Kreyenmeier Philipp, Deubel Heiner, Hanning Nina M
Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Allgemeine und Experimentelle Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany.
Allgemeine und Experimentelle Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany.
Cortex. 2020 Dec;133:133-148. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.020. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
Attention shifts that precede goal-directed eye and hand movements are regarded as markers of motor target selection. Whether effectors compete for a single, shared attentional resource during simultaneous eye-hand movements or whether attentional resources can be allocated independently towards multiple target locations is controversially debated. Independent, effector-specific target selection mechanisms underlying parallel allocation of visuospatial attention to saccade and reach targets would predict an increase of the overall attention capacity with the number of active effectors. We test this hypothesis in a modified Theory of Visual Attention (TVA; Bundesen, 1990) paradigm. Participants reported briefly presented letters during eye, hand, or combined eye-hand movement preparation to centrally cued locations. Modeling the data according to TVA allowed us to assess both the overall attention capacity and the deployment of visual attention to individual locations in the visual work space. In two experiments, we show that attention is predominantly allocated to the motor targets-without pronounced competition between effectors. The parallel benefits at eye and hand targets, however, have concomitant costs at non-motor locations, and the overall attention capacity does not increase by the simultaneous recruitment of both effector systems. Moreover, premotor shifts of attention dominate over voluntary deployment of processing resources, yielding severe impairments of voluntary attention allocation. We conclude that attention shifts to multiple effector targets without mutual competition given that sufficient processing resources can be withdrawn from movement-irrelevant locations.
在目标导向的眼动和手动运动之前发生的注意力转移被视为运动目标选择的标志。在同时进行眼手运动时,效应器是竞争单一的共享注意力资源,还是注意力资源可以独立分配到多个目标位置,这一问题存在争议。视觉空间注意力并行分配到扫视和伸手目标背后的独立、特定于效应器的目标选择机制,将预测随着活跃效应器数量的增加,整体注意力容量会增加。我们在一个修改后的视觉注意理论(TVA;Bundesen,1990)范式中检验了这一假设。参与者在眼睛、手部或眼手联合运动准备期间,报告短暂呈现于中央提示位置的字母。根据TVA对数据进行建模,使我们能够评估整体注意力容量以及视觉注意在视觉工作空间中各个位置的分配情况。在两个实验中,我们表明注意力主要分配到运动目标上,效应器之间没有明显竞争。然而,眼睛和手部目标的并行益处伴随着非运动位置的代价,并且同时招募两个效应器系统并不会增加整体注意力容量。此外,运动前的注意力转移比自愿分配处理资源更占主导地位,导致自愿注意力分配严重受损。我们得出结论,鉴于可以从与运动无关的位置撤回足够的处理资源,注意力会转移到多个效应器目标上且互不竞争。