Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Bloomberg Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Dec 1;6(12):1952-1956. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5012.
The spectrum of individual immune-related adverse events (irAEs) from anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been reported widely, and their development is associated with improved patient survival across tumor types. The spectrum and impact on survival for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop multisystem irAEs from ICIs, has not been described.
To characterize multisystem irAEs, their association with survival, and risk factors for multisystem irAE development.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study carried out in 5 academic institutions worldwide included 623 patients with stage III/IV NSCLC, treated with anti-PD-(L)1 ICIs alone or in combination with another anticancer agent between January 2007 and January 2019.
Anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy or combinations.
Multisystem irAEs were characterized by combinations of individual irAEs or organ system involved, separated by ICI-monotherapy or combinations. Median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in PFS and OS between irAE groups were assessed by multivariable models. Risk for multisystem irAE was estimated as odds ratios by multivariable logistic regression.
The 623 patients included in the study were mostly men (60%, n = 375) and White (77%, n = 480). The median (range) age was 66 (58-73) years, and 148 patients (24%) developed a single irAE, whereas 58 (9.3%) developed multisystem irAEs. The most common multisystem irAE patterns in patients receiving anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy were pneumonitis thyroiditis (n = 7, 14%), hepatitis thyroiditis (n = 5, 10%), dermatitis pneumonitis (n = 5, 10%), and dermatitis thyroiditis (n = 4, 8%). Favorable Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) (ECOG PS = 0/1 vs 2; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08-0.94; P = .04) and longer ICI duration (aOR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P < .001) were independent risk factors for development of multisystem irAEs. Patients with 1 irAE and multisystem irAEs demonstrated incrementally improved OS (adjusted hazard ratios [aHRs], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.66-1.12; P = .26; and aHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.85; P = . 005, respectively) and PFS (aHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85; P = .001; and aHR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.28-0.55; P < .001, respectively) vs patients with no irAEs, in multivariable models adjusting for ICI duration.
In this multicenter cohort study, development of multisystem irAEs was associated with improved survival in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs.
抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白 1(PD-1)和程序性细胞死亡配体 1(PD-L1)免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的个体免疫相关不良事件(irAE)谱已广泛报道,其发展与多种肿瘤类型患者的生存改善相关。然而,ICI 治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者发生多系统 irAE 的谱及其对生存的影响尚未描述。
描述多系统 irAE,及其与生存的关联,以及发生多系统 irAE 的风险因素。
设计、设置和参与者:这项在全球 5 个学术机构进行的回顾性队列研究纳入了 623 名接受抗 PD-(L)1 ICI 单药或联合其他抗癌药物治疗的 III/IV 期 NSCLC 患者,研究时间为 2007 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月。
抗 PD-(L)1 单药或联合治疗。
多系统 irAE 通过个体 irAE 或受累器官系统的组合来描述,这些组合通过 ICI 单药或联合治疗来区分。使用 Kaplan-Meier 法估计中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。通过多变量模型评估 irAE 组之间 PFS 和 OS 的差异。通过多变量逻辑回归估计多系统 irAE 的风险比(OR)。
这项研究纳入的 623 名患者主要为男性(60%,n=375)和白人(77%,n=480)。中位(范围)年龄为 66(58-73)岁,148 名(24%)患者发生单一 irAE,58 名(9.3%)患者发生多系统 irAE。接受抗 PD-(L)1 单药治疗的患者中最常见的多系统 irAE 模式为肺炎性甲状腺炎(n=7,14%)、肝炎性甲状腺炎(n=5,10%)、皮炎性肺炎(n=5,10%)和皮炎性甲状腺炎(n=4,8%)。Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG)表现状态(PS)较好(ECOG PS=0/1 比 2;调整后的 OR,0.27;95%CI,0.08-0.94;P=0.04)和 ICI 持续时间较长(调整后的 OR,1.02;95%CI,1.01-1.03;P<0.001)是发生多系统 irAE 的独立风险因素。发生 1 种 irAE 和多系统 irAE 的患者的 OS(调整后的 HR,0.86;95%CI,0.66-1.12;P=0.26;和调整后的 HR,0.57;95%CI,0.38-0.85;P=0.005)和 PFS(调整后的 HR,0.68;95%CI,0.55-0.85;P=0.001;和调整后的 HR,0.39;95%CI,0.28-0.55;P<0.001)均逐渐改善,与无 irAE 的患者相比,多变量模型调整了 ICI 持续时间。
在这项多中心队列研究中,ICI 治疗的晚期 NSCLC 患者发生多系统 irAE 与生存改善相关。