• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 NIH 工具包认知电池中开发嵌入式绩效有效性指标。

Development of embedded performance validity indicators in the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Windsor.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2021 Jan;33(1):90-96. doi: 10.1037/pas0000958. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1037/pas0000958
PMID:33119374
Abstract

To assess noncredible performance on the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery (NIHTB-CB), we developed embedded validity indicators (EVIs). Data were collected from 98 adults (54.1% female) as part of a prospective multicenter cross-sectional study at 4 mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) specialty clinics. Traditional EVIs and novel item-based EVIs were developed for the NIHTB-CB using the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT) as criterion. The signal detection profile of individual EVIs varied greatly. Multivariate models had superior classification accuracy. Failing ≥4 traditional EVIs at the liberal cutoff or ≥3 at the conservative cutoff produced a good combination of sensitivity (.57 to .61) and specificity (.92 to .94) to MSVT. Combining the traditional and item-based EVIs improved sensitivity (.65 to .70) at comparable specificity (.91 to .95). In conclusion, newly developed EVIs within the NIHTB-CB effectively discriminated between patients who passed versus failed the MSVT. Aggregating EVIs within the same category into validity composites improved signal detection over univariate cutoffs. Item-based EVIs improved classification accuracy over that of traditional EVIs. However, the marginal gains hardly justify the burden of extra calculations. The newly introduced EVIs require cross-validation before wide-spread research or clinical application. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

为了评估 NIH 工具包认知电池(NIHTB-CB)上的不可信表现,我们开发了嵌入式有效性指标(EVIs)。数据来自 98 名成年人(54.1%为女性),作为 4 个轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)专业诊所的前瞻性多中心横断面研究的一部分。使用医学症状效度测试(MSVT)作为标准,为 NIHTB-CB 开发了传统的 EVIs 和基于新项目的 EVIs。个体 EVIs 的信号检测特征差异很大。多变量模型具有更高的分类准确性。在宽松截止值下失败≥4 个传统 EVIs 或在保守截止值下失败≥3 个传统 EVIs 时,对 MSVT 的敏感性(.57 至.61)和特异性(.92 至.94)具有良好的组合。将传统和基于项目的 EVIs 相结合可提高敏感性(.65 至.70),同时保持特异性(.91 至.95)不变。总之,NIHTB-CB 中开发的新 EVIs 可有效区分通过和未通过 MSVT 的患者。将同一类别内的 EVIs 聚合到有效性综合指标中可提高比单变量截止值更好的信号检测。基于项目的 EVIs 提高了传统 EVIs 的分类准确性。然而,边际收益几乎不能证明额外计算的负担是合理的。新引入的 EVIs 需要在广泛研究或临床应用之前进行交叉验证。

相似文献

1
Development of embedded performance validity indicators in the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery.在 NIH 工具包认知电池中开发嵌入式绩效有效性指标。
Psychol Assess. 2021 Jan;33(1):90-96. doi: 10.1037/pas0000958. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
2
Performance Validity Testing on the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery: Base Rates of Failed Embedded Validity Indicators in the Adult Normative Sample.NIH 工具包认知电池的性能有效性测试:成人常模样本中嵌入有效性指标失败的基础率。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Feb 19;39(2):204-213. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acad071.
3
Stronger Together: The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition as a Multivariate Performance Validity Test in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.携手共进:韦氏成人智力量表第四版作为创伤性脑损伤患者的多元表现效度测试
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Feb 20;35(2):188-204. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acz032.
4
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) processing speed scores as measures of noncredible responding: The third generation of embedded performance validity indicators.作为不可信反应指标的韦氏成人智力量表第四版(WAIS-IV)加工速度得分:第三代嵌入式效标效度指标
Psychol Assess. 2017 Feb;29(2):148-157. doi: 10.1037/pas0000319. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
5
Using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) in individuals with traumatic brain injury.在创伤性脑损伤个体中使用 NIH 工具包认知电池(NIHTB-CB)。
Rehabil Psychol. 2017 Nov;62(4):413-424. doi: 10.1037/rep0000174.
6
Noncredible effort on the Nonverbal-Medical Symptom Validity Test (NV-MSVT): Impact on cognitive performance in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.非言语-医学症状效度测试(NV-MSVT)中的不可信表现:对小儿轻度创伤性脑损伤认知表现的影响
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2020 Oct-Dec;9(4):367-374. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2020.1742717. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
7
NIH toolbox cognition tests following traumatic brain injury: Frequency of low scores.NIH 工具包认知测验在创伤性脑损伤后的应用:低分数的频率。
Rehabil Psychol. 2017 Nov;62(4):474-484. doi: 10.1037/rep0000145.
8
Construct validity of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in individuals with stroke.NIH 工具包认知电池在中风患者中的构念效度。
Rehabil Psychol. 2017 Nov;62(4):443-454. doi: 10.1037/rep0000195.
9
Psychometric Properties of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in Healthy Older Adults: Reliability, Validity, and Agreement with Standard Neuropsychological Tests.《NIH 工具包认知电池在健康老年人中的心理测量特性:信度、效度和与标准神经心理学测试的一致性》
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019 Sep;25(8):857-867. doi: 10.1017/S1355617719000614. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
10
Aggregating validity indicators embedded in Conners' CPT-II outperforms individual cutoffs at separating valid from invalid performance in adults with traumatic brain injury.在区分创伤性脑损伤成人的有效与无效表现方面,汇总嵌入在康纳斯连续操作测验第二版(Conners' CPT-II)中的效度指标比单个临界值表现更优。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2014 Aug;29(5):456-66. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acu026. Epub 2014 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Intraindividual variability on the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery: Sociodemographic comparisons and test-retest reliability of dispersion in cognitive test scores.美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知测试组合中的个体内变异性:社会人口统计学比较及认知测试分数离散度的重测信度
Clin Neuropsychol. 2025 May 27:1-15. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2025.2510332.
2
Performance validity testing: the need for digital technology and where to go from here.性能效度测试:数字技术的需求及未来发展方向
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 13;15:1452462. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1452462. eCollection 2024.
3
Performance Validity Testing on the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery: Base Rates of Failed Embedded Validity Indicators in the Adult Normative Sample.
NIH 工具包认知电池的性能有效性测试:成人常模样本中嵌入有效性指标失败的基础率。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Feb 19;39(2):204-213. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acad071.
4
Development and application of novel performance validity metrics for computerized neurocognitive batteries.新型计算机神经认知成套测验的性能效度指标的开发与应用。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2023 Oct;29(8):789-797. doi: 10.1017/S1355617722000893. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
5
Flipping the Script: Measuring Both Performance Validity and Cognitive Ability with the Forced Choice Recognition Trial of the RCFT.翻转脚本:使用 RCFT 的迫选识别试验同时测量绩效有效性和认知能力。
Percept Mot Skills. 2021 Aug;128(4):1373-1408. doi: 10.1177/00315125211019704. Epub 2021 May 22.