Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Department of Emergency Medicine and the Yale Developmental Neurocognitive Driving Simulation Research Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020 Oct 12;21(sup1):S60-S65. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1830382. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
Prehospital non-transport events occur when emergency medicine service (EMS) providers respond to a scene, but the patient is ultimately not transported to a hospital for evaluation. The objective of this study was to determine the rate of non-transport of pediatric patients who were involved in a motor vehicle collision (MVC) and the factors associated with non-transport decisions.
We searched the National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS) database using ICD-10 mechanism of injury codes to identify cases in which EMS responded to a pediatric occupant (age < 18 years) who had been involved in an MVC. We excluded interfacility transports, scene assists, deaths at the scene, and collisions that occurred outside the US. The outcome of interest was if pediatric patients were not transported to a hospital for evaluation. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis to identify which risk factors were associated with non-transport. We also analyzed regional variation and the reasons recorded for not transporting patients.
We identified 92,254 pediatric patients who were evaluated by EMS after an MVC, of which 31,404 (34.0%) were not transported to a hospital for evaluation. In our adjusted analysis, the factors associated with non-transport were age <1 year or >16 years, male sex, normal Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS = 15), level of training of EMS providers, response time later than 6 a.m., and region of the country. GCS was the most important factor, with only 3.0% (108/3,616) of patients not transported who had abnormal GCS (< 15). In cases of non-transport, 32.7% (10257) were due to patient or caregiver refusal, and 33.3% (10,442) were due to patients being discharged against medical advice. Only 11.5% (3,627) pediatric patients who were not transported were discharged based on an established protocol.
Pediatric patients were not transported after EMS responded to an MVC in approximately one-third of cases, and there was considerable variation in the rate of non-transports based on geographic region, provider level, and time of day. The majority of non-transports occurred because patients were discharged against medical advice or the patient/caregiver refused transport, which may indicate conflicting priorities between EMS providers and patients.
当急诊医疗服务(EMS)提供者对现场做出反应,但最终患者未被送往医院进行评估时,就会发生院前非转运事件。本研究的目的是确定参与机动车碰撞(MVC)的儿科患者非转运的比率,以及与非转运决策相关的因素。
我们使用国际疾病分类第 10 版(ICD-10)损伤机制代码在国家紧急医疗服务信息系统(NEMSIS)数据库中进行搜索,以确定 EMS 对参与 MVC 的儿科患者(年龄<18 岁)做出反应的病例。我们排除了机构间转运、现场协助、现场死亡和发生在美国境外的碰撞。研究的结局是儿科患者是否未被送往医院进行评估。我们进行了单变量和多变量分析,以确定与非转运相关的风险因素。我们还分析了区域差异和未转运患者的记录原因。
我们确定了 92254 名在 MVC 后由 EMS 评估的儿科患者,其中 31404 名(34.0%)未被送往医院进行评估。在调整分析中,与非转运相关的因素是年龄<1 岁或>16 岁、男性、正常格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS=15)、EMS 提供者的培训水平、反应时间晚于上午 6 点,以及国家的地区。GCS 是最重要的因素,只有 3.0%(108/3616)未转运的患者 GCS 异常(<15)。在非转运的情况下,32.7%(10257)是由于患者或护理人员拒绝,33.3%(10442)是由于患者未经医嘱出院。只有 11.5%(3627)未转运的儿科患者是根据既定方案出院的。
在 EMS 对 MVC 做出反应后,大约三分之一的儿科患者未被转运,并且根据地理位置、提供者级别和一天中的时间,非转运率存在相当大的差异。大多数非转运是因为患者未经医嘱出院或患者/护理人员拒绝转运,这可能表明 EMS 提供者和患者之间存在冲突的优先级。