Institute of Sports Medicine & Prevention, University of Leipzig Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
Institut für Prävention, Universitat Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Int J Sports Med. 2021 May;42(5):448-455. doi: 10.1055/a-1236-3814. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
The importance of using mouthguards as well as their low acceptance rate have been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of customized mouthguards on hemodynamics.. This randomized crossover study used data from 13 subjects (23.5±1.4 years). The cardiopulmonary and metabolic parameters were observed during ergometer tests without mouthguard (control) in comparison to two types of mouthguards (with and normal without breathing channels). Maximum ventilation was significantly decreased with the normal mouthguard (113.3±30.00 l ∙ min) in contrast to the mouthguard with breathing channels (122.5±22.9 l ∙ min) and control (121.9±30.8 l ∙ min). Also the inspiration time was longer when using the normal mouthguard (0.70±0.11 s) compared to the mouthguard with breathing channels (0.63±0.11 s) and control (Co 0.64±0.10 s). Lactate was also increased under the influence of the mouthguard with breathing channels (10.72±1.4 mmol ∙ l) compared to the control (9.40±1.77 mmol ∙ l) and the normal mouthguard (9.02±1.67 mmol ∙ l). In addition, stroke volume kinetics (p=0.048) and maximum heart rates (p=0.01) show changes. Despite equal levels of oxygen uptake and performances under all three conditions, the use of mouthguards showed differences in cardiopulmonary parameters. The use of mouthguards during exercise does not affect physical performance and can be recommended for injury prevention.
使用护齿器的重要性及其低接受率已得到证明。本研究旨在探讨定制护齿器对血液动力学的影响。这项随机交叉研究使用了 13 名受试者(23.5±1.4 岁)的数据。在没有护齿器(对照)的情况下进行测功机测试时观察心肺和代谢参数,并与两种类型的护齿器(带和不带呼吸通道的正常护齿器)进行比较。与带呼吸通道的护齿器(122.5±22.9 l ∙ min)和对照(121.9±30.8 l ∙ min)相比,正常护齿器的最大通气量明显降低(113.3±30.00 l ∙ min)。使用正常护齿器时,吸气时间也更长(0.70±0.11 s),与带呼吸通道的护齿器(0.63±0.11 s)和对照(Co 0.64±0.10 s)相比。在带呼吸通道的护齿器的影响下,乳酸也增加(10.72±1.4 mmol ∙ l),与对照(9.40±1.77 mmol ∙ l)和正常护齿器(9.02±1.67 mmol ∙ l)相比。此外,心搏量动力学(p=0.048)和最大心率(p=0.01)发生变化。尽管在所有三种情况下,氧摄取量和表现水平相等,但护齿器的使用在心肺参数上存在差异。在运动中使用护齿器不会影响身体表现,可以推荐用于预防受伤。