Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
J Pediatr. 2021 Mar;230:167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.10.042. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
To explore the health characteristics of youth with diabetes in cyber school compared with peers with diabetes in traditional brick-and-mortar schools.
This was a single-center cross-sectional study of youth with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in K-12 education during academic year 2017-2018. Youth enrolled in cyber school were matched with traditional school peers by age, sex, race, diagnosis, and diabetes duration. Comparisons included insurance status, hemoglobin A1c, treatment, coexisting conditions, screening, and healthcare use.
Of 1694 participants, 5% (n = 87) were enrolled in cyber school. Youth enrolled in cyber school were predominantly white (89%), female (60%), adolescents (median 15.2 years) with type 1 diabetes (91%). Youth with type 2 diabetes were excluded from analyses owing to the small sample (n = 7). Public insurance was more common among youth enrolled in cyber school (P = .005). Youth in cyber school had higher mean hemoglobin A1c, 9.1 ± 1.8% (76 ± 20 mmol/mol) vs 8.3 ± 1.2% (67 ± 13 mmol/mol) (P = .003), lower insulin pump use (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.18-0.73), and more mental health conditions (OR, 4.48; 95% CI, 1.94-10.35) compared with peers in traditional schools. Youth in cyber school were less likely to have recommended vision (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.75) and dental (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15-0.75) evaluations. The relationship between hemoglobin A1c and cyber school persisted after adjusting for insurance status, pump use, and mental health conditions (P = .02). Similar trends were observed for participants with type 2 diabetes.
Youth with diabetes in cyber school may be a high-risk population. Understanding the potential impact of cyber school-related factors on health may encourage additional provider/system/school supports for these patients.
探究与传统实体学校相比,网络学校中青少年糖尿病患者的健康特征。
这是一项单中心、横断性研究,于 2017-2018 学年期间纳入 K-12 教育阶段的 1 型或 2 型糖尿病青少年患者。通过年龄、性别、种族、诊断和糖尿病病程对网络学校就读的青少年与传统学校的同龄人进行匹配。比较内容包括保险状况、糖化血红蛋白、治疗方法、并存疾病、筛查和医疗保健使用情况。
在 1694 名参与者中,5%(n=87)就读于网络学校。网络学校就读的青少年主要为白人(89%)、女性(60%)、青少年(中位数 15.2 岁),且均患有 1 型糖尿病(91%)。由于样本量小(n=7),排除了患有 2 型糖尿病的青少年参与分析。网络学校就读的青少年更常享受公共保险(P=0.005)。网络学校就读的青少年糖化血红蛋白均值更高,为 9.1±1.8%(76±20mmol/mol),而传统学校的青少年为 8.3±1.2%(67±13mmol/mol)(P=0.003),网络学校的青少年使用胰岛素泵的比例更低(比值比,0.36;95%置信区间,0.18-0.73),精神健康状况更多(比值比,4.48;95%置信区间,1.94-10.35)。与传统学校的同龄人相比,网络学校就读的青少年更不可能接受推荐的视力(比值比,0.34;95%置信区间,0.15-0.75)和牙科(比值比,0.33;95%置信区间,0.15-0.75)评估。在校正保险状况、泵的使用和精神健康状况后,糖化血红蛋白与网络学校之间的关系仍然存在(P=0.02)。对于 2 型糖尿病患者,也观察到了类似的趋势。
网络学校中的糖尿病青少年可能是一个高危人群。了解网络学校相关因素对健康的潜在影响,可能会鼓励为这些患者提供更多的提供者/系统/学校支持。