Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Gundulićeva 5, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Department of Materials, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Nov;26(11):6773-6781. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04637-0. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
To evaluate the efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and super short pulse (SSP) and shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS) modes of Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation (LAI) with two different laser tips, in removing filling remnants after conventional retreatment in severely curved root canals.
The study sample consisted of 40 extracted molars with curved mesiobuccal root canals. The canals were instrumented with ProTaper Next and filled with an epoxy resin-based sealer and gutta-percha using continuous wave vertical compaction and warm injection back-filling. After retreatment with ProTaper Universal Retreatment system and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), all samples were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10) according to the final irrigation technique: PUI, LAI/SSP, SWEEPS/flat-tip, and SWEEPS/radial-tip, using 6 mL of 3% NaOCl for an activation time of 3 × 30 s. The samples were subjected to micro-CT scans after root canal filling, retreatment, and final irrigation. The filling material volume and percentage reduction were calculated.
All tested irrigation techniques were successful in the elimination of the filling remnants after the retreatment (p < 0.001). The LAI/SSP group showed a higher reduction rate than the SWEEPS/flat-tip group (p = 0.032). No significant differences were found between the other groups (p > 0.05).
All tested techniques improved the removal of filling material during retreatment in curved canals. LAI/SSP showed slightly better results than other techniques.
The study highlights the need for additional activated irrigation after the retreatment of curved root canals. The choice between PUI and LAI is not decisive for success.
评估 Er:YAG 激光激活冲洗(LAI)的两种不同激光尖端在经传统再治疗后清除严重弯曲根管中残留的牙胶和封闭剂的效果。
研究样本由 40 颗磨牙组成,近中颊根弯曲。使用 ProTaper Next 根管锉预备根管,采用连续波垂直加压和热塑注射回填法用环氧树脂基封闭剂和牙胶进行根管填充。用 ProTaper Universal 再治疗系统和次氯酸钠(NaOCl)进行再治疗后,所有样本根据最终冲洗技术随机分为四组(n = 10):超声冲洗(PUI)、LAI/SSP、SWEEPS/平头和 SWEEPS/放射状尖端,使用 6 mL 浓度为 3%的 NaOCl,激活时间为 3 × 30 s。在根管填充、再治疗和最终冲洗后,对样本进行微 CT 扫描。计算牙胶和封闭剂的体积和减少百分比。
所有测试的冲洗技术在再治疗后都成功地消除了牙胶和封闭剂的残留(p < 0.001)。LAI/SSP 组的减少率高于 SWEEPS/平头组(p = 0.032)。其他组之间没有发现显著差异(p > 0.05)。
所有测试的技术都提高了在弯曲根管中再治疗时牙胶和封闭剂的去除率。LAI/SSP 比其他技术略好。
本研究强调了在弯曲根管的再治疗后需要额外的激活冲洗。在 PUI 和 LAI 之间的选择对成功与否并不具有决定性。