• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Conservative versus invasive treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a retrospective cohort study.原发性自发性气胸的保守治疗与侵入性治疗:一项回顾性队列研究
Acute Med Surg. 2014 May 19;1(4):195-199. doi: 10.1002/ams2.33. eCollection 2014 Oct.
2
Conservative versus invasive management of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax: a retrospective cohort study.继发性自发性气胸的保守治疗与侵入性治疗:一项回顾性队列研究
Acute Med Surg. 2021 May 7;8(1):e663. doi: 10.1002/ams2.663. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
3
Management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in Chinese children.中国儿童原发性自发性气胸的管理。
Hong Kong Med J. 2010 Apr;16(2):94-100.
4
Spontaneous primary and secondary pneumothorax: a 10-year study of management alternatives.原发性和继发性自发性气胸:一项关于治疗选择的10年研究
Can J Surg. 1994 Jun;37(3):197-202.
5
Conservative management of traumatic pneumothoraces: A retrospective cohort study.创伤性气胸的保守治疗:一项回顾性队列研究。
Emerg Med Australas. 2022 Apr;34(2):194-198. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13846. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
6
What is the difference in size of spontaneous pneumothorax between inspiratory and expiratory x-rays?自发性气胸在吸气相和呼气相 X 光片上的大小差异有何不同?
Emerg Med J. 2009 Dec;26(12):861-3. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.068742.
7
Comparison of size classification of primary spontaneous pneumothorax by three international guidelines: a case for international consensus?三种国际指南对原发性自发性气胸大小分类的比较:是否需要国际共识?
Respir Med. 2008 Dec;102(12):1830-2. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.07.026. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
8
Utilization and Outcomes of Observation for Spontaneous Pneumothorax at an Integrated Health System.综合医疗系统中自发性气胸观察的利用和结果。
J Surg Res. 2023 Aug;288:28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.02.031. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
9
Management and outcome of spontaneous pneumothoraces at three urban EDs.三家城市急诊室自发性气胸的管理与治疗结果
Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Oct;19(5):449-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.01011.x.
10
Outcomes of emergency department patients treated for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.因原发性自发性气胸接受治疗的急诊科患者的治疗结果。
Chest. 2008 Nov;134(5):1033-1036. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0910. Epub 2008 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: a mini-review on its latest evidence.自发性气胸的管理:关于其最新证据的小型综述
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):4756-4763. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-415. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
2
New insights into spontaneous pneumothorax: A review.自发性气胸的新见解:综述
Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 9;27(1). doi: 10.7196/AJTCCM.2021.v27i1.054. eCollection 2021.
3
An evidence-based review of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in the adolescent population.青少年原发性自发性气胸的循证综述。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Jun 18;2(3):e12449. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12449. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Conservative versus invasive management of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax: a retrospective cohort study.继发性自发性气胸的保守治疗与侵入性治疗:一项回顾性队列研究
Acute Med Surg. 2021 May 7;8(1):e663. doi: 10.1002/ams2.663. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
5
Chest Tube Drainage Versus Conservative Management as the Initial Treatment of Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.胸腔闭式引流与保守治疗作为原发性自发性气胸初始治疗方法的系统评价和Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 27;9(11):3456. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113456.
6
Is surgery the choice for treatment for first presentation of pneumothorax?气胸首次发作时,手术是治疗的选择吗?
J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(Suppl 9):S1398-S1401. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.03.16.
7
Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of invasive versus conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax.原发性自发性气胸的侵袭性与保守性管理随机对照试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 13;6(9):e011826. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011826.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-step management of pneumothorax: time for a re-think on initial management.气胸的三步管理:重新思考初始管理的时候了。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Feb;16(2):186-92. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs445. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
2
A prospective, randomised trial of pneumothorax therapy: manual aspiration versus conventional chest tube drainage.前瞻性、随机对照试验气胸治疗:手动抽气与传统胸腔引流管。
Respir Med. 2012 Nov;106(11):1600-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
3
Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010.自发性气胸的管理:英国胸科学会胸膜疾病指南2010
Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii18-31. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.136986.
4
Spontaneous pneumothorax: time for some fresh air.自发性气胸:来点新鲜空气吧。
Intern Med J. 2010 Mar;40(3):231-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.02155.x.
5
Treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax.原发性自发性气胸的治疗
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2009 Jul;15(4):376-9. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32832ae314.
6
Comparison of size classification of primary spontaneous pneumothorax by three international guidelines: a case for international consensus?三种国际指南对原发性自发性气胸大小分类的比较:是否需要国际共识?
Respir Med. 2008 Dec;102(12):1830-2. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.07.026. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
7
Outcomes of emergency department patients treated for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.因原发性自发性气胸接受治疗的急诊科患者的治疗结果。
Chest. 2008 Nov;134(5):1033-1036. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0910. Epub 2008 Jun 26.
8
Deviation from published guidelines in the management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in Australia.澳大利亚原发性自发性气胸管理中与已发表指南的偏差。
Intern Med J. 2008 Jan;38(1):64-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01540.x.
9
Management and outcome of spontaneous pneumothoraces at three urban EDs.三家城市急诊室自发性气胸的管理与治疗结果
Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Oct;19(5):449-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.01011.x.
10
Treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in Switzerland: results of a survey.瑞士原发性自发性气胸的治疗:一项调查结果
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2006 Apr;5(2):139-44. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2005.122770. Epub 2006 Jan 13.

原发性自发性气胸的保守治疗与侵入性治疗:一项回顾性队列研究

Conservative versus invasive treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Chew Rusheng, Gerhardy Benjamin, Simpson Graham

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Medicine Cairns Base Hospital Cairns Australia.

James Cook University School of Medicine and Dentistry Cairns Australia.

出版信息

Acute Med Surg. 2014 May 19;1(4):195-199. doi: 10.1002/ams2.33. eCollection 2014 Oct.

DOI:10.1002/ams2.33
PMID:29930848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5997214/
Abstract

AIM

The best management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax is unclear. Conservative treatment has been proposed, but no studies comparing conservative with invasive management have been carried out where pneumothorax size has been numerically quantified. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of conservative management for primary spontaneous pneumothoraces of any size.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of adult patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax treated at an Australian tertiary hospital from 2006-2011, carried out by case-note and chest radiograph review. Patient demographics, smoking status, and outcome data were collected. Pneumothorax size was calculated using the Collins method, based on the sum of interpleural distances.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-seven episodes from 116 patients were identified. Males (86) comprised 75% of patients, and the median age at presentation was 37 years. Eighty-two percent of cases (106) were ever-smokers. Of the episodes in which pre-treatment radiographs were available, 53 were treated conservatively and 58 invasively with tube thoracostomy, and all were clinically stable. When cases were stratified by pneumothorax size, age, sex, ethnicity, and smoking status had no effect on outcome. Compared to invasive treatment, conservative management resulted in no complications, an equal recurrence rate, and a significantly shorter length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that it may be feasible to adopt a conservative approach as the first-line treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in clinically stable patients. However, given the limitations of this study, a large randomised controlled trial is required to conclusively prove this assertion.

摘要

目的

原发性自发性气胸的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。有人提出采用保守治疗,但尚未开展将保守治疗与侵入性治疗进行比较的研究,其中气胸大小进行了数值量化。本研究旨在评估对任何大小的原发性自发性气胸进行保守治疗的可行性。

方法

对2006年至2011年在澳大利亚一家三级医院接受治疗的成年原发性自发性气胸患者进行回顾性队列研究,通过病例记录和胸部X光片复查进行。收集患者的人口统计学资料、吸烟状况和结局数据。基于胸膜间距离之和,采用柯林斯方法计算气胸大小。

结果

共识别出116例患者的127次发作。男性患者86例(占75%),就诊时的中位年龄为37岁。82%的病例(106例)曾吸烟。在有治疗前X光片的发作中,53例采用保守治疗,58例采用胸腔闭式引流术进行侵入性治疗,所有患者临床均稳定。按气胸大小、年龄、性别、种族和吸烟状况对病例进行分层时,这些因素对结局均无影响。与侵入性治疗相比,保守治疗无并发症,复发率相同,住院时间显著缩短。

结论

我们的结果表明,对于临床稳定的原发性自发性气胸患者,采用保守方法作为一线治疗可能是可行的。然而,鉴于本研究的局限性,需要进行一项大型随机对照试验来最终证实这一观点。