• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

圭亚那提供艾滋病护理的成本和艾滋病资源的最佳配置。

Costs of providing HIV care and optimal allocation of HIV resources in Guyana.

机构信息

Division of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.

Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 29;15(10):e0238499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238499. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0238499
PMID:33119591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7595312/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Great strides in responding to the HIV epidemic have led to improved access to and uptake of HIV services in Guyana, a lower-middle-income country with a generalized HIV epidemic. Despite efforts to scale up HIV treatment and adopt the test and start strategy, little is known about costs of HIV services across the care cascade.

METHODS

We collected cost data from the national laboratory and nine selected treatment facilities in five of the country's ten Regions, and estimated the costs associated with HIV testing and services (HTS) and antiretroviral therapy (ART) from a provider perspective from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. We then used the unit costs to construct four resource allocation scenarios. In the first two scenarios, we calculated how close Guyana would currently be to its 2020 targets if the allocation of funding across programs and regions over 2017-2020 had (a) remained unchanged from latest-reported levels, or (b) been optimally distributed to minimize incidence and deaths. In the next two, we estimated the resources that would have been required to meet the 2020 targets if those resources had been distributed (a) according to latest-reported patterns, or (b) optimally to minimize incidence and deaths.

RESULTS

The mean cost per test was US$15 and the mean cost per person tested positive was US$796. The mean annual cost per of maintaining established adult and pediatric patients on ART were US$428 and US$410, respectively. The mean annual cost of maintaining virally suppressed patients was US$648. Cost variation across sites may suggest opportunities for improvements in efficiency, or may reflect variation in facility type and patient volume. There may also be scope for improvements in allocative efficiency; we estimated a 28% reduction in the total resources required to meet Guyana's 2020 targets if funds had been optimally distributed to minimize infections and deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide the first estimates of costs along the HIV cascade in the Caribbean and assessed efficiencies using novel context-specific data on the costs associated with diagnostic, treatment, and viral suppression. The findings call for better targeting of services, and efficient service delivery models and resource allocation, while scaling up HIV services to maximize investment impact.

摘要

简介

在圭亚那,艾滋病毒应对工作取得了重大进展,艾滋病毒服务的可及性和利用率得到提高,圭亚那是一个中低收入国家,艾滋病毒流行广泛。尽管努力扩大艾滋病毒治疗规模并采用检测和启动战略,但对整个护理链中艾滋病毒服务的成本知之甚少。

方法

我们从国家实验室和该国五个地区的九个选定治疗设施收集了成本数据,并从提供者的角度估算了 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间与艾滋病毒检测和服务(HTS)以及抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)相关的成本。然后,我们使用单位成本构建了四个资源分配方案。在头两个方案中,我们计算了如果 2017-2020 年期间方案和地区之间的资金分配(a)保持最新报告水平不变,或者(b)最优分配以最大限度地减少发病率和死亡率,圭亚那目前将接近其 2020 年目标的程度。在接下来的两个方案中,我们估计了如果资源(a)根据最新报告模式分配,或者(b)最优分配以最大限度地减少发病率和死亡率,将满足 2020 年目标所需的资源。

结果

每次检测的平均费用为 15 美元,每次检测阳性的平均费用为 796 美元。维持成年和儿科患者接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的每年平均费用分别为 428 美元和 410 美元。维持病毒抑制患者的年平均费用为 648 美元。不同地点的成本差异可能表明提高效率的机会,或者可能反映设施类型和患者数量的差异。在资源分配效率方面也可能有改进的空间;我们估计,如果资金最优分配以最大限度地减少感染和死亡,满足圭亚那 2020 年目标所需的总资源将减少 28%。

结论

我们提供了加勒比地区艾滋病毒护理链成本的首次估计,并使用与诊断、治疗和病毒抑制相关成本的新型特定于上下文的数据评估了效率。这些发现呼吁更好地针对服务,并提高服务提供模式和资源分配的效率,同时扩大艾滋病毒服务规模,以最大限度地提高投资效果。

相似文献

1
Costs of providing HIV care and optimal allocation of HIV resources in Guyana.圭亚那提供艾滋病护理的成本和艾滋病资源的最佳配置。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 29;15(10):e0238499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238499. eCollection 2020.
2
Kazakhstan can achieve ambitious HIV targets despite expected donor withdrawal by combining improved ART procurement mechanisms with allocative and implementation efficiencies.哈萨克斯坦可以通过将改进的抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)采购机制与分配及实施效率相结合,来实现宏伟的艾滋病病毒防治目标,尽管预计会有捐助方撤资。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 16;12(2):e0169530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169530. eCollection 2017.
3
Can differentiated care models solve the crisis in HIV treatment financing? Analysis of prospects for 38 countries in sub-Saharan Africa.差异化护理模式能否解决艾滋病治疗资金危机?对撒哈拉以南非洲38个国家的前景分析。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Jul 21;20(Suppl 4):21648. doi: 10.7448/IAS.20.5.21648.
4
Efficiency of HIV services in Nigeria: Determinants of unit cost variation of HIV counseling and testing and prevention of mother-to-child transmission interventions.尼日利亚的艾滋病毒服务效率:艾滋病毒咨询和检测以及预防母婴传播干预措施单位成本变化的决定因素。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 7;13(9):e0201706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201706. eCollection 2018.
5
How should HIV resources be allocated? Lessons learnt from applying Optima HIV in 23 countries.应当如何分配艾滋病毒防治资源?从 23 个国家应用 Optima HIV 中吸取的经验教训。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2018 Apr;21(4):e25097. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25097.
6
Allocative and implementation efficiency in HIV prevention and treatment for people who inject drugs.注射吸毒者预防和治疗艾滋病毒方面的分配效率和实施效率。
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Dec;38:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
7
Optimal allocation of HIV resources among geographical regions.HIV 资源在地理区域间的最优分配。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):1509. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7681-5.
8
Assessing the costs and efficiency of HIV testing and treatment services in rural Malawi: implications for future "test and start" strategies.评估马拉维农村地区艾滋病毒检测和治疗服务的成本和效率:对未来“检测即治疗”策略的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):740. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05446-5.
9
Optimizing HIV/AIDS resources in Armenia: increasing ART investment and examining HIV programmes for seasonal migrant labourers.优化亚美尼亚的艾滋病毒/艾滋病资源:增加抗逆转录病毒治疗投资并审查针对季节性流动劳工的艾滋病毒项目。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2016 Jun 7;19(1):20772. doi: 10.7448/IAS.19.1.20772. eCollection 2016.
10
Reorienting the HIV response in Niger toward sex work interventions: from better evidence to targeted and expanded practice.将尼日尔的艾滋病毒应对措施重新调整为以性工作干预为重点:从更好的证据到有针对性和扩大的实践。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015 Mar 1;68 Suppl 2:S213-20. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000456.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal allocation of HIV resources among geographical regions.HIV 资源在地理区域间的最优分配。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):1509. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7681-5.
2
How should HIV resources be allocated? Lessons learnt from applying Optima HIV in 23 countries.应当如何分配艾滋病毒防治资源?从 23 个国家应用 Optima HIV 中吸取的经验教训。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2018 Apr;21(4):e25097. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25097.
3
Targeting the right interventions to the right people and places: the role of geospatial analysis in HIV program planning.
针对合适的人群和地点采取正确的干预措施:地理空间分析在艾滋病项目规划中的作用。
AIDS. 2018 May 15;32(8):957-963. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001792.
4
Costs of facility-based HIV testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe.马拉维、赞比亚和津巴布韦基于医疗机构的艾滋病毒检测成本。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 16;12(10):e0185740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185740. eCollection 2017.
5
Costs along the service cascades for HIV testing and counselling and prevention of mother-to-child transmission.艾滋病病毒检测与咨询以及预防母婴传播服务链上的成本。
AIDS. 2016 Oct 23;30(16):2495-2504. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001208.
6
Optimum resource allocation to reduce HIV incidence across sub-Saharan Africa: a mathematical modelling study.优化资源配置以降低撒哈拉以南非洲的艾滋病发病率:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet HIV. 2016 Sep;3(9):e441-e448. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30051-0. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
7
PEPFAR Transitions to Country Ownership: Review of Past Donor Transitions and Application of Lessons Learned to the Eastern Caribbean.PEPFAR 向国家主导过渡:回顾过去的捐助方过渡情况,并将经验教训应用于东加勒比地区。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015 Jun 17;3(2):274-86. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00227.
8
Optima: A Model for HIV Epidemic Analysis, Program Prioritization, and Resource Optimization.Optima:一种用于艾滋病流行分析、项目优先级确定和资源优化的模型。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015 Jul 1;69(3):365-76. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000605.
9
Maximising the effect of combination HIV prevention through prioritisation of the people and places in greatest need: a modelling study.通过优先考虑最需要的人群和地点,最大限度地提高组合 HIV 预防效果:建模研究。
Lancet. 2014 Jul 19;384(9939):249-56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61053-9.
10
Lessons learned from stakeholder-driven sustainability analysis of six national HIV programmes.从六个国家艾滋病项目的利益相关者驱动的可持续性分析中吸取的经验教训。
Health Policy Plan. 2014 May;29(3):379-87. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt024. Epub 2013 Apr 23.