Çekok Kübra, Kahraman Turhan, Duran Gözde, Dönmez Çolakoğlu Berril, Yener Görsev, Yerlikaya Deniz, Genç Arzu
Physical Therapy, Medical Park Hospital, Izmir, TUR.
Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, TUR.
Cureus. 2020 Sep 22;12(9):e10604. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10604.
Background The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a simple and widely used clinical test for the assessment of lower extremity function, balance, mobility, and fall risk in various populations. The TUG has been found as a valid and reliable measure in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Besides, the addition of a cognitive task to the TUG (TUG-cognitive) enhances predictive validity related to fall risk in people with PD. However, further investigation is needed about the correlations of the TUG-cognitive test with neuropsychological measures in people with PD. Methods Thirty-three people with PD [modified Hoehn and Yahr scale, median (min-max)=2.5 (1.0-3.0)] participated in this cross-sectional study. The TUG was administered in the traditional way and with a cognitive task (counting backward by three from any number between 20 and 100). Neuropsychological measures included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Trail Making Test (TMT), and the Simple Reaction Time (SRT) test for stepping. The self-reported number of falls in the last six months was also recorded. Results The TUG-cognitive [13.1 (SD=8.5) seconds] was significantly longer than the TUG-traditional [12.2 (SD=8.1) seconds] (p<0.01). The TUG-cognitive significantly correlated with the MoCA [(rho=-0.712), TMT part A (TMT-A; rho=0.722), TMT part B (TMT-B; rho=0.694), SRT (rho=0.794), and number of falls (rho=0.960)] (p<0.01). The TUG-traditional also significantly correlated with the MoCA (rho=-0.682), TMT-A (rho=0.684), TMT-B (rho=0.746), SRT (rho=0.755), and number of falls (rho=0.702) (p<0.01). Conclusion Both the TUG-cognitive and TUG-traditional strongly correlated with neuropsychological measures; while the correlations were slightly stronger for the TUG-cognitive, the difference was not significant. The TUG-cognitive can be used in the clinical practice as a simple and more informative alternative to the TUG-traditional in people with PD.
定时起立行走(TUG)测试是一项简单且广泛应用的临床测试,用于评估不同人群的下肢功能、平衡能力、活动能力和跌倒风险。TUG测试已被证明是评估帕金森病(PD)患者的有效且可靠的指标。此外,在TUG测试中加入认知任务(TUG-认知测试)可提高与PD患者跌倒风险相关的预测效度。然而,仍需进一步研究TUG-认知测试与PD患者神经心理学指标之间的相关性。
33名PD患者[改良Hoehn和Yahr量表,中位数(最小值-最大值)=2.5(1.0-3.0)]参与了这项横断面研究。TUG测试采用传统方式进行,并加入认知任务(从20到100之间的任意数字开始倒着数3)。神经心理学指标包括蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)、连线测验(TMT)以及步幅简单反应时间(SRT)测试。还记录了患者自我报告的过去六个月内的跌倒次数。
TUG-认知测试[13.1(标准差=8.5)秒]显著长于传统TUG测试[12.2(标准差=8.1)秒](p<0.01)。TUG-认知测试与MoCA(相关系数=-0.712)、TMT A部分(TMT-A;相关系数=0.722)、TMT B部分(TMT-B;相关系数=0.694)、SRT(相关系数=0.794)以及跌倒次数(相关系数=0.960)均显著相关(p<0.01)。传统TUG测试也与MoCA(相关系数=-0.682)、TMT-A(相关系数=0.684)、TMT-B(相关系数=0.746)、SRT(相关系数=0.755)以及跌倒次数(相关系数=0.702)显著相关(p<0.01)。
TUG-认知测试和传统TUG测试均与神经心理学指标密切相关;虽然TUG-认知测试的相关性略强,但差异不显著。在临床实践中,TUG-认知测试可作为一种简单且信息更丰富的替代方法,用于评估PD患者,替代传统TUG测试。