Suppr超能文献

四项目家庭用水不安全体验量表评估与健康和福祉相关的用水问题的有效性。

Validity of a Four-Item Household Water Insecurity Experiences Scale for Assessing Water Issues Related to Health and Well-Being.

机构信息

1Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.

2Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Jan;104(1):391-394. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0417.

Abstract

We sought to determine whether a shortened version of the 12-item Household Water Insecurity Experiences (HWISE) Scale, which measures water insecurity equivalently in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), is valid for broad use. Using data from 9,261 households in 25 LMICs, subsets of candidate items were evaluated on their predictive accuracy, criterion validity, and sensitivity-specificity. A subset with items assessing "worry," "changing plans," "limited drinking water," and "inability to wash hands" because of problems with water (range: 0-12) were highly correlated with full HWISE Scale scores (correlation coefficient: 0.949-0.980) and introduced minimal additional error (root mean square error: 2.13-2.68). Criterion validity was demonstrated, and a cut point of ≥ 4 correctly classified more than 91% of households as water secure or insecure. The brief HWISE-4 can be used in LMICs to inform decisions about how to most effectively target resources and evaluate public health interventions.

摘要

我们试图确定 12 项家庭用水不安全体验量表(HWIS)的简化版是否在中低收入国家(LMIC)中具有等效的测量水不安全的有效性,该量表可广泛使用。使用来自 25 个 LMIC 的 9261 户家庭的数据,对候选项目的子集进行了预测准确性、效标效度和灵敏度-特异性评估。一个子集包含评估“担忧”、“改变计划”、“有限的饮用水”和“因水问题而无法洗手”的项目(范围:0-12),与完整的 HWIS 量表评分高度相关(相关系数:0.949-0.980),并且引入的额外错误最小(均方根误差:2.13-2.68)。证明了效标效度,并且≥4 的截断点正确分类了超过 91%的家庭为水安全或不安全。简短的 HWIS-4 可在 LMIC 中用于告知有关如何最有效地针对资源和评估公共卫生干预措施的决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验