Suppr超能文献

近端泪道阻塞的处理:一种原理。

Management of proximal lacrimal obstructions: a rationale.

机构信息

Oftalmoplastica Roma, Rome, Italy.

Orbital and Adnexal Service, VillaTiberia Hospital - GVM Care & Research, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun;99(4):e569-e575. doi: 10.1111/aos.14632. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify a rationale for correct surgical treatment of proximal lacrimal obstructions.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 775 consecutive patients (974 eyes) with proximal lacrimal obstructions, operated on with customized surgery by a senior surgeon (FMQL) from January 2003 to December 2018.

RESULTS

In case of punctal stenosis, punctoplasty was as effective as punctal dilatation with monocanalicular or bicanalicular stent (p > 0.05). In proximal canalicular obstructions, failure rate of dacrocystorhinostomy with retrograde intubation (R-DCR) was significantly higher in case of false inferior passage creation than in case of no false passage creation (p = 0.02). In mid-canalicular obstructions failure rate of R-DCR was 41.3%, and bypass surgery with Jones tube at second stage was likely. Trephination and monocanalicular intubation, performed in selected cases, had a failure rate respectively of 16.6% and 21.7% in mid and distal canalicular obstructions. Canaliculodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) was successful in 77% of cases of proximal common canalicular obstruction. Bypass surgery is the treatment of choice in case of no residual patency, and rates of tube extrusion were significantly reduced with the use of StopLoss Jones tubes (SLJT) (1.7%) with respect to standard tubes (12%), (p = 0.04, Fisher's exact test).

CONCLUSION

Patient history and accurate diagnosis of the site of obstruction are essential for a correct surgical choice. Less invasive techniques as trephination and intubation may be effective, but should be reserved to patients with no associated lower lacrimal obstruction. Further studies require specific randomized clinical trials, and a standardized protocol adopted by different clinical centres.

摘要

目的

确定正确治疗近端泪道阻塞的基本原理。

方法

回顾性分析 2003 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月间由一位资深外科医生(FMQL)采用定制手术治疗的 775 例(974 只眼)连续近端泪道阻塞患者。

结果

在泪小点狭窄的情况下,泪小点成形术与单通道或双通道支架扩张术(p>0.05)同样有效。在近端泪小管阻塞的情况下,逆行泪囊鼻腔吻合术(R-DCR)的失败率在假性下泪道形成的情况下明显高于没有假性下泪道形成的情况(p=0.02)。在中泪小管阻塞的情况下,R-DCR 的失败率为 41.3%,很可能需要二期进行 Jones 管旁路手术。在选择的病例中,经皮穿刺和单通道插管在中、远段泪小管阻塞中的失败率分别为 16.6%和 21.7%。在近端共同泪小管阻塞的情况下,77%的病例行泪道重建术(CDCR)成功。在没有残余通畅的情况下,旁路手术是首选治疗方法,使用 StopLoss Jones 管(SLJT)(1.7%)与标准管(12%)相比,管脱出率明显降低(p=0.04,Fisher 确切检验)。

结论

患者病史和阻塞部位的准确诊断对于正确的手术选择至关重要。经皮穿刺和插管等微创技术可能有效,但应保留给无下泪道阻塞的患者。需要进一步的研究,进行具体的随机临床试验,并采用不同临床中心的标准化方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验