Suppr超能文献

儿科转运期间院前急救人员对静脉导管的使用情况。

Utilization of Intravenous Catheters by Prehospital Providers during Pediatric Transports.

作者信息

VanderKooy Timothy, Spaur Kelsey, Brou Lina, Caffrey Sean, Adelgais Kathleen M

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Jan-Feb;22(1):50-57. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1347225. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Prehospital intravenous (IV) access in children may be difficult and time-consuming. Emergency Medical Service (EMS) protocols often dictate IV placement; however, some IV catheters may not be needed. The scene and transport time associated with attempting IV access in children is unknown. The objective of this study is to examine differences in scene and transport times associated with prehospital IV catheter attempt and utilization patterns of these catheters during pediatric prehospital encounters.

METHODS

Three non-blinded investigators abstracted EMS and hospital records of children 0-18 years of age transported by EMS to a pediatric emergency department (ED). We compared patients in which prehospital IV access was attempted to those with no documented attempt. Our primary outcome was scene time. Secondary outcomes include utilization of the IV catheter in the prehospital and ED settings and a determination of whether the catheter was indicated based on a priori established criteria (prehospital IV medication administration, hypotension, GCS < 13, and ICU admission).

RESULTS

We reviewed 1,138 records, 545 meeting inclusion criteria. IV catheter placement was attempted in 27% (n = 149) with success in 77% (n = 111). There was no difference in the presence of hypotension or median GCS between groups. Mean scene time (12.5 vs. 11.8 minutes) and transport time (16.9 vs. 14.6 minutes) were similar. Prehospital IV medications were given in 38.7% (43/111). One patient received a prehospital IV medication with no alternative route of administration. Among patients with a prehospital IV attempt, 31% (46/149) received IV medications in the ED and 23% (34/396) received IV fluids in the ED. Mean time to use of the IV in the ED was 70 minutes after arrival. Patients with prehospital IV attempt were more likely to receive IV medication within 30 minutes of ED arrival (39.1% vs. 19.0%, p = 0.04). Overall, 34.2% of IV attempts were indicated.

CONCLUSIONS

Prehospital IV catheter placement in children is not associated with an increase in scene or transport time. Prehospital IV catheters were used in approximately one-third of patients. Further study is needed to determine which children may benefit most from IV access in the prehospital setting.

摘要

引言

儿童院前静脉穿刺可能困难且耗时。紧急医疗服务(EMS)协议通常规定了静脉置管;然而,一些静脉导管可能并不需要。与尝试对儿童进行静脉穿刺相关的现场时间和转运时间尚不清楚。本研究的目的是探讨与院前静脉导管尝试相关的现场时间和转运时间的差异,以及在儿科院前救治过程中这些导管的使用模式。

方法

三名非盲法研究者提取了由EMS转运至儿科急诊科(ED)的0至18岁儿童的EMS和医院记录。我们将尝试进行院前静脉穿刺的患者与未记录有尝试的患者进行了比较。我们的主要结局是现场时间。次要结局包括在院前和ED环境中静脉导管的使用情况,以及根据预先确定的标准(院前静脉用药、低血压、格拉斯哥昏迷评分[GCS]<13和入住重症监护病房)确定导管是否有指征。

结果

我们审查了1138份记录,545份符合纳入标准。27%(n = 149)的患者尝试进行静脉导管置入,其中77%(n = 111)成功。两组之间低血压的存在情况或GCS中位数没有差异。平均现场时间(12.5分钟对11.8分钟)和转运时间(16.9分钟对14.6分钟)相似。38.7%(43/111)的患者给予了院前静脉用药。一名患者接受了院前静脉用药且没有其他给药途径。在尝试进行院前静脉穿刺的患者中,31%(46/149)在ED接受了静脉用药,23%(34/396)在ED接受了静脉输液。在ED使用静脉导管的平均时间是到达后70分钟。尝试进行院前静脉穿刺的患者在ED到达后30分钟内更有可能接受静脉用药(39.1%对19.0%,p = 0.04)。总体而言,34.2%的静脉穿刺尝试是有指征的。

结论

儿童院前静脉导管置入与现场时间或转运时间的增加无关。大约三分之一的患者使用了院前静脉导管。需要进一步研究以确定哪些儿童可能从院前静脉穿刺中获益最大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验