Chest Tube Drainage Versus Conservative Management as the Initial Treatment of Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare chest tube drainage and conservative management as the initial treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). Studies including PSP patients who received tube drainage or conservative management as the initial treatment were searched in OVID-MEDLINE and Embase through 14 February 2020. The primary outcome was the relative risk (RR) of PSP recurrence, and secondary outcomes were RRs of PSP resolution and adverse events during treatment. A random-effect model using the Mantel-Haenszel method was used to pool RRs. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to investigate significant predictors of PSP recurrence. In total, 11,922 PSP cases from eight studies were analysed, of which 6344 were treated with tube drainage and 5578 were treated with conservative management. The pooled RR of PSP recurrence for conservative management against tube drainage was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.28; = 0.894). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses revealed that study design ( = 0.816), allocation of the PSP amount in each management group ( = 0.191), and assessment time for recurrence had no significant impact on PSP recurrence ( = 0.816). There was no publication bias ( = 0.475). The risk of adverse events of conservative management was significantly lower than that of tube drainage (pooled RR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-1.15; = 0.003). However, no difference was found between the two groups in terms of PSP resolution (pooled RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.9-1.15; = 0.814). As the initial treatment for PSP, conservative management is comparable to chest tube drainage in terms of PSP recurrence and resolution after treatment, with fewer adverse events during treatment.