Department of Cardiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Cardiology, Center Hospital of Putuo District, Shanghai, China.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Dec;43(12):1564-1571. doi: 10.1111/pace.14110. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
Data on the incidence, clinical characteristics, and implications of acute conduction recurrence during mitral isthmus (MI) ablation are scarce.
MI ablation was performed in patients with atrial fibrillation. After confirming bidirectional conduction block, the acute conduction recurrence of MI was systematically evaluated. Clinical and electrophysiological characteristics were analyzed.
A total of 66 consecutive patients in whom bidirectional conduction block of MI was achieved were prospectively enrolled in a single center. Acute conduction recurrence of MI developed in 12 (18.2%) patients within 14.2 ± 11.5 minutes after the confirmation of bidirectional conduction block. There were two recurrent conduction breakthrough sites of MI along the course of the great cardiac vein (4.5 ± 3.5 min) in two patients and 11 along the course of the ligament of Marshall (LOM) (16.0 ± 11.6 min, P = .035) in 11 patients. LOM accounted for most (84.6%, 11/13) acute MI conduction recurrence. MI length, total ablation time, and procedure time for MI were greater in patients with acute conduction recurrence than in those without acute conduction recurrence. During follow-up, arrhythmia recurrences were less observed in patients with acute conduction when compared to patients without acute conduction recurrence (0% vs 26.4%, P = .055).
Acute conduction recurrence, predominantly due to recurrent LOM conduction, was a common phenomenon during MI ablation, and its evaluation should therefore be the focus to improve MI ablation efficacy and durability.
关于二尖瓣峡部(MI)消融过程中急性传导复发的发生率、临床特征和影响的数据很少。
对房颤患者进行 MI 消融。在确认双向传导阻滞后,系统评估 MI 的急性传导复发。分析临床和电生理特征。
在单中心前瞻性纳入了 66 例 MI 双向传导阻滞成功的连续患者。在确认双向传导阻滞后 14.2±11.5 分钟内,12 例(18.2%)患者出现 MI 急性传导复发。在 2 例患者中,共有 2 个 MI 复发性传导突破部位位于心大静脉走行处(4.5±3.5 分钟),在 11 例患者中,共有 11 个 MI 复发性传导突破部位位于Marshall 韧带(LOM)走行处(16.0±11.6 分钟,P=0.035)。LOM 占大部分(84.6%,11/13)急性 MI 传导复发。与无急性传导复发的患者相比,有急性传导复发的患者 MI 长度、总消融时间和 MI 手术时间更大。在随访期间,与无急性传导复发的患者相比,有急性传导复发的患者心律失常复发率较低(0% vs 26.4%,P=0.055)。
急性传导复发,主要是由于复发性 LOM 传导,是 MI 消融过程中的常见现象,因此评估其情况应成为提高 MI 消融效果和耐久性的重点。