Department of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland.
Institute of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poznań, Poland.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 30;15(10):e0241464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241464. eCollection 2020.
At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic (10-14 March, 2020) we conducted a survey (n = 1028) of a nationally representative sample (age, sex, and locale) in Poland. Respondents indicated how strong they thought the threat was to themselves, to Poland, and the world. They also described their emotional reactions to the pandemic, which we used to calculate three scores: Anxiety, Hopelessness, and Panic. Respondents also indicated how often they engaged in various coping behaviors and how much they supported different types of economic sacrifice. We used these responses to calculate measures that we labelled as Spread Prevention (e.g., social distancing), Self-preservation (food stockpiling), and Economic Sacrifice (e.g., fighting COVID-19 regardless of the cost). Multiple regression analyses found that perceived threat to self was the most reliable predictor (positive) of emotional reactions and of coping behaviors, and that Anxiety was the most reliable predictor (positive) of Spread prevention and Economic sacrifice. Panic predicted (positively) Self-preservation. A series of mediation analyses found that Anxiety mediated relationships between threat and coping behaviors, and that Panic mediated the relationship between perceived threats and Self-preservation. In addition, we found that scores on all measures, except Panic, increased following the announcement of the first COVID-19 related fatality in Poland, which occurred on the third (middle) day of the study. The mediational relationships we found did not vary as a function of whether the data were collected before or after this announcement. The present results suggest that emotional reactions to perceived threats can serve an instrumental function by providing the motivation to engage in coping behaviors. Such a mechanism complements much research on stress that has focused on how coping mediates threat-emotion relationships.
在 COVID-19 大流行初期(2020 年 3 月 10 日至 14 日),我们对波兰进行了一项全国代表性样本(年龄、性别和地点)的调查(n = 1028)。受访者表示他们认为对自己、波兰和世界的威胁有多大。他们还描述了对大流行的情绪反应,我们用这些反应来计算三个分数:焦虑、绝望和恐慌。受访者还表示他们经常进行哪些应对行为,以及他们对不同类型的经济牺牲的支持程度。我们使用这些回答来计算我们称之为传播预防(例如,社交距离)、自我保护(食品储备)和经济牺牲(例如,不惜一切代价抗击 COVID-19)的措施。多元回归分析发现,对自身的威胁感知是情绪反应和应对行为最可靠的预测因素(正相关),而焦虑是传播预防和经济牺牲最可靠的预测因素(正相关)。恐慌预测(正相关)自我保护。一系列中介分析发现,焦虑中介了威胁与应对行为之间的关系,而恐慌中介了感知威胁与自我保护之间的关系。此外,我们发现除了恐慌之外,所有衡量标准的得分都在波兰首例 COVID-19 相关死亡事件公布后(研究的第三天)增加。我们发现的中介关系不因数据是在该公告之前还是之后收集而有所不同。这些结果表明,对感知威胁的情绪反应可以通过提供应对行为的动机来发挥工具性作用。这种机制补充了许多关注应对如何中介威胁情绪关系的压力研究。