• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意力引导视觉觅食中的行动。

Attention directs actions in visual foraging.

作者信息

Tünnermann Jan, Schubö Anna

机构信息

Cognitive Neuroscience of Perception and Action, Department of Psychology, Philipps-University Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 May 6;15(1):15788. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97986-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-97986-1
PMID:40328870
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12056034/
Abstract

Visual foraging tasks, where participants collect items by touching or clicking on them, have become popular for investigating visual search. They probe selective attention in multi-target contexts through naturalistic goal-directed actions, unlike the button presses used in many other paradigms. Despite their potential, such tasks had not been used to examine the interplay of attention and goal-directed actions until now, even though this topic has been extensively studied with other paradigms and has significant implications for understanding human visual behavior in the real world. In this study, we applied the visual foraging paradigm to address this gap. We found that attentional prioritization of one part in a two-part compound object is accompanied by a motor bias in the collecting action (stylus tap) toward the prioritized part. This bias combines with motor precision demands, such as aiming for stable contact points. Our findings show that action planning not only modulates the attentional landscape at large but also that attentional asymmetries (e.g., prioritizing one object part) feed back into the motor system, combining with motoric factors to refine goal-directed actions.

摘要

视觉觅食任务,即参与者通过触摸或点击物品来收集它们,已成为研究视觉搜索的常用方法。与许多其他范式中使用的按键操作不同,它们通过自然的目标导向行为在多目标情境中探究选择性注意。尽管具有潜力,但直到现在,此类任务尚未用于检验注意力与目标导向行为之间的相互作用,即便该主题已通过其他范式得到广泛研究,且对理解现实世界中的人类视觉行为具有重要意义。在本研究中,我们应用视觉觅食范式来填补这一空白。我们发现,在由两部分组成的复合物体中,对其中一部分的注意力优先级伴随着收集动作(触控笔点击)中朝向优先级部分的运动偏向。这种偏向与运动精度要求相结合,比如瞄准稳定的接触点。我们的研究结果表明,动作规划不仅在很大程度上调节注意力格局,而且注意力不对称(例如,优先考虑一个物体部分)会反馈到运动系统中,与运动因素相结合以优化目标导向行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f1b/12056034/a13d87926464/41598_2025_97986_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f1b/12056034/979c18310ef9/41598_2025_97986_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f1b/12056034/4fdbd1f1a318/41598_2025_97986_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f1b/12056034/9c70f1e32ab7/41598_2025_97986_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f1b/12056034/ea8a8fafcac0/41598_2025_97986_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f1b/12056034/16fdf18212b4/41598_2025_97986_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f1b/12056034/f7cf3104c36d/41598_2025_97986_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f1b/12056034/a13d87926464/41598_2025_97986_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f1b/12056034/979c18310ef9/41598_2025_97986_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f1b/12056034/4fdbd1f1a318/41598_2025_97986_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f1b/12056034/9c70f1e32ab7/41598_2025_97986_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f1b/12056034/ea8a8fafcac0/41598_2025_97986_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f1b/12056034/16fdf18212b4/41598_2025_97986_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f1b/12056034/f7cf3104c36d/41598_2025_97986_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f1b/12056034/a13d87926464/41598_2025_97986_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Attention directs actions in visual foraging.注意力引导视觉觅食中的行动。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 6;15(1):15788. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97986-1.
2
Allocation of attention for dissociated visual and motor goals.注意分配对分离的视觉和运动目标。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Apr;226(2):209-19. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3426-3. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
3
Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks.视觉注意力在觅食任务中的动态变化。
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104032. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104032. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
4
What first drives visual attention during the recognition of object-directed actions? The role of kinematics and goal information.在识别目标导向动作的过程中,是什么首先驱动视觉注意力?运动学和目标信息的作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Oct;81(7):2400-2409. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01784-7.
5
Visual Short-Term Memory Activity in Parietal Lobe Reflects Cognitive Processes beyond Attentional Selection.顶叶皮层的视觉短期记忆活动反映了注意力选择之外的认知过程。
J Neurosci. 2018 Feb 7;38(6):1511-1519. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1716-17.2017. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
6
Higher visuo-Attentional Demands of Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) Lead to A Lower Precision in Pointing Movements.多目标跟踪(MOT)中更高的视觉注意力需求导致指向运动的精度降低。
J Gen Psychol. 2018 Apr-Jun;145(2):134-152. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2018.1437385. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
7
Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.工作记忆的注意引导因范式而异:一种个体差异方法。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Apr;77(3):704-12. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0847-z.
8
Choosing attentional control settings in a dynamically changing environment.在动态变化的环境中选择注意力控制设置。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):2031-48. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1125-4.
9
Decomposing the action effect: how simple actions affect subsequent perception.分解动作效应:简单动作如何影响后续感知。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 May;76(4):1242-52. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0652-0.
10
Simple action planning can affect attentional allocation in subsequent visual search.简单动作规划会影响后续视觉搜索中的注意力分配。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Oct;27(5):1014-1024. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01758-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Picking the right piece: Action intentions shape visual search and action planning in human multi-target-foraging.挑选合适的目标:行动意图塑造人类多目标觅食中的视觉搜索和行动规划。
iScience. 2025 May 13;28(6):112656. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112656. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction.争议术语:指导视觉干扰科学论述的共识定义。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1445-1472. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02820-3. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
2
Increased display complexity reveals effects of salience in action control.展示复杂度的增加揭示了突显效应对动作控制的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Oct;49(10):1345-1359. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001151.
3
PyMC: a modern, and comprehensive probabilistic programming framework in Python.
PyMC:Python 中一个现代且全面的概率编程框架。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Sep 1;9:e1516. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1516. eCollection 2023.
4
Testing a relational account of search templates in visual foraging.测试视觉觅食中搜索模板的关系解释。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 2;13(1):12541. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38362-9.
5
Good-enough attentional guidance.良好的注意力引导。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Apr;27(4):391-403. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
6
Having several options does not increase the time it takes to make a movement to an adequate end point.有多个选项并不会增加将动作移动到适当终点所需的时间。
Exp Brain Res. 2022 Jun;240(6):1849-1871. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06376-w. Epub 2022 May 12.
7
How feature context alters attentional template switching.特征语境如何改变注意模板转换。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Nov;47(11):1431-1444. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000951. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
8
Target value and prevalence influence visual foraging in younger and older age.目标值和流行率影响年轻和老年的视觉觅食。
Vision Res. 2021 Sep;186:87-102. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 29.
9
Eye movements are not mandatorily preceded by the N2pc component.眼球运动不一定先于 N2pc 成分。
Psychophysiology. 2021 Jun;58(6):e13821. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13821. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
10
Theory of visual attention (TVA) in action: Assessing premotor attention in simultaneous eye-hand movements.视觉注意理论(TVA)的应用:评估同时进行眼手运动时的运动前注意
Cortex. 2020 Dec;133:133-148. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.020. Epub 2020 Oct 8.