Klotch D W, Gilliland R
Department of Otolaryngology, S.U.N.Y. at Buffalo.
J Trauma. 1987 Oct;27(10):1136-45. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198710000-00008.
The purpose of this review is to evaluate internal fixation by means of AO miniplates compared to conventional therapy for the treatment of complicated midface fractures. A more precise division of midface fractures into functional units than that afforded by the Le Fort classification was employed to categorize the complexity of injury. The criteria of evaluation were ease of functional rehabilitation, incidence of complications, and results of surgery. The classification system was helpful in surgical planning and in subsequent analysis of results. Forty-nine of the 92 midface fractures treated by open repair between July 1980 and January 1986 were malar fractures, and 41 of these had associated orbital fractures. The remaining 43 had Le Fort II or more complicated midface fractures, only 15 of which could be adequately categorized by the Le Fort classification. Twenty-two of the 43 patients with complicated midface fractures were surgically treated with internal fixation utilizing 67 AO miniplates. The remaining 21 patients were treated with conventional therapy utilizing a combination of intermaxillary fixation (IMF), and/or interosseous wiring, and/or primary bone grafting. Among the problems encountered were a nonunion of the midface in a delayed repair of a severely comminuted midface fracture, which required secondary split rib grafting. Three plates were removed because of intraoral extrusion. There were no plate-related infections. One of the advantages of internal fixation is that the need for primary bone grafting and external fixation is eliminated. Another is that intermaxillary fixation is needed less frequently, allowing immediate access to the oral cavity for control of airway, care of intraoral wounds, and rapid return to normal alimentation with full mandibular function. Most patients with no associated GI problems tolerated a soft diet within 6 days. Tracheostomy tubes were removed within 3 days if no pulmonary failure was present. We can conclude that internal fixation provides excellent stabilization and repair of complicated midface injuries with minimal complications and rapid return to function for most patients.
本综述的目的是评估与传统治疗方法相比,使用AO微型钢板进行内固定治疗复杂面中部骨折的效果。采用了一种比Le Fort分类法对面中部骨折功能单位划分更精确的方法来对损伤的复杂性进行分类。评估标准为功能康复的难易程度、并发症发生率和手术结果。该分类系统有助于手术规划和后续结果分析。1980年7月至1986年1月间接受开放修复治疗的92例面中部骨折中,49例为颧骨骨折,其中41例伴有眶部骨折。其余43例为Le Fort II型或更复杂的面中部骨折,其中只有15例能通过Le Fort分类法进行充分分类。43例复杂面中部骨折患者中的22例接受了使用67块AO微型钢板的内固定手术治疗。其余21例患者接受了传统治疗,采用了颌间固定(IMF)、和/或骨间结扎、和/或一期植骨的联合治疗。遇到的问题包括严重粉碎性面中部骨折延迟修复时面中部骨不连,这需要二期肋骨劈开植骨。3块钢板因口腔内移位而取出。未发生与钢板相关的感染。内固定的优点之一是无需一期植骨和外固定。另一个优点是颌间固定的使用频率较低,可立即进入口腔以控制气道、护理口腔伤口,并能在全下颌功能的情况下迅速恢复正常饮食。大多数无相关胃肠道问题的患者在6天内可耐受软食。如果没有呼吸衰竭,气管造口管可在3天内拔除。我们可以得出结论,内固定能为复杂面中部损伤提供良好的稳定和修复,并发症最少,大多数患者能迅速恢复功能。