• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

套筒式陶瓷股骨头体内腐蚀:一项回顾性研究。

In Vivo Corrosion of Sleeved Ceramic Femoral Heads: A Retrieval Study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2021 Mar;36(3):1133-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.005
PMID:33121849
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a series of retrieved sleeved ceramic femoral heads used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and determine qualitative and quantitative damage and corrosion patterns.

METHODS

An IRB-approved implant retrieval database was utilized to identify all sleeved ceramic femoral heads collected from 1995 to 2004. There were 16 implants with an average duration of in situ of 70 months (range, 13-241 months). The femoral stem was known in 14 cases and was titanium alloy in each of those cases. None were revised for metal-related complications. Ten implants (63%) were from primary THAs, and 6 (38%) were from revision THAs. Damage and corrosion were qualitatively graded using a modified Goldberg method. A quantitative assessment was performed with a coordinate measurement machine (CMM).

RESULTS

Among the 16 retrieved implants, 1 (6%) demonstrated severe Grade 4 corrosion, 5 (31%) had moderate Grade 3 corrosion, 5 (31%) had mild Grade 2 corrosion, and 5 (31%) had no visible corrosion at the inner sleeve that interfaces with the stem trunnion. The only case of grade 4 corrosion occurred in the only head-sleeve in the study that was not factory assembled and was mated with a titanium molybdenum zirconium ferrous (TMZF) alloy stem. The mean maximum linear corrosion depth at the taper interface, as measured by the CMM, was 7.7 microns (range, 0.9-32.9 microns).

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to quantify corrosion at the titanium interface of sleeved ceramic femoral heads. Potentially clinically significant damage and corrosion patterns were observed in a few failed retrievals; however, the majority of cases demonstrated minimal or no damage.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估一系列用于全髋关节置换术(THA)的回收套筒陶瓷股骨头,并确定其定性和定量的损伤及腐蚀模式。

方法

利用经 IRB 批准的植入物检索数据库,确定从 1995 年至 2004 年收集的所有套筒陶瓷股骨头。有 16 个植入物,平均体内留存时间为 70 个月(范围 13-241 个月)。14 个病例中已知股骨柄,且均为钛合金。没有因金属相关并发症而进行翻修。10 个植入物(63%)来自初次 THA,6 个(38%)来自翻修 THA。使用改良的 Goldberg 方法对损伤和腐蚀进行定性分级。使用坐标测量机(CMM)进行定量评估。

结果

在 16 个回收的植入物中,有 1 个(6%)表现出严重的 4 级腐蚀,5 个(31%)为中度 3 级腐蚀,5 个(31%)为轻度 2 级腐蚀,5 个(31%)在与股骨柄头接触的套筒内无可见腐蚀。唯一的 4 级腐蚀发生在研究中唯一一个未进行工厂组装且与钛钼锆铁(TMZF)合金柄匹配的头套中。用 CMM 测量的锥面接口处最大线性腐蚀深度的平均值为 7.7 微米(范围 0.9-32.9 微米)。

结论

本研究首次定量评估了套筒陶瓷股骨头钛界面的腐蚀情况。在一些失效的回收中观察到潜在的临床显著损伤和腐蚀模式,但大多数病例显示出最小或无损伤。

相似文献

1
In Vivo Corrosion of Sleeved Ceramic Femoral Heads: A Retrieval Study.套筒式陶瓷股骨头体内腐蚀:一项回顾性研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Mar;36(3):1133-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
2
Fretting and Corrosion Damage in Taper Adapter Sleeves for Ceramic Heads: A Retrieval Study.陶瓷头锥度适配套筒中的微动磨损与腐蚀损伤:一项取出研究
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2887-2891. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.025. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
3
Ceramic Heads Decrease Metal Release Caused by Head-taper Fretting and Corrosion.陶瓷股骨头可减少因头颈锥度微动和腐蚀导致的金属释放。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):985-94. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4683-1. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
4
Insights into Imprinting: How Is the Phenomenon of Tribocorrosion at Head-Neck Taper Interfaces Related to Corrosion, Fretting, and Implant Design Parameters?压痕现象洞察:头-颈锥度界面的摩擦腐蚀现象与腐蚀、微动以及植入物设计参数有何关联?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Aug 1;480(8):1585-1600. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002202. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
5
Otto Aufranc Award: Large Heads Do Not Increase Damage at the Head-neck Taper of Metal-on-polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasties.奥托·奥夫兰克奖:大头不会增加金属对聚乙烯全髋关节置换术头颈锥度处的损伤。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):330-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4468-6.
6
Do ceramic femoral heads reduce taper fretting corrosion in hip arthroplasty? A retrieval study.陶瓷股骨头能否减少髋关节置换术中的锥形磨损腐蚀?一项检索研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Oct;471(10):3270-82. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3096-2. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
7
Trunnion Failure of the Recalled Low Friction Ion Treatment Cobalt Chromium Alloy Femoral Head.召回的低摩擦离子处理钴铬合金股骨头的耳轴故障
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2857-2863. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.075. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
8
In Vivo Corrosion of Modular Dual-Mobility Implants: A Retrieval Study.体内可腐蚀的模块化双动活动假体:一项回顾性研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Nov;35(11):3326-3329. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.075. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
9
Femoral head material loss at the head-neck junction in total hip arthroplasty: the effect of head size, stem material and stem offset.全髋关节置换术中股骨头颈交界处的股骨头材料损失:股骨头大小、柄部材料和柄部偏移的影响。
Hip Int. 2019 Nov;29(6):647-651. doi: 10.1177/1120700018814473. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
10
Are Damage Modes Related to Microstructure and Material Loss in Severely Damaged CoCrMo Femoral Heads?严重损伤的 CoCrMo 股骨头中损伤模式与微观结构和材料损失有关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Sep 1;479(9):2083-2096. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001819.

引用本文的文献

1
Electrically Active Biomaterials for Stimulation and Regeneration in Tissue Engineering.用于组织工程中刺激与再生的电活性生物材料。
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2025 Jan;113(1):e37871. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37871.
2
Can severity of trunnion damage be estimated by visual inspection alone?仅通过目视检查就能估算出耳轴损坏的严重程度吗?
Bone Joint Res. 2023 Mar 1;12(3):155-164. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.123.BJR-2022-0099.R1.
3
Surface Analysis of Ti-Alloy Micro-Grooved 12/14 Tapers Assembled to Non-Sleeved and Sleeved Ceramic Heads: A Comparative Study of Retrieved Hip Prostheses.
组装到无套筒和有套筒陶瓷头的钛合金微槽12/14锥度的表面分析:翻修髋关节假体的对比研究
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jan 25;16(3):1067. doi: 10.3390/ma16031067.
4
Catastrophic intraoperative failure of a ceramic femoral head.陶瓷股骨头术中灾难性失败。
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Oct 8;11:234-238. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.08.017. eCollection 2021 Oct.