jan;39(1):109-119. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00974-8. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
5
Ethical Questions Linked to Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs - A Systematic Review.与罕见病和孤儿药相关的伦理问题——一项系统综述
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Oct 13;13:2125-2148. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S260641. eCollection 2020.
6
Social Preferences for Orphan Drugs: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among the French General Population.对孤儿药的社会偏好:法国普通人群中的离散选择实验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Jul 17;7:323. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00323. eCollection 2020.
7
Patient-Customized Oligonucleotide Therapy for a Rare Genetic Disease.患者定制型寡核苷酸疗法治疗罕见遗传病。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 24;381(17):1644-1652. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1813279. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
8
Ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) in rare diseases: a landscape analysis from funders.罕见病的伦理、法律和社会问题(ELSI):来自资助者的全景分析。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Feb;28(2):174-181. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0513-3. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
9
Evaluating Canadians' Values for Drug Coverage Decision Making.评估加拿大人对药物覆盖决策的价值观。
Value Health. 2019 Mar;22(3):362-369. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
10
Societal Preferences for Funding Orphan Drugs in the United Kingdom: An Application of Person Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods.英国社会对孤儿药资助的偏好:一种应用于个人权衡和离散选择实验方法的研究。
Value Health. 2018 May;21(5):538-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.026.