Xu Lu, Jiang Yong-Jun, Duan Shi-Hui, He Rui-Liang
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Karst Environment, School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2020 Aug 8;41(8):3637-3645. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201909230.
Due to the vulnerability of karst hydrological systems, nitrate pollution in karst groundwater has become a global common and serious environmental problem. In order to ensure drinking water safety, it is very important to accurately identify groundwater nitrate sources. The groundwater hydrochemistry and N-NO and O-NO isotopes were analyzed in samples taken from a suburb of Chongqing:the Longfeng karst trough-valley, which is mainly affected by agricultural activities, and the Longche karst trough-valley, which is primarily affected by urbanization. The IsoSource model was then used to quantify the groundwater nitrate sources. The results showed that:① The NO concentration in groundwater ranged from 19.31 mg·L to 37.01 mg·L(mean of 28.21 mg·L) in the Longfeng karst trough-valley, and from 2.15 mg·L to 27.69 mg·L(mean of 10.31 mg·L) in the Longche karst trough-valley. The groundwater NO concentration exhibited an obvious seasonal variation in both valleys. ② The N-NO and O-NO isotopes in groundwater in the Longfeng karst trough-valley ranged from 3.29‰ to 11.03‰ (mean of 6.74‰) and 0.88‰ to 7.51‰ (mean of 3.18‰), respectively. In contrast, groundwater in the Longche karst trough-valley presented higher N-NO and O-NO values that ranged from 5.25‰ to 11.40‰ (mean of 7.95‰) and 2.90‰ to 19.94‰ (mean of 11.18‰), respectively. The lower values of N-NO and O-NO in groundwater in the Longfeng karst trough-valley suggest that groundwater NO was mainly sourced from agricultural N fertilizer, while the higher values of N-NO and O-NO in groundwater in the Longche karst trough-valley indicate that groundwater NO was primarily sourced from domestic sewage. Moreover, such N-NO and O-NO values in groundwater indicate that nitrification was the primary process for nitrogen conversion in both valleys. Meanwhile, significant seasonal differences in groundwater N-NO and O-NO were observed in both valleys; the N-NO and O-NO values were higher during the dry season (means of 8.83‰ and 2.79‰, respectively) than during the rainy season (means of 4.64‰ and 3.58‰, respectively) in the Longfeng karst trough-valley, whereas the N-NO and O-NO values were lower during the dry season (means of 9.79‰ and 14.56‰, respectively) than during the rainy season (means of 5.12‰ and 7.8‰, respectively) in the Longche trough-valley. This suggests that there were differences in the seasonal NO sources to groundwater in both valleys. During the rainy season, the groundwater NO concentration in the Longfeng karst trough-valley was mainly due to the nitrification of NH in precipitation and fertilizer as well as organic nitrogen in soil, whereas during the dry season, the groundwater NO concentration primarily originated from domestic sewage. In contrast, the groundwater NO concentration in the Longche karst trough-valley primarily originated from domestic sewage in both seasons. ③ The results of the IsoSource model indicated that the nitrification of NH from fertilizer and rainwater was the primary NO source to groundwater (44.63% of the total) in the Longfeng trough valley, and was followed by domestic sewage (29.5%), soil organic nitrogen (22.38%), and NO from rainwater and fertilizer (<10%). During the rainy season, the groundwater NO concentration was mainly due to the nitrification of NH from fertilizer and rainwater (52.25% of the total) in Longfeng trough-valley, while groundwater NO concentration primarily originated from domestic sewage during the dry season (41% of the total). In contrast, the groundwater NO concentration was mainly from domestic sewage (36.17%) in Longche karst trough-valley, and was followed by the nitrification of NH from fertilizer and rainwater (23.5%), soil organic nitrogen (22.5%), and NO from rainwater and fertilizer (<10%). The groundwater NO concentration in the Longche karst trough-valley primarily originated from domestic sewage in both seasons, and accounted for 47% and 25% during the rainy season and dry season, respectively.
由于岩溶水文系统的脆弱性,岩溶地区地下水中的硝酸盐污染已成为一个全球性的普遍且严重的环境问题。为确保饮用水安全,准确识别地下水中硝酸盐的来源非常重要。对采自重庆郊区的水样进行了地下水水化学以及氮 - 硝酸盐(N - NO)和氧 - 硝酸盐(O - NO)同位素分析:主要受农业活动影响的龙凤岩溶槽谷,以及主要受城市化影响的龙车岩溶槽谷。然后使用IsoSource模型对地下水中硝酸盐的来源进行了量化。结果表明:①龙凤岩溶槽谷地下水中NO浓度范围为19.31 mg·L至37.01 mg·L(均值为28.21 mg·L),龙车岩溶槽谷地下水中NO浓度范围为2.15 mg·L至27.69 mg·L(均值为10.31 mg·L)。两个槽谷地下水中的NO浓度均呈现出明显的季节变化。②龙凤岩溶槽谷地下水中的N - NO和O - NO同位素分别为3.29‰至11.03‰(均值为6.74‰)和0.88‰至7.51‰(均值为3.18‰)。相比之下,龙车岩溶槽谷地下水中的N - NO和O - NO值更高,分别为5.25‰至11.40‰(均值为7.95‰)和2.90‰至19.94‰(均值为11.18‰)。龙凤岩溶槽谷地下水中较低的N - NO和O - NO值表明,地下水中的NO主要来源于农业氮肥,而龙车岩溶槽谷地下水中较高的N - NO和O - NO值表明,地下水中的NO主要来源于生活污水。此外,地下水中这样的N - NO和O - NO值表明,硝化作用是两个槽谷中氮转化的主要过程。同时,在两个槽谷中均观察到地下水中N - NO和O - NO存在显著的季节差异;龙凤岩溶槽谷中,旱季的N - NO和O - NO值(分别均值为8.83‰和2.79‰)高于雨季(分别均值为4.64‰和3.58‰),而在龙车槽谷中,旱季的N - NO和O - NO值(分别均值为9.79‰和14.56‰)低于雨季(分别均值为5.12‰和7.8‰)。这表明两个槽谷中地下水中硝酸盐的季节性来源存在差异。在雨季,龙凤岩溶槽谷地下水中的NO浓度主要源于降水中NH以及肥料和土壤中有机氮的硝化作用,而在旱季,地下水中的NO浓度主要源于生活污水。相比之下,龙车岩溶槽谷地下水中的NO浓度在两个季节均主要源于生活污水。③IsoSource模型的结果表明,肥料和雨水中NH的硝化作用是龙凤槽谷地下水中硝酸盐的主要来源(占总量的44.63%),其次是生活污水(29.5%)、土壤有机氮(22.38%)以及雨水和肥料中的NO(<10%)。在雨季,龙凤槽谷地下水中的NO浓度主要源于肥料和雨水中NH的硝化作用(占总量的52.25%),而在旱季,地下水中的NO浓度主要源于生活污水(占总量的41%)。相比之下,龙车岩溶槽谷地下水中的NO浓度主要源于生活污水(36.17%),其次是肥料和雨水中NH的硝化作用(23.5%)、土壤有机氮(22.5%)以及雨水和肥料中的NO(<10%)。龙车岩溶槽谷地下水中的NO浓度在两个季节均主要源于生活污水,在雨季和旱季分别占47%和25%。