• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BioRoot RCS 与 AH Plus 可取出性的微计算机断层扫描评估。

A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of retreatability of BioRoot RCS in comparison with AH Plus.

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Endodontic Residency Program, Saudi Commission for Health Specialist, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Aust Endod J. 2021 Aug;47(2):222-227. doi: 10.1111/aej.12456. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1111/aej.12456
PMID:33119208
Abstract

This study compared the retreatability of filling material from canals filled with BioRoot RCS (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fosses, France) and AH Plus (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) combined with gutta-percha using micro-computed tomography for evaluation. Thirty-four mandibular premolars were divided into two groups according to the sealer used. Thirty days after obturation, canals were retreated with a ProTaper Universal retreatment system (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) followed by passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI). The time taken for retreatment was recorded. The roots were scanned after obturation, after retreatment and after PUI. Data were analysed using the Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests. Canals filled with BioRoot RCS exhibited significantly less remaining filling material than canals filled with AH Plus (P < 0.05). The addition of PUI resulted in a significant decrease in the residual material in both groups (P < 0.05). A significantly shorter retreatment time was reported for the AH Plus group than the BioRoot RCS group (P < 0.05).

摘要

本研究比较了使用 Micro-CT 评估的 BioRoot RCS(Septodont,Saint-Maur-des-Fosses,法国)和 AH Plus(Dentsply DeTrey,Konstanz,德国)与牙胶联合填充的根管再治疗能力。34 颗下颌前磨牙根据使用的密封剂分为两组。在封闭后 30 天,使用 ProTaper Universal 再治疗系统(Dentsply Maillefer,Ballaigues,瑞士)进行根管再治疗,随后进行被动超声冲洗(PUI)。记录再治疗所需的时间。封闭后、再治疗后和 PUI 后对牙根进行扫描。使用 Mann-Whitney 和 Wilcoxon 检验分析数据。与 AH Plus 组相比,BioRoot RCS 组的根管内剩余填充物明显减少(P < 0.05)。在两组中,添加 PUI 都会导致残留材料明显减少(P < 0.05)。与 BioRoot RCS 组相比,AH Plus 组的再治疗时间明显更短(P < 0.05)。

相似文献

1
A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of retreatability of BioRoot RCS in comparison with AH Plus.BioRoot RCS 与 AH Plus 可取出性的微计算机断层扫描评估。
Aust Endod J. 2021 Aug;47(2):222-227. doi: 10.1111/aej.12456. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
2
Retreatability of two hydraulic calcium silicate-based root canal sealers using rotary instrumentation with supplementary irrigant agitation protocols: a laboratory-based micro-computed tomographic analysis.使用旋转器械和补充冲洗液搅拌方案对两种水液压硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的可取出性进行评估:基于实验室的微计算机断层扫描分析。
Int Endod J. 2019 Sep;52(9):1377-1387. doi: 10.1111/iej.13132. Epub 2019 May 17.
3
The Retrievability of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer during Retreatment and the Effectiveness of Additional Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation: A Microcomputed Tomographic Study.基于硅酸钙的封闭剂在再治疗期间的可取出性和额外被动超声冲洗的有效性:一项微计算机断层扫描研究。
Scanning. 2022 Jan 24;2022:3933305. doi: 10.1155/2022/3933305. eCollection 2022.
4
Retreatability of 2 mineral trioxide aggregate-based root canal sealers: a cone-beam computed tomography analysis.基于 2 种三氧化矿物凝聚体的根管封闭剂的可退缩性:锥形束 CT 分析。
J Endod. 2013 Jul;39(7):893-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.022. Epub 2013 May 14.
5
Retreatment of Root Canals Filled with BioRoot RCS: An In Vitro Experimental Study.用 BioRoot RCS 重填根管的再治疗:一项体外实验研究。
J Endod. 2020 Jun;46(6):858-862. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.03.018. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
6
Comparative evaluation of retreatability of calcium silicate-based root canal sealers and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers in curved canals-An micro-CT analysis.基于钙硅酸钠的根管封闭剂和基于环氧树脂的根管封闭剂在弯曲根管中可退缩性的比较评价——micro-CT 分析。
Indian J Dent Res. 2021 Jan-Feb;32(1):79-86. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_328_20.
7
Evaluation of two shaping systems and two sonic irrigation devices in removing root canal filling material from distal roots of mandibular molars assessed by micro CT.通过微 CT 评估两种塑形系统和两种声冲洗设备在下颌磨牙远中根根管充填材料去除中的效果。
Int Endod J. 2019 Nov;52(11):1635-1644. doi: 10.1111/iej.13163. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
8
Root fillings with a matched-taper single cone and two calcium silicate-based sealers: an analysis of voids using micro-computed tomography.采用锥形单根管和两种硅酸钙基密封剂进行根管充填:使用微计算机断层扫描分析空隙。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Dec;24(12):4487-4492. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03313-5. Epub 2020 May 7.
9
Efficacy of the ProTaper retreatment system in removing Thermafil, GuttaCore or vertically compacted gutta-percha from curved root canals assessed by micro-CT.采用微 CT 评估 ProTaper 再治疗系统去除弯曲根管中 Thermafil、GuttaCore 或垂直压缩牙胶的效果。
Int Endod J. 2018 Jul;51(7):808-815. doi: 10.1111/iej.12893. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
10
Porosity and sealing ability of root fillings with gutta-percha and BioRoot RCS or AH Plus sealers. Evaluation by three ex vivo methods.采用牙胶与BioRoot RCS或AH Plus封闭剂进行根管充填的孔隙率和封闭能力。通过三种体外方法进行评估。
Int Endod J. 2016 Aug;49(8):774-82. doi: 10.1111/iej.12513. Epub 2015 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of retreatability of three different bioceramic sealers using xylene in root canal retreatment - An cone-beam computed tomography analysis.使用二甲苯对三种不同生物陶瓷封闭剂在根管再治疗中的可再处理性进行比较评估——锥形束计算机断层扫描分析
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Jul;28(7):687-692. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_292_25. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
Calcium silicate-based sealers remnants in isthmuses of mesial roots of mandibular molars: an in vitro evaluation.下颌磨牙近中牙根峡部硅酸钙类封闭剂残留情况:一项体外评估
Restor Dent Endod. 2025 Aug;50(3):e25. doi: 10.5395/rde.2025.50.e25. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
3
Retrieval of AH Plus Bioceramic and Ceraseal Versus AH Plus in Endodontic Retreatment.
AH Plus生物陶瓷和Ceraseal与AH Plus用于牙髓再治疗的疗效比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 8;14(6):1826. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061826.
4
Retreatability of calcium silicate-based sealers based on micro-computed tomographic evaluation - A systematic review.基于微计算机断层扫描评估的硅酸钙基封闭剂的可再处理性——一项系统评价
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Oct;36(10):1278-1294. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.09.011. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
5
Root canal cleanliness and debris extrusion following retreatment of thermoplastic injection technique and bioceramic-based root canal sealer.热塑注射技术和基于生物陶瓷的根管封闭剂再治疗后的根管清洁度和碎屑挤出。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Oct 23;28(11):608. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06005-6.
6
A scientometric, bibliometric, and thematic map analysis of hydraulic calcium silicate root canal sealers.水硬性硅酸钙根管封闭剂的科学计量学、文献计量学和主题地图分析
Restor Dent Endod. 2023 Nov 13;48(4):e41. doi: 10.5395/rde.2023.48.e41. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
Sol-Gel Technologies to Obtain Advanced Bioceramics for Dental Therapeutics.溶胶-凝胶技术获取用于牙科治疗的先进生物陶瓷。
Molecules. 2023 Oct 7;28(19):6967. doi: 10.3390/molecules28196967.
8
Efficacy of Shock Wave-Enhanced Emission Photoacoustic Streaming (SWEEPS) in the Removal of Different Combinations of Sealers Used with Two Obturation Techniques: A Micro-CT Study.冲击波增强发射光声流(SWEEPS)在去除两种充填技术所用不同封闭剂组合方面的疗效:一项显微CT研究
Materials (Basel). 2023 Apr 21;16(8):3273. doi: 10.3390/ma16083273.
9
Efficacy of Reciprocating Instruments in Retreatment of Bioactive and Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers.往复式器械在再治疗生物活性和树脂类根管封闭剂中的疗效。
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2022 Dec;56(4):338-350. doi: 10.15644/asc56/4/1.
10
Efficacy of different Er:YAG laser-activated photoacoustic streaming modes compared to passive ultrasonic irrigation in the retreatment of curved root canals.不同 Er:YAG 激光激活的光声流模式与被动超声冲洗在弯曲根管再治疗中的疗效比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Nov;26(11):6773-6781. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04637-0. Epub 2022 Jul 26.