Özkan Ünal Emel, Özdil Fulya, Kaplan Selçuk, Gürcan Eser Kemal, Genç Serdar, Arat Sezen, Soysal Mehmet İhsan
Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ 59030, Turkey.
Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ 59030, Turkey.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 27;10(11):1970. doi: 10.3390/ani10111970.
In this study, to analyze the mtDNA D-loop region and the origin of the maternal lineages of 16 different donkey populations, and to assess the domestication of Turkish indigenous donkeys in seven geographical regions, we investigated the DNA sequences of the D-loop region of 315 indigenous donkeys from Turkey. A total of 54 haplotypes, resulting from 35 polymorphic regions (27 parsimoniously informative and 6 singleton sites), were defined. Twenty-eight of these haplotypes are unique (51.85%), and 26 are shared among different Turkish indigenous donkey populations. The most frequent haplotype was Hap 1 (45.71%), followed by two haplotypes (Hap 4, 15.55% and Hap 7, 5.39%). The breed genetic diversity, evaluated by the haplotype diversity (H) and nucleotide diversity (π), for the Turkish donkey populations ranged from 0.533 ± 0.180 (Tekirdağ-Malkara, MAL) to 0.933 ± 0.122 (Aydin, AYD), and from 0.01196 ± 0.0026 (Antalya, ANT) to 0.02101 ± 0.0041 (Aydin, AYD), respectively. We observed moderate-to-high levels of haplotype diversity and moderate nucleotide diversity, indicating plentiful genetic diversity in all of the Turkish indigenous donkey populations. Phylogenetic analysis (NJT) and median-joining network analysis established that all haplotypes were distinctly grouped into two major haplogroups. The results of AMOVA analyses, based on geographic structuring of Turkish native donkey populations, highlighted that the majority of the observed variance is due to differences among samples within populations. The observed differences between groups were found to be statistically significant. Comparison among Turkish indigenous donkey mtDNA D-loop regions and haplotypes, and different countries' donkey breeds and wild asses, identified two clades and which is named Somali (Clade IV) and Nubian (Clade V) lineages. The results can be used to understand the origin of Turkish donkey populations clearly, and to resolve the phylogenetic relationship among all of the different regions.
在本研究中,为了分析16个不同驴种群的线粒体DNA D环区域及母系谱系起源,并评估土耳其七个地理区域的本土驴的驯化情况,我们调查了来自土耳其的315头本土驴的D环区域DNA序列。共确定了54种单倍型,这些单倍型来自35个多态性区域(27个简约信息位点和6个单一位点)。其中28种单倍型是独特的(51.85%),26种在不同的土耳其本土驴种群中共享。最常见的单倍型是单倍型1(Hap 1,45.71%),其次是两种单倍型(单倍型4,15.55%和单倍型7,5.39%)。通过单倍型多样性(H)和核苷酸多样性(π)评估的土耳其驴种群的品种遗传多样性,范围分别为0.533±0.180(泰基尔达-马尔卡拉,MAL)至0.933±0.122(艾登,AYD),以及0.01196±0.0026(安塔利亚,ANT)至0.0210±0.0041(艾登,AYD)。我们观察到单倍型多样性处于中高水平,核苷酸多样性处于中等水平,这表明所有土耳其本土驴种群都具有丰富的遗传多样性。系统发育分析(NJT)和中介网络分析表明,所有单倍型明显分为两个主要单倍群。基于土耳其本土驴种群地理结构的AMOVA分析结果突出显示,观察到的大部分变异是由于种群内样本之间的差异。发现组间观察到的差异具有统计学意义。对土耳其本土驴线粒体DNA D环区域和单倍型与不同国家的驴品种及野驴进行比较,确定了两个进化枝,分别命名为索马里(进化枝IV)和努比亚(进化枝V)谱系。这些结果可用于清晰了解土耳其驴种群的起源,并解析所有不同区域之间的系统发育关系。