Julie R. Brahmer, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center; Jennifer S. Mammen, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Christina Lacchetti, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Alexander Spira, Virginia Cancer Specialists and US Oncology Research, Fairfax, VA; Bryan J. Schneider, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center; Cristina A. Reichner, Georgetown University; Laura D. Porter, Colon Cancer Alliance; Washington, DC; Kelly J. Brassil, Aung Naing, Loretta J. Nastoupil, Maria E. Suarez-Almazor, and Yinghong Wang, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Jeffrey M. Caterino, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Ian Chau, The Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London and Surrey, United Kingdom; Marc S. Ernstoff and Igor Puzanov, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Bianca D. Santomasso and Jedd D. Wolchok, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Jeffrey S. Weber, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Pamela Ginex, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh, PA; Jennifer M. Gardner, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sigrun Hallmeyer, Oncology Specialists SC, Park Ridge, IL; Jennifer Holter Chakrabarty, University of Oklahoma, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Natasha B. Leighl, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Carole Seigel, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; John A. Thompson, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Tanyanika Phillips, CHRISTUS St Frances Cabrini Cancer Center, Alexandria, LA.
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 10;36(17):1714-1768. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
Purpose To increase awareness, outline strategies, and offer guidance on the recommended management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) therapy. Methods A multidisciplinary, multi-organizational panel of experts in medical oncology, dermatology, gastroenterology, rheumatology, pulmonology, endocrinology, urology, neurology, hematology, emergency medicine, nursing, trialist, and advocacy was convened to develop the clinical practice guideline. Guideline development involved a systematic review of the literature and an informal consensus process. The systematic review focused on guidelines, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and case series published from 2000 through 2017. Results The systematic review identified 204 eligible publications. Much of the evidence consisted of systematic reviews of observational data, consensus guidelines, case series, and case reports. Due to the paucity of high-quality evidence on management of immune-related adverse events, recommendations are based on expert consensus. Recommendations Recommendations for specific organ system-based toxicity diagnosis and management are presented. While management varies according to organ system affected, in general, ICPi therapy should be continued with close monitoring for grade 1 toxicities, with the exception of some neurologic, hematologic, and cardiac toxicities. ICPi therapy may be suspended for most grade 2 toxicities, with consideration of resuming when symptoms revert to grade 1 or less. Corticosteroids may be administered. Grade 3 toxicities generally warrant suspension of ICPis and the initiation of high-dose corticosteroids (prednisone 1 to 2 mg/kg/d or methylprednisolone 1 to 2 mg/kg/d). Corticosteroids should be tapered over the course of at least 4 to 6 weeks. Some refractory cases may require infliximab or other immunosuppressive therapy. In general, permanent discontinuation of ICPis is recommended with grade 4 toxicities, with the exception of endocrinopathies that have been controlled by hormone replacement. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .
提高对接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICPi)治疗的患者发生免疫相关不良反应(irAE)的管理的认识,概述策略,并提供指导。
医学肿瘤学、皮肤病学、胃肠病学、风湿病学、肺病学、内分泌学、泌尿科、神经病学、血液学、急诊医学、护理、临床试验和倡导等多学科、多组织的专家组成的小组,共同制定了本临床实践指南。指南制定涉及对文献的系统回顾和非正式共识过程。系统回顾侧重于 2000 年至 2017 年发表的指南、系统评价和荟萃分析、随机对照试验和病例系列。
系统回顾确定了 204 篇合格出版物。大部分证据来自观察性数据的系统评价、共识指南、病例系列和病例报告。由于缺乏免疫相关不良反应管理的高质量证据,因此建议主要基于专家共识。
提出了基于特定器官系统毒性诊断和管理的建议。虽然根据受影响的器官系统而有所不同,但一般来说,对于 1 级毒性,应继续使用 ICPi 治疗并密切监测,除非存在某些神经、血液和心脏毒性。对于大多数 2 级毒性,可暂停使用 ICPi,并考虑在症状恢复至 1 级或更低时恢复使用。可能需要给予皮质类固醇。3 级毒性通常需要暂停 ICPi 并开始使用大剂量皮质类固醇(泼尼松 1 至 2mg/kg/d 或甲泼尼龙 1 至 2mg/kg/d)。皮质类固醇应在至少 4 至 6 周内逐渐减少。一些难治性病例可能需要使用英夫利昔单抗或其他免疫抑制治疗。一般来说,对于 4 级毒性,建议永久停止使用 ICPi,但已通过激素替代治疗控制的内分泌疾病除外。更多信息可在 www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines 和 www.asco.org/guidelineswiki 上获得。